Chipping away

non-consumer researcher perspectives on barriers to collaborating with consumers in mental health research

Brenda Happell, Sarah Gordon, Julia Bocking, Pete Ellis, Cath Roper, Jackie Liggins, Brett Scholz, Chris Platania-Phung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Collaboration between researchers who have lived experience of mental illness and services (consumer researchers) and mental health researchers without (other mental health researchers) is an emergent development in research. Inclusion of consumer perspectives is crucial to ensuring the ethics, relevancy and validity of mental health research; yet widespread and embedded consumer collaboration of this nature is known to be impeded by attitudinal and organisational factors. Limited research describes consumer researchers’ experiences of barriers. Other mental health researchers are key players in the co-production process yet there is also a paucity of research reporting their views on barriers to collaborating with consumers. Aims: To explore other researchers’ views and experiences on partnering with consumer mental health researchers in Australia and New Zealand. Methods: Exploratory qualitative design. Eleven semi-structured interviews were conducted with mental health researchers. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed. Results: Four themes concerning barriers to collaborating with consumers (hierarchies, status quo, not understanding, paternalism), and one theme on addressing the barriers (constantly chipping away) were identified. Conclusions: It is suggested that multifaceted strategies for advancing collaboration with consumers are most effective. It is imperative to attend to several barriers simultaneously to redress the inherent power disparity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-7
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Mental Health
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 28 Apr 2018

Fingerprint

Mental Health
Research Personnel
Research
Paternalism
Interviews
New Zealand
Ethics

Cite this

Happell, Brenda ; Gordon, Sarah ; Bocking, Julia ; Ellis, Pete ; Roper, Cath ; Liggins, Jackie ; Scholz, Brett ; Platania-Phung, Chris. / Chipping away : non-consumer researcher perspectives on barriers to collaborating with consumers in mental health research. In: Journal of Mental Health. 2018 ; pp. 1-7.
@article{9207fa2f59d7421a937ccd043fd76843,
title = "Chipping away: non-consumer researcher perspectives on barriers to collaborating with consumers in mental health research",
abstract = "Background: Collaboration between researchers who have lived experience of mental illness and services (consumer researchers) and mental health researchers without (other mental health researchers) is an emergent development in research. Inclusion of consumer perspectives is crucial to ensuring the ethics, relevancy and validity of mental health research; yet widespread and embedded consumer collaboration of this nature is known to be impeded by attitudinal and organisational factors. Limited research describes consumer researchers’ experiences of barriers. Other mental health researchers are key players in the co-production process yet there is also a paucity of research reporting their views on barriers to collaborating with consumers. Aims: To explore other researchers’ views and experiences on partnering with consumer mental health researchers in Australia and New Zealand. Methods: Exploratory qualitative design. Eleven semi-structured interviews were conducted with mental health researchers. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed. Results: Four themes concerning barriers to collaborating with consumers (hierarchies, status quo, not understanding, paternalism), and one theme on addressing the barriers (constantly chipping away) were identified. Conclusions: It is suggested that multifaceted strategies for advancing collaboration with consumers are most effective. It is imperative to attend to several barriers simultaneously to redress the inherent power disparity.",
keywords = "Barriers, consumers, lived experience, mental health, researchers",
author = "Brenda Happell and Sarah Gordon and Julia Bocking and Pete Ellis and Cath Roper and Jackie Liggins and Brett Scholz and Chris Platania-Phung",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1080/09638237.2018.1466051",
language = "English",
pages = "1--7",
journal = "Journal of Mental Health",
issn = "0963-8237",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",

}

Chipping away : non-consumer researcher perspectives on barriers to collaborating with consumers in mental health research. / Happell, Brenda; Gordon, Sarah; Bocking, Julia; Ellis, Pete; Roper, Cath; Liggins, Jackie; Scholz, Brett; Platania-Phung, Chris.

In: Journal of Mental Health, 28.04.2018, p. 1-7.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Chipping away

T2 - non-consumer researcher perspectives on barriers to collaborating with consumers in mental health research

AU - Happell, Brenda

AU - Gordon, Sarah

AU - Bocking, Julia

AU - Ellis, Pete

AU - Roper, Cath

AU - Liggins, Jackie

AU - Scholz, Brett

AU - Platania-Phung, Chris

PY - 2018/4/28

Y1 - 2018/4/28

N2 - Background: Collaboration between researchers who have lived experience of mental illness and services (consumer researchers) and mental health researchers without (other mental health researchers) is an emergent development in research. Inclusion of consumer perspectives is crucial to ensuring the ethics, relevancy and validity of mental health research; yet widespread and embedded consumer collaboration of this nature is known to be impeded by attitudinal and organisational factors. Limited research describes consumer researchers’ experiences of barriers. Other mental health researchers are key players in the co-production process yet there is also a paucity of research reporting their views on barriers to collaborating with consumers. Aims: To explore other researchers’ views and experiences on partnering with consumer mental health researchers in Australia and New Zealand. Methods: Exploratory qualitative design. Eleven semi-structured interviews were conducted with mental health researchers. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed. Results: Four themes concerning barriers to collaborating with consumers (hierarchies, status quo, not understanding, paternalism), and one theme on addressing the barriers (constantly chipping away) were identified. Conclusions: It is suggested that multifaceted strategies for advancing collaboration with consumers are most effective. It is imperative to attend to several barriers simultaneously to redress the inherent power disparity.

AB - Background: Collaboration between researchers who have lived experience of mental illness and services (consumer researchers) and mental health researchers without (other mental health researchers) is an emergent development in research. Inclusion of consumer perspectives is crucial to ensuring the ethics, relevancy and validity of mental health research; yet widespread and embedded consumer collaboration of this nature is known to be impeded by attitudinal and organisational factors. Limited research describes consumer researchers’ experiences of barriers. Other mental health researchers are key players in the co-production process yet there is also a paucity of research reporting their views on barriers to collaborating with consumers. Aims: To explore other researchers’ views and experiences on partnering with consumer mental health researchers in Australia and New Zealand. Methods: Exploratory qualitative design. Eleven semi-structured interviews were conducted with mental health researchers. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed. Results: Four themes concerning barriers to collaborating with consumers (hierarchies, status quo, not understanding, paternalism), and one theme on addressing the barriers (constantly chipping away) were identified. Conclusions: It is suggested that multifaceted strategies for advancing collaboration with consumers are most effective. It is imperative to attend to several barriers simultaneously to redress the inherent power disparity.

KW - Barriers

KW - consumers

KW - lived experience

KW - mental health

KW - researchers

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046098010&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09638237.2018.1466051

DO - 10.1080/09638237.2018.1466051

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 7

JO - Journal of Mental Health

JF - Journal of Mental Health

SN - 0963-8237

ER -