Codesigning as a discursive practice in emergency health services

The architecture of deliberation

Rick Iedema, Eamon Merrick, Donella Piper, Kate Britton, Jane Gray, Raj Verma, Nicole Manning

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article addresses the issue of how government agencies are increasingly attempting to involve users in the design of public services. The article examines codesign as a method for fostering new and purposeful interaction among service-delivery staff and their customers. Codesign brings together stakeholders who, in the past, have had limited input into the way public services are experienced. By participating in this emerging discourse practice, codesign stakeholders can construct new ways of relating and deliberating. The data presented in this article are drawn from a codesign study initiated by the New South Wales Department of Health in an effort to improve the experience of staff, patients, and caregivers. The article concludes that codesign presents service consumers, professionals, and government officials with new opportunities as well as new challenges. Its opportunities reside in codesign bringing stakeholders together across previously impervious boundaries, producing new understandings, relationships, and engagements. Its challenges reside in these new understandings, relationships, and engagements only becoming possible and only continuing to be relevant if and when stakeholders are prepared to adopt and adapt to the new discourse needed to realize them, implicating them in what has been referred to as the "design competency spiral."

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)73-91
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Applied Behavioral Science
Volume46
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Government Agencies
New South Wales
Foster Home Care
Emergency Medical Services
Caregivers
Health
Government Employees

Cite this

Iedema, Rick ; Merrick, Eamon ; Piper, Donella ; Britton, Kate ; Gray, Jane ; Verma, Raj ; Manning, Nicole. / Codesigning as a discursive practice in emergency health services : The architecture of deliberation. In: Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 2010 ; Vol. 46, No. 1. pp. 73-91.
@article{27b44f6036094628b5b5250cc081dcc8,
title = "Codesigning as a discursive practice in emergency health services: The architecture of deliberation",
abstract = "This article addresses the issue of how government agencies are increasingly attempting to involve users in the design of public services. The article examines codesign as a method for fostering new and purposeful interaction among service-delivery staff and their customers. Codesign brings together stakeholders who, in the past, have had limited input into the way public services are experienced. By participating in this emerging discourse practice, codesign stakeholders can construct new ways of relating and deliberating. The data presented in this article are drawn from a codesign study initiated by the New South Wales Department of Health in an effort to improve the experience of staff, patients, and caregivers. The article concludes that codesign presents service consumers, professionals, and government officials with new opportunities as well as new challenges. Its opportunities reside in codesign bringing stakeholders together across previously impervious boundaries, producing new understandings, relationships, and engagements. Its challenges reside in these new understandings, relationships, and engagements only becoming possible and only continuing to be relevant if and when stakeholders are prepared to adopt and adapt to the new discourse needed to realize them, implicating them in what has been referred to as the {"}design competency spiral.{"}",
keywords = "Affective practice, Codesign, Deliberative process, Emergency departments, Experience-based design, Public service",
author = "Rick Iedema and Eamon Merrick and Donella Piper and Kate Britton and Jane Gray and Raj Verma and Nicole Manning",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1177/0021886309357544",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "73--91",
journal = "Journal of Applied Behavioral Science",
issn = "0021-8863",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

Codesigning as a discursive practice in emergency health services : The architecture of deliberation. / Iedema, Rick; Merrick, Eamon; Piper, Donella; Britton, Kate; Gray, Jane; Verma, Raj; Manning, Nicole.

In: Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 46, No. 1, 03.2010, p. 73-91.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Codesigning as a discursive practice in emergency health services

T2 - The architecture of deliberation

AU - Iedema, Rick

AU - Merrick, Eamon

AU - Piper, Donella

AU - Britton, Kate

AU - Gray, Jane

AU - Verma, Raj

AU - Manning, Nicole

PY - 2010/3

Y1 - 2010/3

N2 - This article addresses the issue of how government agencies are increasingly attempting to involve users in the design of public services. The article examines codesign as a method for fostering new and purposeful interaction among service-delivery staff and their customers. Codesign brings together stakeholders who, in the past, have had limited input into the way public services are experienced. By participating in this emerging discourse practice, codesign stakeholders can construct new ways of relating and deliberating. The data presented in this article are drawn from a codesign study initiated by the New South Wales Department of Health in an effort to improve the experience of staff, patients, and caregivers. The article concludes that codesign presents service consumers, professionals, and government officials with new opportunities as well as new challenges. Its opportunities reside in codesign bringing stakeholders together across previously impervious boundaries, producing new understandings, relationships, and engagements. Its challenges reside in these new understandings, relationships, and engagements only becoming possible and only continuing to be relevant if and when stakeholders are prepared to adopt and adapt to the new discourse needed to realize them, implicating them in what has been referred to as the "design competency spiral."

AB - This article addresses the issue of how government agencies are increasingly attempting to involve users in the design of public services. The article examines codesign as a method for fostering new and purposeful interaction among service-delivery staff and their customers. Codesign brings together stakeholders who, in the past, have had limited input into the way public services are experienced. By participating in this emerging discourse practice, codesign stakeholders can construct new ways of relating and deliberating. The data presented in this article are drawn from a codesign study initiated by the New South Wales Department of Health in an effort to improve the experience of staff, patients, and caregivers. The article concludes that codesign presents service consumers, professionals, and government officials with new opportunities as well as new challenges. Its opportunities reside in codesign bringing stakeholders together across previously impervious boundaries, producing new understandings, relationships, and engagements. Its challenges reside in these new understandings, relationships, and engagements only becoming possible and only continuing to be relevant if and when stakeholders are prepared to adopt and adapt to the new discourse needed to realize them, implicating them in what has been referred to as the "design competency spiral."

KW - Affective practice

KW - Codesign

KW - Deliberative process

KW - Emergency departments

KW - Experience-based design

KW - Public service

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77950305994&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0021886309357544

DO - 10.1177/0021886309357544

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 73

EP - 91

JO - Journal of Applied Behavioral Science

JF - Journal of Applied Behavioral Science

SN - 0021-8863

IS - 1

ER -