Changing how science student think: an inquiry based approach

Margi Bohm, Imogen Moore

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Australian universities lament that first year science students fail to think creatively and have difficulty using logical reason in developing conclusions. Current literature goes further and suggests first year students cannot sustain any questioning of their opinions and show little regard for exposing hidden assumptions. This paper investigates preliminary findings of a three year project that follows a cohort of secondary students as they progress through a structured inquiry-based learning program that intends to produce students who think like scientists rather than school students. A group of 30, year 8, male students (13/14 year olds) generated ecological questions they wanted answered. The students hypothesised and then planned an investigation. Data was collected in the field and analysed. The students wrote a formal report that formed a scientific explanation of what they thought was happening. There was also formal assessment of the students in the form of an on-line test on ecology. The students' enthusiasm while working in the field was extremely high and they found examining new and unusual marine creatures under the microscope very interesting. The motivation for the students, though, was to produce a high standard PowerPoint presentation rather than enter a journey of discovery in trying to explain why certain animals lived in particular areas of the intertidal zone or what forces were driving the exposed and protected beaches. This is consistent with students learning to pass exams rather than thinking scientifically about a problem. The problem is how to shift the mindset of the student from thinking about a grade at the end of the year to engaging the student to think about a problem scientifically. The summative assessment showed the weaker students improved their retention of the subject content but there was no significant improvement for the stronger students. This may mean weaker students become more engaged within an inquiry-based structure
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)579-583
    Number of pages5
    JournalThe International Journal of Learning
    Volume16
    Issue number8
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Fingerprint

    science
    student
    first-year student
    learning
    ecology
    animal
    university
    school

    Cite this

    Bohm, Margi ; Moore, Imogen. / Changing how science student think: an inquiry based approach. In: The International Journal of Learning. 2009 ; Vol. 16, No. 8. pp. 579-583.
    @article{97e4e47b4e90415985ae2f5c25824126,
    title = "Changing how science student think: an inquiry based approach",
    abstract = "Australian universities lament that first year science students fail to think creatively and have difficulty using logical reason in developing conclusions. Current literature goes further and suggests first year students cannot sustain any questioning of their opinions and show little regard for exposing hidden assumptions. This paper investigates preliminary findings of a three year project that follows a cohort of secondary students as they progress through a structured inquiry-based learning program that intends to produce students who think like scientists rather than school students. A group of 30, year 8, male students (13/14 year olds) generated ecological questions they wanted answered. The students hypothesised and then planned an investigation. Data was collected in the field and analysed. The students wrote a formal report that formed a scientific explanation of what they thought was happening. There was also formal assessment of the students in the form of an on-line test on ecology. The students' enthusiasm while working in the field was extremely high and they found examining new and unusual marine creatures under the microscope very interesting. The motivation for the students, though, was to produce a high standard PowerPoint presentation rather than enter a journey of discovery in trying to explain why certain animals lived in particular areas of the intertidal zone or what forces were driving the exposed and protected beaches. This is consistent with students learning to pass exams rather than thinking scientifically about a problem. The problem is how to shift the mindset of the student from thinking about a grade at the end of the year to engaging the student to think about a problem scientifically. The summative assessment showed the weaker students improved their retention of the subject content but there was no significant improvement for the stronger students. This may mean weaker students become more engaged within an inquiry-based structure",
    keywords = "inquiry-based, scientific method, thinking",
    author = "Margi Bohm and Imogen Moore",
    year = "2009",
    language = "English",
    volume = "16",
    pages = "579--583",
    journal = "International Journal of Learning",
    issn = "1447-9494",
    publisher = "Common Ground Publishing",
    number = "8",

    }

    Changing how science student think: an inquiry based approach. / Bohm, Margi; Moore, Imogen.

    In: The International Journal of Learning, Vol. 16, No. 8, 2009, p. 579-583.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Changing how science student think: an inquiry based approach

    AU - Bohm, Margi

    AU - Moore, Imogen

    PY - 2009

    Y1 - 2009

    N2 - Australian universities lament that first year science students fail to think creatively and have difficulty using logical reason in developing conclusions. Current literature goes further and suggests first year students cannot sustain any questioning of their opinions and show little regard for exposing hidden assumptions. This paper investigates preliminary findings of a three year project that follows a cohort of secondary students as they progress through a structured inquiry-based learning program that intends to produce students who think like scientists rather than school students. A group of 30, year 8, male students (13/14 year olds) generated ecological questions they wanted answered. The students hypothesised and then planned an investigation. Data was collected in the field and analysed. The students wrote a formal report that formed a scientific explanation of what they thought was happening. There was also formal assessment of the students in the form of an on-line test on ecology. The students' enthusiasm while working in the field was extremely high and they found examining new and unusual marine creatures under the microscope very interesting. The motivation for the students, though, was to produce a high standard PowerPoint presentation rather than enter a journey of discovery in trying to explain why certain animals lived in particular areas of the intertidal zone or what forces were driving the exposed and protected beaches. This is consistent with students learning to pass exams rather than thinking scientifically about a problem. The problem is how to shift the mindset of the student from thinking about a grade at the end of the year to engaging the student to think about a problem scientifically. The summative assessment showed the weaker students improved their retention of the subject content but there was no significant improvement for the stronger students. This may mean weaker students become more engaged within an inquiry-based structure

    AB - Australian universities lament that first year science students fail to think creatively and have difficulty using logical reason in developing conclusions. Current literature goes further and suggests first year students cannot sustain any questioning of their opinions and show little regard for exposing hidden assumptions. This paper investigates preliminary findings of a three year project that follows a cohort of secondary students as they progress through a structured inquiry-based learning program that intends to produce students who think like scientists rather than school students. A group of 30, year 8, male students (13/14 year olds) generated ecological questions they wanted answered. The students hypothesised and then planned an investigation. Data was collected in the field and analysed. The students wrote a formal report that formed a scientific explanation of what they thought was happening. There was also formal assessment of the students in the form of an on-line test on ecology. The students' enthusiasm while working in the field was extremely high and they found examining new and unusual marine creatures under the microscope very interesting. The motivation for the students, though, was to produce a high standard PowerPoint presentation rather than enter a journey of discovery in trying to explain why certain animals lived in particular areas of the intertidal zone or what forces were driving the exposed and protected beaches. This is consistent with students learning to pass exams rather than thinking scientifically about a problem. The problem is how to shift the mindset of the student from thinking about a grade at the end of the year to engaging the student to think about a problem scientifically. The summative assessment showed the weaker students improved their retention of the subject content but there was no significant improvement for the stronger students. This may mean weaker students become more engaged within an inquiry-based structure

    KW - inquiry-based

    KW - scientific method

    KW - thinking

    M3 - Article

    VL - 16

    SP - 579

    EP - 583

    JO - International Journal of Learning

    JF - International Journal of Learning

    SN - 1447-9494

    IS - 8

    ER -