Climate change from a distance

An analysis of construal level and psychological distance from climate change

Susie Wang, Mark Hurlstone, Zoe Leviston, Iain WALKER, Carmen Lawrence

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
9 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The public perception of climate change as abstract and distant may undermine climate action. According to construal level theory, whether a phenomenon is perceived as psychologically distant or close is associated with whether it is construed as abstract or concrete, respectively. Previous work has established a link between psychological distance and climate action, but the associated role of construal level has yet to be explored in depth. In two representative surveys of Australians (N = 217 and N = 216), and one experiment (N = 319), we tested whether construal level and psychological distance from climate change predicted pro-environmental intentions and policy support, and whether manipulating distance and construal increased pro-environmental behaviors such as donations. Results showed that psychological closeness to climate change predicted more engagement in pro-environmental behaviors, while construal level produced inconsistent results, and manipulations of both variables failed to produce increases in pro-environmental behaviors. In contrast with the central tenet of construal level theory, construal level was unrelated to psychological distance in all three studies. Our findings suggest that the hypothesized relationship between construal level and psychological distance may not hold in the context of climate change, and that it may be difficult to change pro-environmental behavior by manipulating these variables.
Original languageEnglish
Article number230
Pages (from-to)1-22
Number of pages22
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume10
Issue numberFEB
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Feb 2019

Fingerprint

Climate Change
Psychology
Climate
Environmental Policy

Cite this

Wang, Susie ; Hurlstone, Mark ; Leviston, Zoe ; WALKER, Iain ; Lawrence, Carmen. / Climate change from a distance : An analysis of construal level and psychological distance from climate change. In: Frontiers in Psychology. 2019 ; Vol. 10, No. FEB. pp. 1-22.
@article{e90de82a10964df69605fa0dbeb05e22,
title = "Climate change from a distance: An analysis of construal level and psychological distance from climate change",
abstract = "The public perception of climate change as abstract and distant may undermine climate action. According to construal level theory, whether a phenomenon is perceived as psychologically distant or close is associated with whether it is construed as abstract or concrete, respectively. Previous work has established a link between psychological distance and climate action, but the associated role of construal level has yet to be explored in depth. In two representative surveys of Australians (N = 217 and N = 216), and one experiment (N = 319), we tested whether construal level and psychological distance from climate change predicted pro-environmental intentions and policy support, and whether manipulating distance and construal increased pro-environmental behaviors such as donations. Results showed that psychological closeness to climate change predicted more engagement in pro-environmental behaviors, while construal level produced inconsistent results, and manipulations of both variables failed to produce increases in pro-environmental behaviors. In contrast with the central tenet of construal level theory, construal level was unrelated to psychological distance in all three studies. Our findings suggest that the hypothesized relationship between construal level and psychological distance may not hold in the context of climate change, and that it may be difficult to change pro-environmental behavior by manipulating these variables.",
keywords = "Climate change, Climate change policy, Construal level theory, Donation behavior, Pro-environmental behavior, Psychological distance, Time perspective",
author = "Susie Wang and Mark Hurlstone and Zoe Leviston and Iain WALKER and Carmen Lawrence",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "22",
doi = "10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00230",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "1--22",
journal = "Frontiers in Psychology",
issn = "1664-1078",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S.A.",
number = "FEB",

}

Climate change from a distance : An analysis of construal level and psychological distance from climate change. / Wang, Susie; Hurlstone, Mark; Leviston, Zoe; WALKER, Iain; Lawrence, Carmen.

In: Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 10, No. FEB, 230, 22.02.2019, p. 1-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Climate change from a distance

T2 - An analysis of construal level and psychological distance from climate change

AU - Wang, Susie

AU - Hurlstone, Mark

AU - Leviston, Zoe

AU - WALKER, Iain

AU - Lawrence, Carmen

PY - 2019/2/22

Y1 - 2019/2/22

N2 - The public perception of climate change as abstract and distant may undermine climate action. According to construal level theory, whether a phenomenon is perceived as psychologically distant or close is associated with whether it is construed as abstract or concrete, respectively. Previous work has established a link between psychological distance and climate action, but the associated role of construal level has yet to be explored in depth. In two representative surveys of Australians (N = 217 and N = 216), and one experiment (N = 319), we tested whether construal level and psychological distance from climate change predicted pro-environmental intentions and policy support, and whether manipulating distance and construal increased pro-environmental behaviors such as donations. Results showed that psychological closeness to climate change predicted more engagement in pro-environmental behaviors, while construal level produced inconsistent results, and manipulations of both variables failed to produce increases in pro-environmental behaviors. In contrast with the central tenet of construal level theory, construal level was unrelated to psychological distance in all three studies. Our findings suggest that the hypothesized relationship between construal level and psychological distance may not hold in the context of climate change, and that it may be difficult to change pro-environmental behavior by manipulating these variables.

AB - The public perception of climate change as abstract and distant may undermine climate action. According to construal level theory, whether a phenomenon is perceived as psychologically distant or close is associated with whether it is construed as abstract or concrete, respectively. Previous work has established a link between psychological distance and climate action, but the associated role of construal level has yet to be explored in depth. In two representative surveys of Australians (N = 217 and N = 216), and one experiment (N = 319), we tested whether construal level and psychological distance from climate change predicted pro-environmental intentions and policy support, and whether manipulating distance and construal increased pro-environmental behaviors such as donations. Results showed that psychological closeness to climate change predicted more engagement in pro-environmental behaviors, while construal level produced inconsistent results, and manipulations of both variables failed to produce increases in pro-environmental behaviors. In contrast with the central tenet of construal level theory, construal level was unrelated to psychological distance in all three studies. Our findings suggest that the hypothesized relationship between construal level and psychological distance may not hold in the context of climate change, and that it may be difficult to change pro-environmental behavior by manipulating these variables.

KW - Climate change

KW - Climate change policy

KW - Construal level theory

KW - Donation behavior

KW - Pro-environmental behavior

KW - Psychological distance

KW - Time perspective

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064399537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00230

DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00230

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 1

EP - 22

JO - Frontiers in Psychology

JF - Frontiers in Psychology

SN - 1664-1078

IS - FEB

M1 - 230

ER -