TY - JOUR
T1 - Collaborative learning in the professional development of medical radiation practitioners
AU - Turner, Michelle
AU - Morasi, Sanya
AU - Mrsnik-Hamdi, Monica
AU - Shanahan, Madeleine
N1 - Funding Information:
Workplaces can also support MRP attendance at conferences through the provision of financial support and leave. Most workplaces were observed to provide funding and paid leave for conferences if staff members were presenting or attending (Table 7 ). Only 20% ( = 21) have all or the majority of their travel expenses paid for by their workplace, and 29% ( = 30) have no travel paid. A percentage (13–20%) of participants were unsure of workplace supports which may be available to them to attend conferences. n n
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology
Funding Information:
The study team would like to thank the participants who took time from their busy schedules to take part in this study. The study team also would like to thank the Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy for the support provided in distribution of the survey.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology.
PY - 2021/9/18
Y1 - 2021/9/18
N2 - Introduction: Medical radiation practitioners (MRPs) participate in continuous professional development (CPD) to update their knowledge, skills, safety standards and patient care. The Medical Radiation Practice Board of Australia (MRPBA) recommends that practitioners participate in a variety of activities and to incorporate the use of collaborative learning tools. The aim of this research was to investigate the value, use and workplace supports for online and face-to-face collaborative learning for CPD. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey of Australian MRPs was conducted. The questionnaire was distributed via e-blast from the Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy (ASMIRT) to members. Results: A total of 115 completed questionnaires were received. Seminars, workshops and conferences were the most valued collaborative learning tools, with no significant difference in ranking observed (P > 0.05). The majority of MRPs regularly attend conferences (64%, n = 73) with those working in a metropolitan location more likely to attend. MRPs are supported by their workplace to attend conferences through the provision of paid leave (61%, n = 63), funding (50%, n = 52) and to a lesser extent travel expense (38%, n = 39). More than half (60%, n = 69) of the participants use social media for CPD with Facebook being the most frequently used and most useful online platform. The most common reasons for using social media for CPD were accessibility to information (85%, n = 56), little geographical limitations (77%, n = 51) and ease of use (74%, n = 49). Conclusion: Medical radiation practitioners currently utilise both face-to-face and online collaborative learning tools to meet their CPD needs. Face-to-face tools are more frequently utilised and highly valued by MRPs.
AB - Introduction: Medical radiation practitioners (MRPs) participate in continuous professional development (CPD) to update their knowledge, skills, safety standards and patient care. The Medical Radiation Practice Board of Australia (MRPBA) recommends that practitioners participate in a variety of activities and to incorporate the use of collaborative learning tools. The aim of this research was to investigate the value, use and workplace supports for online and face-to-face collaborative learning for CPD. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey of Australian MRPs was conducted. The questionnaire was distributed via e-blast from the Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy (ASMIRT) to members. Results: A total of 115 completed questionnaires were received. Seminars, workshops and conferences were the most valued collaborative learning tools, with no significant difference in ranking observed (P > 0.05). The majority of MRPs regularly attend conferences (64%, n = 73) with those working in a metropolitan location more likely to attend. MRPs are supported by their workplace to attend conferences through the provision of paid leave (61%, n = 63), funding (50%, n = 52) and to a lesser extent travel expense (38%, n = 39). More than half (60%, n = 69) of the participants use social media for CPD with Facebook being the most frequently used and most useful online platform. The most common reasons for using social media for CPD were accessibility to information (85%, n = 56), little geographical limitations (77%, n = 51) and ease of use (74%, n = 49). Conclusion: Medical radiation practitioners currently utilise both face-to-face and online collaborative learning tools to meet their CPD needs. Face-to-face tools are more frequently utilised and highly valued by MRPs.
KW - Continuous professional development
KW - education
KW - radiation therapists
KW - radiographer
KW - social media
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115085598&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jmrs.548
DO - 10.1002/jmrs.548
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85115085598
SN - 2051-3895
VL - 69
SP - 156
EP - 164
JO - Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
JF - Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
IS - 2
ER -