Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance paper 2: Methods for question formulation, searching, and protocol development for qualitative evidence synthesis

Janet L. Harris, Andrew Booth, Margaret Cargo, Karin Hannes, Angela Harden, Kate Flemming, Ruth Garside, Tomas Pantoja, James Thomas, Jane Noyes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper updates previous Cochrane guidance on question formulation, searching, and protocol development, reflecting recent developments in methods for conducting qualitative evidence syntheses to inform Cochrane intervention reviews. Examples are used to illustrate how decisions about boundaries for a review are formed via an iterative process of constructing lines of inquiry and mapping the available information to ascertain whether evidence exists to answer questions related to effectiveness, implementation, feasibility, appropriateness, economic evidence, and equity. The process of question formulation allows reviewers to situate the topic in relation to how it informs and explains effectiveness, using the criterion of meaningfulness, appropriateness, feasibility, and implementation. Questions related to complex questions and interventions can be structured by drawing on an increasingly wide range of question frameworks. Logic models and theoretical frameworks are useful tools for conceptually mapping the literature to illustrate the complexity of the phenomenon of interest. Furthermore, protocol development may require iterative question formulation and searching. Consequently, the final protocol may function as a guide rather than a prescriptive route map, particularly in qualitative reviews that ask more exploratory and open-ended questions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)39-48
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume97
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Theoretical Models
Economics

Cite this

Harris, Janet L. ; Booth, Andrew ; Cargo, Margaret ; Hannes, Karin ; Harden, Angela ; Flemming, Kate ; Garside, Ruth ; Pantoja, Tomas ; Thomas, James ; Noyes, Jane. / Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance paper 2: Methods for question formulation, searching, and protocol development for qualitative evidence synthesis. In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2018 ; Vol. 97. pp. 39-48.
@article{1d1b72c468e7415d99fe508925ca0bdf,
title = "Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance paper 2: Methods for question formulation, searching, and protocol development for qualitative evidence synthesis",
abstract = "This paper updates previous Cochrane guidance on question formulation, searching, and protocol development, reflecting recent developments in methods for conducting qualitative evidence syntheses to inform Cochrane intervention reviews. Examples are used to illustrate how decisions about boundaries for a review are formed via an iterative process of constructing lines of inquiry and mapping the available information to ascertain whether evidence exists to answer questions related to effectiveness, implementation, feasibility, appropriateness, economic evidence, and equity. The process of question formulation allows reviewers to situate the topic in relation to how it informs and explains effectiveness, using the criterion of meaningfulness, appropriateness, feasibility, and implementation. Questions related to complex questions and interventions can be structured by drawing on an increasingly wide range of question frameworks. Logic models and theoretical frameworks are useful tools for conceptually mapping the literature to illustrate the complexity of the phenomenon of interest. Furthermore, protocol development may require iterative question formulation and searching. Consequently, the final protocol may function as a guide rather than a prescriptive route map, particularly in qualitative reviews that ask more exploratory and open-ended questions.",
keywords = "Cochrane collaboration, Methods, Protocol development, Qualitative evidence synthesis, Question formulation, Systematic reviews",
author = "Harris, {Janet L.} and Andrew Booth and Margaret Cargo and Karin Hannes and Angela Harden and Kate Flemming and Ruth Garside and Tomas Pantoja and James Thomas and Jane Noyes",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.023",
language = "English",
volume = "97",
pages = "39--48",
journal = "Journal of Chronic Diseases",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",

}

Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance paper 2: Methods for question formulation, searching, and protocol development for qualitative evidence synthesis. / Harris, Janet L.; Booth, Andrew; Cargo, Margaret; Hannes, Karin; Harden, Angela; Flemming, Kate; Garside, Ruth; Pantoja, Tomas; Thomas, James; Noyes, Jane.

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 97, 05.2018, p. 39-48.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance paper 2: Methods for question formulation, searching, and protocol development for qualitative evidence synthesis

AU - Harris, Janet L.

AU - Booth, Andrew

AU - Cargo, Margaret

AU - Hannes, Karin

AU - Harden, Angela

AU - Flemming, Kate

AU - Garside, Ruth

AU - Pantoja, Tomas

AU - Thomas, James

AU - Noyes, Jane

PY - 2018/5

Y1 - 2018/5

N2 - This paper updates previous Cochrane guidance on question formulation, searching, and protocol development, reflecting recent developments in methods for conducting qualitative evidence syntheses to inform Cochrane intervention reviews. Examples are used to illustrate how decisions about boundaries for a review are formed via an iterative process of constructing lines of inquiry and mapping the available information to ascertain whether evidence exists to answer questions related to effectiveness, implementation, feasibility, appropriateness, economic evidence, and equity. The process of question formulation allows reviewers to situate the topic in relation to how it informs and explains effectiveness, using the criterion of meaningfulness, appropriateness, feasibility, and implementation. Questions related to complex questions and interventions can be structured by drawing on an increasingly wide range of question frameworks. Logic models and theoretical frameworks are useful tools for conceptually mapping the literature to illustrate the complexity of the phenomenon of interest. Furthermore, protocol development may require iterative question formulation and searching. Consequently, the final protocol may function as a guide rather than a prescriptive route map, particularly in qualitative reviews that ask more exploratory and open-ended questions.

AB - This paper updates previous Cochrane guidance on question formulation, searching, and protocol development, reflecting recent developments in methods for conducting qualitative evidence syntheses to inform Cochrane intervention reviews. Examples are used to illustrate how decisions about boundaries for a review are formed via an iterative process of constructing lines of inquiry and mapping the available information to ascertain whether evidence exists to answer questions related to effectiveness, implementation, feasibility, appropriateness, economic evidence, and equity. The process of question formulation allows reviewers to situate the topic in relation to how it informs and explains effectiveness, using the criterion of meaningfulness, appropriateness, feasibility, and implementation. Questions related to complex questions and interventions can be structured by drawing on an increasingly wide range of question frameworks. Logic models and theoretical frameworks are useful tools for conceptually mapping the literature to illustrate the complexity of the phenomenon of interest. Furthermore, protocol development may require iterative question formulation and searching. Consequently, the final protocol may function as a guide rather than a prescriptive route map, particularly in qualitative reviews that ask more exploratory and open-ended questions.

KW - Cochrane collaboration

KW - Methods

KW - Protocol development

KW - Qualitative evidence synthesis

KW - Question formulation

KW - Systematic reviews

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040533732&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.023

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.023

M3 - Article

VL - 97

SP - 39

EP - 48

JO - Journal of Chronic Diseases

JF - Journal of Chronic Diseases

SN - 0895-4356

ER -