TY - JOUR
T1 - Clearing of native vegetation in Queensland
T2 - An analysis of finalised prosecutions over a 10-year period (2007–2018)
AU - Hamman, Evan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Thomson Reuters (Professional) Australia Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - In addition to feral pests and climate change, land clearing has been one of the biggest drivers of biodiversity loss in Australia. Historically, the State of Queensland has led the nation in terms of rates of clearing and the resultant species loss. In the 1990s, laws restricting clearing on both freehold and leasehold land were introduced by the State government. The approach has been controversial, to say the least, and the legal framework continues to be amended on an almost annual basis. This article presents an analysis of finalised prosecutions brought by the regulator over a 10-year period (2007– 2018). The results indicate that while the total amount of fines have been steadily increasing, the numbers of prosecutions since 2013 have dropped remarkably.
AB - In addition to feral pests and climate change, land clearing has been one of the biggest drivers of biodiversity loss in Australia. Historically, the State of Queensland has led the nation in terms of rates of clearing and the resultant species loss. In the 1990s, laws restricting clearing on both freehold and leasehold land were introduced by the State government. The approach has been controversial, to say the least, and the legal framework continues to be amended on an almost annual basis. This article presents an analysis of finalised prosecutions brought by the regulator over a 10-year period (2007– 2018). The results indicate that while the total amount of fines have been steadily increasing, the numbers of prosecutions since 2013 have dropped remarkably.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081663023&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85081663023
SN - 0813-300X
VL - 36
SP - 658
EP - 673
JO - Environmental and Planning Law Journal
JF - Environmental and Planning Law Journal
IS - 6
ER -