Children’s Court Magistrates’ Views of Restorative Justice and Therapeutic Jurisprudence Measures for Young Offenders

Kelly Richards, Lorana BARTELS, Jane Bolitho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Restorative justice and therapeutic jurisprudence measures have recently been introduced into youth justice systems. As gatekeepers to these measures, Children’s Court magistrates play a crucial role in their success. However, little research has been undertaken on magistrates’ views of these measures. This article addresses this gap by presenting results of interviews undertaken with Children’s Court magistrates in New South Wales, Australia. Our research suggests that magistrates are enthusiastic about the philosophy of both restorative and therapeutic measures, but are reluctant to embrace them if they consider them underresourced, poorly understood and/or poorly implemented. The implications of these findings are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-19
Number of pages19
JournalYouth Justice
Volume1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Social Justice
Jurisprudence
jurisprudence
offender
justice
South Australia
New South Wales
gatekeeper
Research
Interviews
Therapeutics
interview
philosophy

Cite this

@article{6ea64327b7c8472c8c864eed074ede12,
title = "Children’s Court Magistrates’ Views of Restorative Justice and Therapeutic Jurisprudence Measures for Young Offenders",
abstract = "Restorative justice and therapeutic jurisprudence measures have recently been introduced into youth justice systems. As gatekeepers to these measures, Children’s Court magistrates play a crucial role in their success. However, little research has been undertaken on magistrates’ views of these measures. This article addresses this gap by presenting results of interviews undertaken with Children’s Court magistrates in New South Wales, Australia. Our research suggests that magistrates are enthusiastic about the philosophy of both restorative and therapeutic measures, but are reluctant to embrace them if they consider them underresourced, poorly understood and/or poorly implemented. The implications of these findings are discussed.",
keywords = "Children’s Court magistrates, problem-solving courts, restorative justice, therapeutic jurisprudence, youth, justice conferencing, youth offending",
author = "Kelly Richards and Lorana BARTELS and Jane Bolitho",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1177/1473225416665612",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "1--19",
journal = "Youth Justice",
issn = "1473-2254",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

Children’s Court Magistrates’ Views of Restorative Justice and Therapeutic Jurisprudence Measures for Young Offenders. / Richards, Kelly; BARTELS, Lorana; Bolitho, Jane.

In: Youth Justice, Vol. 1, 2017, p. 1-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Children’s Court Magistrates’ Views of Restorative Justice and Therapeutic Jurisprudence Measures for Young Offenders

AU - Richards, Kelly

AU - BARTELS, Lorana

AU - Bolitho, Jane

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Restorative justice and therapeutic jurisprudence measures have recently been introduced into youth justice systems. As gatekeepers to these measures, Children’s Court magistrates play a crucial role in their success. However, little research has been undertaken on magistrates’ views of these measures. This article addresses this gap by presenting results of interviews undertaken with Children’s Court magistrates in New South Wales, Australia. Our research suggests that magistrates are enthusiastic about the philosophy of both restorative and therapeutic measures, but are reluctant to embrace them if they consider them underresourced, poorly understood and/or poorly implemented. The implications of these findings are discussed.

AB - Restorative justice and therapeutic jurisprudence measures have recently been introduced into youth justice systems. As gatekeepers to these measures, Children’s Court magistrates play a crucial role in their success. However, little research has been undertaken on magistrates’ views of these measures. This article addresses this gap by presenting results of interviews undertaken with Children’s Court magistrates in New South Wales, Australia. Our research suggests that magistrates are enthusiastic about the philosophy of both restorative and therapeutic measures, but are reluctant to embrace them if they consider them underresourced, poorly understood and/or poorly implemented. The implications of these findings are discussed.

KW - Children’s Court magistrates

KW - problem-solving courts

KW - restorative justice

KW - therapeutic jurisprudence

KW - youth

KW - justice conferencing

KW - youth offending

U2 - 10.1177/1473225416665612

DO - 10.1177/1473225416665612

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 1

EP - 19

JO - Youth Justice

JF - Youth Justice

SN - 1473-2254

ER -