Abstract
This study examined the reliability and validity of the Childbirth Self-Efficacy Inventory (CBSEI) (Lowe 1993) in a sample of 100 Australian women. Consistent with US data, the measure was shown to have high internal consistency. Validity of the instrument was determined by applying self-efficacy theory (Bandura 1982), which predicts that parity should have the largest effect on childbirth self-efficacy, followed by knowledge, then support and finally anxiety. Results revealed that having a prior good birth experience and knowledge about childbirth had significant effects on childbirth self-efficacy. A factor analysis was performed to determine whether the original factor structure of this instrument held for Australian women. While outcome expectancies and self-efficacy expectancies emerged as distinct factors, the results showed that Australian women did not differentiate between active and second-stage labour. Rather than the two stages of labour emerging as dimensions of the CBSEI, two externally focused coping strategies were revealed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 613-622 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Journal of Advanced Nursing |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1997 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Childbirth confidence: Validating the childbirth self-efficacy inventory (CBSEI) in an Australian sample'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver