Changing spaces of political encounter and the rise of anti-politics: Evidence from Mass Observation’s General Election diaries

Nick Clarke, Will Jennings, Jonathan Moss, Gerry STOKER

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    6 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Negativity towards the institutions of formal politics is currently a concern across much of the democratic world. It is generally agreed that such negativity increased among British citizens during the second half of the twentieth century. In this paper, we analyse a novel dataset not previously used to study this topic: Mass Observation's General Election diaries. Since diarists wrote mostly about politicians, political campaigns, and associated media coverage, we ask specifically what the diaries can tell us about increased negativity towards politicians and its relationship to developments in political communication. We take a postholing approach to sampling of the diaries, enabling comparative-static analysis between the middle and end of the twentieth century. We view the diaries in a geographical framework derived from contextual theories of social action. This gives us a focus on spaces of political encounter, modes of political interaction, performances by politicians, and judgements by citizens. We argue that prominent spaces of political encounter changed over the period from long radio speeches and rowdy political meetings to televised debates and associated expert commentary. We demonstrate how these latter settings for political interaction afforded less opportunity for politicians to perform virtues to citizens, and for citizens to calibrate judgements of politicians.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)13-23
    Number of pages11
    JournalPolitical Geography
    Volume56
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2017

    Fingerprint

    election
    politician
    politics
    citizen
    twentieth century
    evidence
    political communication
    interaction
    communication
    radio
    campaign
    coverage
    General Elections
    Rise
    Diary
    Mass Observation
    expert
    sampling
    Politicians
    performance

    Cite this

    @article{b8ef9b67ad874ad39702b4790d72f07d,
    title = "Changing spaces of political encounter and the rise of anti-politics: Evidence from Mass Observation’s General Election diaries",
    abstract = "Negativity towards the institutions of formal politics is currently a concern across much of the democratic world. It is generally agreed that such negativity increased among British citizens during the second half of the twentieth century. In this paper, we analyse a novel dataset not previously used to study this topic: Mass Observation's General Election diaries. Since diarists wrote mostly about politicians, political campaigns, and associated media coverage, we ask specifically what the diaries can tell us about increased negativity towards politicians and its relationship to developments in political communication. We take a postholing approach to sampling of the diaries, enabling comparative-static analysis between the middle and end of the twentieth century. We view the diaries in a geographical framework derived from contextual theories of social action. This gives us a focus on spaces of political encounter, modes of political interaction, performances by politicians, and judgements by citizens. We argue that prominent spaces of political encounter changed over the period from long radio speeches and rowdy political meetings to televised debates and associated expert commentary. We demonstrate how these latter settings for political interaction afforded less opportunity for politicians to perform virtues to citizens, and for citizens to calibrate judgements of politicians.",
    keywords = "Politics, Anti-politics, Elections, United Kingdom, Mass Observation",
    author = "Nick Clarke and Will Jennings and Jonathan Moss and Gerry STOKER",
    year = "2017",
    doi = "10.1016/j.polgeo.2016.10.004",
    language = "English",
    volume = "56",
    pages = "13--23",
    journal = "Political Geography Quarterly",
    issn = "0962-6298",
    publisher = "Elsevier BV",

    }

    Changing spaces of political encounter and the rise of anti-politics: Evidence from Mass Observation’s General Election diaries. / Clarke, Nick; Jennings, Will; Moss, Jonathan; STOKER, Gerry.

    In: Political Geography, Vol. 56, 2017, p. 13-23.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Changing spaces of political encounter and the rise of anti-politics: Evidence from Mass Observation’s General Election diaries

    AU - Clarke, Nick

    AU - Jennings, Will

    AU - Moss, Jonathan

    AU - STOKER, Gerry

    PY - 2017

    Y1 - 2017

    N2 - Negativity towards the institutions of formal politics is currently a concern across much of the democratic world. It is generally agreed that such negativity increased among British citizens during the second half of the twentieth century. In this paper, we analyse a novel dataset not previously used to study this topic: Mass Observation's General Election diaries. Since diarists wrote mostly about politicians, political campaigns, and associated media coverage, we ask specifically what the diaries can tell us about increased negativity towards politicians and its relationship to developments in political communication. We take a postholing approach to sampling of the diaries, enabling comparative-static analysis between the middle and end of the twentieth century. We view the diaries in a geographical framework derived from contextual theories of social action. This gives us a focus on spaces of political encounter, modes of political interaction, performances by politicians, and judgements by citizens. We argue that prominent spaces of political encounter changed over the period from long radio speeches and rowdy political meetings to televised debates and associated expert commentary. We demonstrate how these latter settings for political interaction afforded less opportunity for politicians to perform virtues to citizens, and for citizens to calibrate judgements of politicians.

    AB - Negativity towards the institutions of formal politics is currently a concern across much of the democratic world. It is generally agreed that such negativity increased among British citizens during the second half of the twentieth century. In this paper, we analyse a novel dataset not previously used to study this topic: Mass Observation's General Election diaries. Since diarists wrote mostly about politicians, political campaigns, and associated media coverage, we ask specifically what the diaries can tell us about increased negativity towards politicians and its relationship to developments in political communication. We take a postholing approach to sampling of the diaries, enabling comparative-static analysis between the middle and end of the twentieth century. We view the diaries in a geographical framework derived from contextual theories of social action. This gives us a focus on spaces of political encounter, modes of political interaction, performances by politicians, and judgements by citizens. We argue that prominent spaces of political encounter changed over the period from long radio speeches and rowdy political meetings to televised debates and associated expert commentary. We demonstrate how these latter settings for political interaction afforded less opportunity for politicians to perform virtues to citizens, and for citizens to calibrate judgements of politicians.

    KW - Politics

    KW - Anti-politics

    KW - Elections

    KW - United Kingdom

    KW - Mass Observation

    U2 - 10.1016/j.polgeo.2016.10.004

    DO - 10.1016/j.polgeo.2016.10.004

    M3 - Article

    VL - 56

    SP - 13

    EP - 23

    JO - Political Geography Quarterly

    JF - Political Geography Quarterly

    SN - 0962-6298

    ER -