Clinicians’ perspectives of therapeutic alliance in face-to-face and telepractice speech–language pathology sessions

Anneka Freckmann, Monique Hines, Michelle Lincoln

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the face validity of a measure of therapeutic alliance for paediatric speech–language pathology and to determine whether a difference exists in therapeutic alliance reported by speech–language pathologists (SLPs) conducting face-to-face sessions, compared with telepractice SLPs or in their ratings of confidence with technology. Method: SLPs conducting telepractice (n = 14) or face-to-face therapy (n = 18) completed an online survey which included the Therapeutic Alliance Scales for Children–Revised (TASC-r) (Therapist Form) to rate clinicians’ perceptions of rapport with up to three clients. Participants also reported their overall perception of rapport with each client and their comfort with technology. Result: There was a strong correlation between TASC-r total scores and overall ratings of rapport, providing preliminary evidence of TASC-r face validity. There was no significant difference between TASC-r scores for telepractice and face-to-face therapy (p = 0.961), nor face-to-face and telepractice SLPs’ confidence with familiar (p = 0.414) or unfamiliar technology (p = 0.780). Conclusion: The TASC-r may be a promising tool for measuring therapeutic alliance in speech–language pathology. Telepractice does not appear to have a negative effect on rapport between SLPs and paediatric clients. Future research is required to identify how SLPs develop rapport in telepractice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)287-296
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 May 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pathology
Therapeutics
Technology
Reproducibility of Results
Clinicians
Alliances
Pediatrics
Speech-language Pathologists
Rapport
Pathologists
Confidence
Rating
Therapy
Conducting

Cite this

@article{e7cb8a87ba5b45beaec53d58c43dc1a5,
title = "Clinicians’ perspectives of therapeutic alliance in face-to-face and telepractice speech–language pathology sessions",
abstract = "Purpose: To investigate the face validity of a measure of therapeutic alliance for paediatric speech–language pathology and to determine whether a difference exists in therapeutic alliance reported by speech–language pathologists (SLPs) conducting face-to-face sessions, compared with telepractice SLPs or in their ratings of confidence with technology. Method: SLPs conducting telepractice (n = 14) or face-to-face therapy (n = 18) completed an online survey which included the Therapeutic Alliance Scales for Children–Revised (TASC-r) (Therapist Form) to rate clinicians’ perceptions of rapport with up to three clients. Participants also reported their overall perception of rapport with each client and their comfort with technology. Result: There was a strong correlation between TASC-r total scores and overall ratings of rapport, providing preliminary evidence of TASC-r face validity. There was no significant difference between TASC-r scores for telepractice and face-to-face therapy (p = 0.961), nor face-to-face and telepractice SLPs’ confidence with familiar (p = 0.414) or unfamiliar technology (p = 0.780). Conclusion: The TASC-r may be a promising tool for measuring therapeutic alliance in speech–language pathology. Telepractice does not appear to have a negative effect on rapport between SLPs and paediatric clients. Future research is required to identify how SLPs develop rapport in telepractice.",
keywords = "clinician–client relationship, speech–language pathologist, telehealth",
author = "Anneka Freckmann and Monique Hines and Michelle Lincoln",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/17549507.2017.1292547",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "287--296",
journal = "Advances in Speech Language Pathology",
issn = "1441-7049",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "3",

}

Clinicians’ perspectives of therapeutic alliance in face-to-face and telepractice speech–language pathology sessions. / Freckmann, Anneka; Hines, Monique; Lincoln, Michelle.

In: International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, Vol. 19, No. 3, 04.05.2017, p. 287-296.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinicians’ perspectives of therapeutic alliance in face-to-face and telepractice speech–language pathology sessions

AU - Freckmann, Anneka

AU - Hines, Monique

AU - Lincoln, Michelle

PY - 2017/5/4

Y1 - 2017/5/4

N2 - Purpose: To investigate the face validity of a measure of therapeutic alliance for paediatric speech–language pathology and to determine whether a difference exists in therapeutic alliance reported by speech–language pathologists (SLPs) conducting face-to-face sessions, compared with telepractice SLPs or in their ratings of confidence with technology. Method: SLPs conducting telepractice (n = 14) or face-to-face therapy (n = 18) completed an online survey which included the Therapeutic Alliance Scales for Children–Revised (TASC-r) (Therapist Form) to rate clinicians’ perceptions of rapport with up to three clients. Participants also reported their overall perception of rapport with each client and their comfort with technology. Result: There was a strong correlation between TASC-r total scores and overall ratings of rapport, providing preliminary evidence of TASC-r face validity. There was no significant difference between TASC-r scores for telepractice and face-to-face therapy (p = 0.961), nor face-to-face and telepractice SLPs’ confidence with familiar (p = 0.414) or unfamiliar technology (p = 0.780). Conclusion: The TASC-r may be a promising tool for measuring therapeutic alliance in speech–language pathology. Telepractice does not appear to have a negative effect on rapport between SLPs and paediatric clients. Future research is required to identify how SLPs develop rapport in telepractice.

AB - Purpose: To investigate the face validity of a measure of therapeutic alliance for paediatric speech–language pathology and to determine whether a difference exists in therapeutic alliance reported by speech–language pathologists (SLPs) conducting face-to-face sessions, compared with telepractice SLPs or in their ratings of confidence with technology. Method: SLPs conducting telepractice (n = 14) or face-to-face therapy (n = 18) completed an online survey which included the Therapeutic Alliance Scales for Children–Revised (TASC-r) (Therapist Form) to rate clinicians’ perceptions of rapport with up to three clients. Participants also reported their overall perception of rapport with each client and their comfort with technology. Result: There was a strong correlation between TASC-r total scores and overall ratings of rapport, providing preliminary evidence of TASC-r face validity. There was no significant difference between TASC-r scores for telepractice and face-to-face therapy (p = 0.961), nor face-to-face and telepractice SLPs’ confidence with familiar (p = 0.414) or unfamiliar technology (p = 0.780). Conclusion: The TASC-r may be a promising tool for measuring therapeutic alliance in speech–language pathology. Telepractice does not appear to have a negative effect on rapport between SLPs and paediatric clients. Future research is required to identify how SLPs develop rapport in telepractice.

KW - clinician–client relationship

KW - speech–language pathologist

KW - telehealth

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014512692&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/17549507.2017.1292547

DO - 10.1080/17549507.2017.1292547

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 287

EP - 296

JO - Advances in Speech Language Pathology

JF - Advances in Speech Language Pathology

SN - 1441-7049

IS - 3

ER -