Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance- paper 6: Reporting guidelines for qualitative, implementation, and process evaluation evidence syntheses

Kate Flemming, Andrew Booth, Karin Hannes, Margaret Cargo, Jane Noyes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To outline contemporary and novel developments for the presentation and reporting of syntheses of qualitative, implementation, and process evaluation evidence and provide recommendations for the use of reporting guidelines. Study Design and Setting: An overview of reporting guidelines for qualitative, implementation, and process evaluation evidence syntheses drawing on current international literature and the collective expert knowledge of the Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group. Results: Several reporting guidelines exist that can be used or adapted to report syntheses of qualitative, implementation, and process evaluation evidence. Methods to develop individual guidance varied. The use of a relevant reporting guideline can enhance the transparency, consistency, and quality of reporting. Guidelines that exist are generic, method specific, and for particular aspects of the reviewing process, searching. Conclusion: Caution is expressed over the potential for reporting guidelines to produce a mechanistic approach moving the focus away from the content and toward the procedural aspects of the review. The use of a reporting guideline is recommended and a five-step decision flowchart to guide the choice of reporting guideline is provided. Gaps remain in method-specific reporting guidelines such as mixed-study, implementation, and process evaluation evidence syntheses.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)79-85
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume97
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Guidelines
Software Design

Cite this

@article{c651de75ebf54207b204c68028150986,
title = "Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance- paper 6: Reporting guidelines for qualitative, implementation, and process evaluation evidence syntheses",
abstract = "Objectives: To outline contemporary and novel developments for the presentation and reporting of syntheses of qualitative, implementation, and process evaluation evidence and provide recommendations for the use of reporting guidelines. Study Design and Setting: An overview of reporting guidelines for qualitative, implementation, and process evaluation evidence syntheses drawing on current international literature and the collective expert knowledge of the Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group. Results: Several reporting guidelines exist that can be used or adapted to report syntheses of qualitative, implementation, and process evaluation evidence. Methods to develop individual guidance varied. The use of a relevant reporting guideline can enhance the transparency, consistency, and quality of reporting. Guidelines that exist are generic, method specific, and for particular aspects of the reviewing process, searching. Conclusion: Caution is expressed over the potential for reporting guidelines to produce a mechanistic approach moving the focus away from the content and toward the procedural aspects of the review. The use of a reporting guideline is recommended and a five-step decision flowchart to guide the choice of reporting guideline is provided. Gaps remain in method-specific reporting guidelines such as mixed-study, implementation, and process evaluation evidence syntheses.",
keywords = "Implementation, Methods, Qualitative evidence synthesis, Reporting guidelines, Systematic reviews",
author = "Kate Flemming and Andrew Booth and Karin Hannes and Margaret Cargo and Jane Noyes",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.022",
language = "English",
volume = "97",
pages = "79--85",
journal = "Journal of Chronic Diseases",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",

}

Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance- paper 6: Reporting guidelines for qualitative, implementation, and process evaluation evidence syntheses. / Flemming, Kate; Booth, Andrew; Hannes, Karin; Cargo, Margaret; Noyes, Jane.

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 97, 05.2018, p. 79-85.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance- paper 6: Reporting guidelines for qualitative, implementation, and process evaluation evidence syntheses

AU - Flemming, Kate

AU - Booth, Andrew

AU - Hannes, Karin

AU - Cargo, Margaret

AU - Noyes, Jane

PY - 2018/5

Y1 - 2018/5

N2 - Objectives: To outline contemporary and novel developments for the presentation and reporting of syntheses of qualitative, implementation, and process evaluation evidence and provide recommendations for the use of reporting guidelines. Study Design and Setting: An overview of reporting guidelines for qualitative, implementation, and process evaluation evidence syntheses drawing on current international literature and the collective expert knowledge of the Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group. Results: Several reporting guidelines exist that can be used or adapted to report syntheses of qualitative, implementation, and process evaluation evidence. Methods to develop individual guidance varied. The use of a relevant reporting guideline can enhance the transparency, consistency, and quality of reporting. Guidelines that exist are generic, method specific, and for particular aspects of the reviewing process, searching. Conclusion: Caution is expressed over the potential for reporting guidelines to produce a mechanistic approach moving the focus away from the content and toward the procedural aspects of the review. The use of a reporting guideline is recommended and a five-step decision flowchart to guide the choice of reporting guideline is provided. Gaps remain in method-specific reporting guidelines such as mixed-study, implementation, and process evaluation evidence syntheses.

AB - Objectives: To outline contemporary and novel developments for the presentation and reporting of syntheses of qualitative, implementation, and process evaluation evidence and provide recommendations for the use of reporting guidelines. Study Design and Setting: An overview of reporting guidelines for qualitative, implementation, and process evaluation evidence syntheses drawing on current international literature and the collective expert knowledge of the Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group. Results: Several reporting guidelines exist that can be used or adapted to report syntheses of qualitative, implementation, and process evaluation evidence. Methods to develop individual guidance varied. The use of a relevant reporting guideline can enhance the transparency, consistency, and quality of reporting. Guidelines that exist are generic, method specific, and for particular aspects of the reviewing process, searching. Conclusion: Caution is expressed over the potential for reporting guidelines to produce a mechanistic approach moving the focus away from the content and toward the procedural aspects of the review. The use of a reporting guideline is recommended and a five-step decision flowchart to guide the choice of reporting guideline is provided. Gaps remain in method-specific reporting guidelines such as mixed-study, implementation, and process evaluation evidence syntheses.

KW - Implementation

KW - Methods

KW - Qualitative evidence synthesis

KW - Reporting guidelines

KW - Systematic reviews

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031323009&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.022

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.022

M3 - Article

VL - 97

SP - 79

EP - 85

JO - Journal of Chronic Diseases

JF - Journal of Chronic Diseases

SN - 0895-4356

ER -