Climate, food, density and wildlife population growth rate

Jim Hone, Tim H. Clutton-Brock

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    42 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The aim of this study was to derive and evaluate a priori models of the relationship between annual instantaneous population growth rate (r) and climate. These were derived from the numerical response of annual r and food, and the effect of climate on a parameter in the numerical response. The goodness of fit of a range of such deductive models to data on annual r of Soay sheep and red deer were evaluated using information-theoretic (AICc-based) analyses.2The analysis for sheep annual r showed negative effects of abundance and negative effects of the interaction of abundance and climate, measured as March rainfall (and winter NAO) in the best fitting models. The analysis for deer annual r showed a negative effect of deer abundance and a positive effect of climate measured as March rainfall (but a negative effect of winter NAO), but no interaction of abundance and climate in the best fitting models.3There was most support in the analysis of sheep dynamics for the ratio numerical response and the assumption that parameter J (equilibrium food per animal) was influenced by climate. In the analysis of deer dynamics there was most support for the numerical responses assuming effects of food and density (Ivlev and density, food and density, and additive responses) and slightly less support for the ratio numerical response. The evaluation of such models would be aided by the collection of and incorporation of food data into the analyses
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)361-367
    Number of pages7
    JournalJournal of Animal Ecology
    Volume76
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2007

    Fingerprint

    numerical response
    population growth
    wildlife
    climate
    food
    deer
    sheep
    Soay
    rain
    winter
    rainfall
    Cervus elaphus
    effect
    analysis
    animal
    animals

    Cite this

    Hone, Jim ; Clutton-Brock, Tim H. / Climate, food, density and wildlife population growth rate. In: Journal of Animal Ecology. 2007 ; Vol. 76, No. 2. pp. 361-367.
    @article{0d9b2c8cf849421595f0a1c1c27b200d,
    title = "Climate, food, density and wildlife population growth rate",
    abstract = "The aim of this study was to derive and evaluate a priori models of the relationship between annual instantaneous population growth rate (r) and climate. These were derived from the numerical response of annual r and food, and the effect of climate on a parameter in the numerical response. The goodness of fit of a range of such deductive models to data on annual r of Soay sheep and red deer were evaluated using information-theoretic (AICc-based) analyses.2The analysis for sheep annual r showed negative effects of abundance and negative effects of the interaction of abundance and climate, measured as March rainfall (and winter NAO) in the best fitting models. The analysis for deer annual r showed a negative effect of deer abundance and a positive effect of climate measured as March rainfall (but a negative effect of winter NAO), but no interaction of abundance and climate in the best fitting models.3There was most support in the analysis of sheep dynamics for the ratio numerical response and the assumption that parameter J (equilibrium food per animal) was influenced by climate. In the analysis of deer dynamics there was most support for the numerical responses assuming effects of food and density (Ivlev and density, food and density, and additive responses) and slightly less support for the ratio numerical response. The evaluation of such models would be aided by the collection of and incorporation of food data into the analyses",
    author = "Jim Hone and Clutton-Brock, {Tim H.}",
    year = "2007",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01200.x",
    language = "English",
    volume = "76",
    pages = "361--367",
    journal = "Journal of Animal Ecology",
    issn = "0021-8790",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "2",

    }

    Climate, food, density and wildlife population growth rate. / Hone, Jim; Clutton-Brock, Tim H.

    In: Journal of Animal Ecology, Vol. 76, No. 2, 2007, p. 361-367.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Climate, food, density and wildlife population growth rate

    AU - Hone, Jim

    AU - Clutton-Brock, Tim H.

    PY - 2007

    Y1 - 2007

    N2 - The aim of this study was to derive and evaluate a priori models of the relationship between annual instantaneous population growth rate (r) and climate. These were derived from the numerical response of annual r and food, and the effect of climate on a parameter in the numerical response. The goodness of fit of a range of such deductive models to data on annual r of Soay sheep and red deer were evaluated using information-theoretic (AICc-based) analyses.2The analysis for sheep annual r showed negative effects of abundance and negative effects of the interaction of abundance and climate, measured as March rainfall (and winter NAO) in the best fitting models. The analysis for deer annual r showed a negative effect of deer abundance and a positive effect of climate measured as March rainfall (but a negative effect of winter NAO), but no interaction of abundance and climate in the best fitting models.3There was most support in the analysis of sheep dynamics for the ratio numerical response and the assumption that parameter J (equilibrium food per animal) was influenced by climate. In the analysis of deer dynamics there was most support for the numerical responses assuming effects of food and density (Ivlev and density, food and density, and additive responses) and slightly less support for the ratio numerical response. The evaluation of such models would be aided by the collection of and incorporation of food data into the analyses

    AB - The aim of this study was to derive and evaluate a priori models of the relationship between annual instantaneous population growth rate (r) and climate. These were derived from the numerical response of annual r and food, and the effect of climate on a parameter in the numerical response. The goodness of fit of a range of such deductive models to data on annual r of Soay sheep and red deer were evaluated using information-theoretic (AICc-based) analyses.2The analysis for sheep annual r showed negative effects of abundance and negative effects of the interaction of abundance and climate, measured as March rainfall (and winter NAO) in the best fitting models. The analysis for deer annual r showed a negative effect of deer abundance and a positive effect of climate measured as March rainfall (but a negative effect of winter NAO), but no interaction of abundance and climate in the best fitting models.3There was most support in the analysis of sheep dynamics for the ratio numerical response and the assumption that parameter J (equilibrium food per animal) was influenced by climate. In the analysis of deer dynamics there was most support for the numerical responses assuming effects of food and density (Ivlev and density, food and density, and additive responses) and slightly less support for the ratio numerical response. The evaluation of such models would be aided by the collection of and incorporation of food data into the analyses

    U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01200.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01200.x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 76

    SP - 361

    EP - 367

    JO - Journal of Animal Ecology

    JF - Journal of Animal Ecology

    SN - 0021-8790

    IS - 2

    ER -