Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance paper 3: Methods for assessing methodological limitations, data extraction and synthesis, and confidence in synthesized qualitative findings

Jane Noyes, Andrew Booth, Kate Flemming, Ruth Garside, Angela Harden, Simon Lewin, Tomas Pantoja, Karin Hannes, Margaret Cargo, James Thomas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group develops and publishes guidance on the synthesis of qualitative and mixed-method implementation evidence. Choice of appropriate methodologies, methods, and tools is essential when developing a rigorous protocol and conducting the synthesis. Cochrane authors who conduct qualitative evidence syntheses have thus far used a small number of relatively simple methods to address similarly written questions. Cochrane has invested in methodological work to develop new tools and to encourage the production of exemplar reviews to show the value of more innovative methods that address a wider range of questions. In this paper, in the series, we report updated guidance on the selection of tools to assess methodological limitations in qualitative studies and methods to extract and synthesize qualitative evidence. We recommend application of Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation-Confidence in the Evidence from Qualitative Reviews to assess confidence in qualitative synthesized findings. This guidance aims to support review authors to undertake a qualitative evidence synthesis that is intended to be integrated subsequently with the findings of one or more Cochrane reviews of the effects of similar interventions. The review of intervention effects may be undertaken concurrently with or separate to the qualitative evidence synthesis. We encourage further development through reflection and formal testing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)49-58
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume97
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2018
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

Noyes, Jane ; Booth, Andrew ; Flemming, Kate ; Garside, Ruth ; Harden, Angela ; Lewin, Simon ; Pantoja, Tomas ; Hannes, Karin ; Cargo, Margaret ; Thomas, James. / Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance paper 3: Methods for assessing methodological limitations, data extraction and synthesis, and confidence in synthesized qualitative findings. In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2018 ; Vol. 97. pp. 49-58.
@article{4bd03682ab6d445d9d22681f36c8c64a,
title = "Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance paper 3: Methods for assessing methodological limitations, data extraction and synthesis, and confidence in synthesized qualitative findings",
abstract = "The Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group develops and publishes guidance on the synthesis of qualitative and mixed-method implementation evidence. Choice of appropriate methodologies, methods, and tools is essential when developing a rigorous protocol and conducting the synthesis. Cochrane authors who conduct qualitative evidence syntheses have thus far used a small number of relatively simple methods to address similarly written questions. Cochrane has invested in methodological work to develop new tools and to encourage the production of exemplar reviews to show the value of more innovative methods that address a wider range of questions. In this paper, in the series, we report updated guidance on the selection of tools to assess methodological limitations in qualitative studies and methods to extract and synthesize qualitative evidence. We recommend application of Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation-Confidence in the Evidence from Qualitative Reviews to assess confidence in qualitative synthesized findings. This guidance aims to support review authors to undertake a qualitative evidence synthesis that is intended to be integrated subsequently with the findings of one or more Cochrane reviews of the effects of similar interventions. The review of intervention effects may be undertaken concurrently with or separate to the qualitative evidence synthesis. We encourage further development through reflection and formal testing.",
keywords = "Cochrane, GRADE CERQual, Methodological limitations, Qualitative evidence synthesis, Qualitative research, Systematic review",
author = "Jane Noyes and Andrew Booth and Kate Flemming and Ruth Garside and Angela Harden and Simon Lewin and Tomas Pantoja and Karin Hannes and Margaret Cargo and James Thomas",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.020",
language = "English",
volume = "97",
pages = "49--58",
journal = "Journal of Chronic Diseases",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",

}

Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance paper 3: Methods for assessing methodological limitations, data extraction and synthesis, and confidence in synthesized qualitative findings. / Noyes, Jane; Booth, Andrew; Flemming, Kate; Garside, Ruth; Harden, Angela; Lewin, Simon; Pantoja, Tomas; Hannes, Karin; Cargo, Margaret; Thomas, James.

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 97, 05.2018, p. 49-58.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance paper 3: Methods for assessing methodological limitations, data extraction and synthesis, and confidence in synthesized qualitative findings

AU - Noyes, Jane

AU - Booth, Andrew

AU - Flemming, Kate

AU - Garside, Ruth

AU - Harden, Angela

AU - Lewin, Simon

AU - Pantoja, Tomas

AU - Hannes, Karin

AU - Cargo, Margaret

AU - Thomas, James

PY - 2018/5

Y1 - 2018/5

N2 - The Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group develops and publishes guidance on the synthesis of qualitative and mixed-method implementation evidence. Choice of appropriate methodologies, methods, and tools is essential when developing a rigorous protocol and conducting the synthesis. Cochrane authors who conduct qualitative evidence syntheses have thus far used a small number of relatively simple methods to address similarly written questions. Cochrane has invested in methodological work to develop new tools and to encourage the production of exemplar reviews to show the value of more innovative methods that address a wider range of questions. In this paper, in the series, we report updated guidance on the selection of tools to assess methodological limitations in qualitative studies and methods to extract and synthesize qualitative evidence. We recommend application of Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation-Confidence in the Evidence from Qualitative Reviews to assess confidence in qualitative synthesized findings. This guidance aims to support review authors to undertake a qualitative evidence synthesis that is intended to be integrated subsequently with the findings of one or more Cochrane reviews of the effects of similar interventions. The review of intervention effects may be undertaken concurrently with or separate to the qualitative evidence synthesis. We encourage further development through reflection and formal testing.

AB - The Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group develops and publishes guidance on the synthesis of qualitative and mixed-method implementation evidence. Choice of appropriate methodologies, methods, and tools is essential when developing a rigorous protocol and conducting the synthesis. Cochrane authors who conduct qualitative evidence syntheses have thus far used a small number of relatively simple methods to address similarly written questions. Cochrane has invested in methodological work to develop new tools and to encourage the production of exemplar reviews to show the value of more innovative methods that address a wider range of questions. In this paper, in the series, we report updated guidance on the selection of tools to assess methodological limitations in qualitative studies and methods to extract and synthesize qualitative evidence. We recommend application of Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation-Confidence in the Evidence from Qualitative Reviews to assess confidence in qualitative synthesized findings. This guidance aims to support review authors to undertake a qualitative evidence synthesis that is intended to be integrated subsequently with the findings of one or more Cochrane reviews of the effects of similar interventions. The review of intervention effects may be undertaken concurrently with or separate to the qualitative evidence synthesis. We encourage further development through reflection and formal testing.

KW - Cochrane

KW - GRADE CERQual

KW - Methodological limitations

KW - Qualitative evidence synthesis

KW - Qualitative research

KW - Systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040356685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.020

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.020

M3 - Article

VL - 97

SP - 49

EP - 58

JO - Journal of Chronic Diseases

JF - Journal of Chronic Diseases

SN - 0895-4356

ER -