TY - JOUR
T1 - Chronic ankle instability affects learning rate during repeated proprioception testing
AU - WITCHALLS, Jeremy
AU - WADDINGTON, Gordon
AU - Adams, Roger
AU - Blanch, Peter
N1 - Funding Information:
Jeremy Witchalls was supported by an APA government scholarship, administered by the University of Canberra and the Australian Institute of Sport, during the conduct of this study.
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - Objectives: 1. To determine whether individuals with chronic ankle instability (CAI) have lower proprioception sensitivity scores from a test on the Active Movement Extent Discrimination Apparatus (AMEDA). 2. To determine whether individuals with CAI can improve proprioception sensitivity scores with repeated active movement testing using the AMEDA. 3. To assess the test-retest reliability of the AMEDA. Design: A cohort study comparing those with CAI or healthy ankles. Setting: University clinical laboratory. Participants: 61 healthy university students, 36 with CAI, 25 with stable ankles. Main outcome measures: A 2-way ANOVA was conducted to compare performance of CAI and stable ankle groups, over 3 test repetitions on the AMEDA. The reliability intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was obtained for test repetitions. Results: The scores improved in both groups when the AMEDA test was repeated ( p=<0.001). The rates of improvement in proprioception test scores differed, with the CAI group showing a slower learning rate than the stable ankle group ( p=0.047). The ICC for the whole group across the three trials was 0.80 (95% CI=0.69 to 0.87, p=<0.001). Conclusions: CAI participants improve their proprioception scores more slowly upon repeated AMEDA testing, suggesting differences in learning strategies.
AB - Objectives: 1. To determine whether individuals with chronic ankle instability (CAI) have lower proprioception sensitivity scores from a test on the Active Movement Extent Discrimination Apparatus (AMEDA). 2. To determine whether individuals with CAI can improve proprioception sensitivity scores with repeated active movement testing using the AMEDA. 3. To assess the test-retest reliability of the AMEDA. Design: A cohort study comparing those with CAI or healthy ankles. Setting: University clinical laboratory. Participants: 61 healthy university students, 36 with CAI, 25 with stable ankles. Main outcome measures: A 2-way ANOVA was conducted to compare performance of CAI and stable ankle groups, over 3 test repetitions on the AMEDA. The reliability intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was obtained for test repetitions. Results: The scores improved in both groups when the AMEDA test was repeated ( p=<0.001). The rates of improvement in proprioception test scores differed, with the CAI group showing a slower learning rate than the stable ankle group ( p=0.047). The ICC for the whole group across the three trials was 0.80 (95% CI=0.69 to 0.87, p=<0.001). Conclusions: CAI participants improve their proprioception scores more slowly upon repeated AMEDA testing, suggesting differences in learning strategies.
KW - Ankle
KW - Proprioception
KW - Psychometrics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898542586&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/chronic-ankle-instability-affects-learning-rate-during-repeated-proprioception-testing
U2 - 10.1016/j.ptsp.2013.04.002
DO - 10.1016/j.ptsp.2013.04.002
M3 - Article
SN - 1466-853X
VL - 15
SP - 106
EP - 111
JO - Physical Therapy in Sport
JF - Physical Therapy in Sport
IS - 2
ER -