Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series—paper 2

Janet L. Harris, Andrew Booth, Margaret Cargo, Karin Hannes, Angela Harden, Kate Flemming, Ruth Garside, Tomas Pantoja, James Thomas, Jane Noyes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

112 Citations (Scopus)


This paper updates previous Cochrane guidance on question formulation, searching, and protocol development, reflecting recent developments in methods for conducting qualitative evidence syntheses to inform Cochrane intervention reviews. Examples are used to illustrate how decisions about boundaries for a review are formed via an iterative process of constructing lines of inquiry and mapping the available information to ascertain whether evidence exists to answer questions related to effectiveness, implementation, feasibility, appropriateness, economic evidence, and equity. The process of question formulation allows reviewers to situate the topic in relation to how it informs and explains effectiveness, using the criterion of meaningfulness, appropriateness, feasibility, and implementation. Questions related to complex questions and interventions can be structured by drawing on an increasingly wide range of question frameworks. Logic models and theoretical frameworks are useful tools for conceptually mapping the literature to illustrate the complexity of the phenomenon of interest. Furthermore, protocol development may require iterative question formulation and searching. Consequently, the final protocol may function as a guide rather than a prescriptive route map, particularly in qualitative reviews that ask more exploratory and open-ended questions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)39-48
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Publication statusPublished - May 2018
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series—paper 2'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this