TY - JOUR
T1 - Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series—paper 1: introduction
AU - Noyes, Jane
AU - Booth, Andrew
AU - Cargo, Margaret
AU - Flemming, Kate
AU - Garside, Ruth
AU - Hannes, Karin
AU - Harden, Angela
AU - Harris, Janet
AU - Lewin, Simon
AU - Pantoja, Tomas
AU - Thomas, James
PY - 2018/5
Y1 - 2018/5
N2 - Cochrane reviews are systematic reviews of primary research in human health care and health policy and are internationally recognized health care resources for use in a decision-making process [1]. Cochrane works collaboratively with contributors around the world to produce authoritative, relevant, and reliable reviews. Cochrane reviews are commonly used in a guideline development process to determine recommendations for practice. The Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group provide methodological advice and guidance to Cochrane as well as leading methodological development to benefit the wider qualitative evidence synthesis community. In this introductory paper 1, we briefly outline the evolution of qualitative and mixed-method synthesis methods, the role of qualitative and mixed-method syntheses in a decision-making process, and the contribution of qualitative and mixed-method syntheses to understand the complexity in complex intervention reviews. We then introduce a series of papers that provide Cochrane guidance on conducting qualitative and mixed-method evidence syntheses for a decision-making context.
AB - Cochrane reviews are systematic reviews of primary research in human health care and health policy and are internationally recognized health care resources for use in a decision-making process [1]. Cochrane works collaboratively with contributors around the world to produce authoritative, relevant, and reliable reviews. Cochrane reviews are commonly used in a guideline development process to determine recommendations for practice. The Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group provide methodological advice and guidance to Cochrane as well as leading methodological development to benefit the wider qualitative evidence synthesis community. In this introductory paper 1, we briefly outline the evolution of qualitative and mixed-method synthesis methods, the role of qualitative and mixed-method syntheses in a decision-making process, and the contribution of qualitative and mixed-method syntheses to understand the complexity in complex intervention reviews. We then introduce a series of papers that provide Cochrane guidance on conducting qualitative and mixed-method evidence syntheses for a decision-making context.
KW - Cochrane collaboration
KW - Implementation research
KW - Mixed methods research
KW - Process evaluations
KW - Qualitative evidence synthesis
KW - Qualitative research
KW - Systematic reviews
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044711451&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.09.025
DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.09.025
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85044711451
SN - 0895-4356
VL - 97
SP - 35
EP - 38
JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
ER -