Changing of the guard: moving from a war on weeds to an outcome-orientated weed management system

Paul Downey

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    7 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Weed management has been likened to a war â¿¿ the war on weeds. Whilst the concept of a war has created a sense of unity, supported by â¿¿propagandaâ¿¿ and emotive language, the campaign has been far from a success. In fact it has actually hampered weed management by maintaining a deep-seated emphasis on the act of killing weeds, rather than on the outcome of that killing â¿¿ an example of an outcome might be the response of native species that are threatened by a particular weed. In order to increase the effectiveness of weed management I argue that it is time for a changing of the guard or a transition from this so-called â¿¿war on weedsâ¿¿ to a new approach: one that is focused on the outcome, which is not a war. Whilst an outcome-orientated weed management system is not new, i.e. it has already been used in a few specific cases, it is distinctly different from the concept of a war, and more in line with the broader objectives of many weed management programs. In order to transition to an outcome-orientated weed management system several challenges need to be overcome, specifically around establishing appropriate goals and monitoring weed management programs. In addition we need to ensure policy is aligned with management and research. Lastly, some deeply entrenched individual and institutional views on weed management need to be overcome. None of the challenges outlined pose a significant barrier to a transition to an outcome-orientated approach. Given the failure of the war on weeds it is now time to make such a transition.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)86-91
    Number of pages6
    JournalPlant Protection Quarterly
    Volume26
    Issue number3
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Fingerprint

    management systems
    weed
    weed control
    weeds
    monitoring

    Cite this

    @article{e0bad3c3b0a140c788d1e9702a64d2a6,
    title = "Changing of the guard: moving from a war on weeds to an outcome-orientated weed management system",
    abstract = "Weed management has been likened to a war {\^a}¿¿ the war on weeds. Whilst the concept of a war has created a sense of unity, supported by {\^a}¿¿propaganda{\^a}¿¿ and emotive language, the campaign has been far from a success. In fact it has actually hampered weed management by maintaining a deep-seated emphasis on the act of killing weeds, rather than on the outcome of that killing {\^a}¿¿ an example of an outcome might be the response of native species that are threatened by a particular weed. In order to increase the effectiveness of weed management I argue that it is time for a changing of the guard or a transition from this so-called {\^a}¿¿war on weeds{\^a}¿¿ to a new approach: one that is focused on the outcome, which is not a war. Whilst an outcome-orientated weed management system is not new, i.e. it has already been used in a few specific cases, it is distinctly different from the concept of a war, and more in line with the broader objectives of many weed management programs. In order to transition to an outcome-orientated weed management system several challenges need to be overcome, specifically around establishing appropriate goals and monitoring weed management programs. In addition we need to ensure policy is aligned with management and research. Lastly, some deeply entrenched individual and institutional views on weed management need to be overcome. None of the challenges outlined pose a significant barrier to a transition to an outcome-orientated approach. Given the failure of the war on weeds it is now time to make such a transition.",
    author = "Paul Downey",
    year = "2011",
    language = "English",
    volume = "26",
    pages = "86--91",
    journal = "Plant Protection Quarterly",
    issn = "0815-2195",
    publisher = "Plant Protection Quarterly",
    number = "3",

    }

    Changing of the guard: moving from a war on weeds to an outcome-orientated weed management system. / Downey, Paul.

    In: Plant Protection Quarterly, Vol. 26, No. 3, 2011, p. 86-91.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Changing of the guard: moving from a war on weeds to an outcome-orientated weed management system

    AU - Downey, Paul

    PY - 2011

    Y1 - 2011

    N2 - Weed management has been likened to a war â¿¿ the war on weeds. Whilst the concept of a war has created a sense of unity, supported by â¿¿propagandaâ¿¿ and emotive language, the campaign has been far from a success. In fact it has actually hampered weed management by maintaining a deep-seated emphasis on the act of killing weeds, rather than on the outcome of that killing â¿¿ an example of an outcome might be the response of native species that are threatened by a particular weed. In order to increase the effectiveness of weed management I argue that it is time for a changing of the guard or a transition from this so-called â¿¿war on weedsâ¿¿ to a new approach: one that is focused on the outcome, which is not a war. Whilst an outcome-orientated weed management system is not new, i.e. it has already been used in a few specific cases, it is distinctly different from the concept of a war, and more in line with the broader objectives of many weed management programs. In order to transition to an outcome-orientated weed management system several challenges need to be overcome, specifically around establishing appropriate goals and monitoring weed management programs. In addition we need to ensure policy is aligned with management and research. Lastly, some deeply entrenched individual and institutional views on weed management need to be overcome. None of the challenges outlined pose a significant barrier to a transition to an outcome-orientated approach. Given the failure of the war on weeds it is now time to make such a transition.

    AB - Weed management has been likened to a war â¿¿ the war on weeds. Whilst the concept of a war has created a sense of unity, supported by â¿¿propagandaâ¿¿ and emotive language, the campaign has been far from a success. In fact it has actually hampered weed management by maintaining a deep-seated emphasis on the act of killing weeds, rather than on the outcome of that killing â¿¿ an example of an outcome might be the response of native species that are threatened by a particular weed. In order to increase the effectiveness of weed management I argue that it is time for a changing of the guard or a transition from this so-called â¿¿war on weedsâ¿¿ to a new approach: one that is focused on the outcome, which is not a war. Whilst an outcome-orientated weed management system is not new, i.e. it has already been used in a few specific cases, it is distinctly different from the concept of a war, and more in line with the broader objectives of many weed management programs. In order to transition to an outcome-orientated weed management system several challenges need to be overcome, specifically around establishing appropriate goals and monitoring weed management programs. In addition we need to ensure policy is aligned with management and research. Lastly, some deeply entrenched individual and institutional views on weed management need to be overcome. None of the challenges outlined pose a significant barrier to a transition to an outcome-orientated approach. Given the failure of the war on weeds it is now time to make such a transition.

    M3 - Article

    VL - 26

    SP - 86

    EP - 91

    JO - Plant Protection Quarterly

    JF - Plant Protection Quarterly

    SN - 0815-2195

    IS - 3

    ER -