Collaborative research networks in health:A pragmatic scoping study for the development of an imaging network

Tracy Robinson, Nicole Rankin, Anna Janssen, Deborah McGregor, Stuart Grieve, Timothy Shaw

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)
30 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Collaborative research networks are often touted as a solution for enhancing the translation of knowledge, but questions remain about how to evaluate their impact on health service delivery. This pragmatic scoping study explored the enabling factors for developing and supporting a collaborative imaging network in a metropolitan university in Australia. Methods: An advisory group was established to provide governance and to identify key informants and participants. Focus group discussions (n = 2) and semi-structured interviews (n = 22) were facilitated with representatives from a broad range of disciplines. In addition, a survey, a review of relevant websites (n = 15) and a broad review of the literature were undertaken to elicit information on collaborative research networks and perceived needs and factors that would support their involvement in a multi-disciplinary collaborative research network. Findings were de-identified and broad themes were identified. Results: Participants identified human factors as having priority for developing and sustaining a collaborative research network. In particular, leadership, a shared vision and a communication plan that includes social media were identified as crucial for sustaining an imaging network in health research. It is important to develop metrics that map relationships between network members and the role that communication tools can contribute to this process. Conclusions: This study confirms that human factors remain significant across a range of collaborative endeavours. The use of focus group discussions, interviews, and literature and website reviews means we can now strongly recommend the primacy of human factors. More work is needed to identify how the network operates and what specific indicators or metrics help build the capacity of clinicians and scientists to participate in translational research.

Original languageEnglish
Article number76
Pages (from-to)1-7
Number of pages7
JournalHealth Research Policy and Systems
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Health
Research
Translational Medical Research
Focus Groups
Communication
Interviews
Social Media
Causality
Health Services
Surveys and Questionnaires

Cite this

Robinson, Tracy ; Rankin, Nicole ; Janssen, Anna ; McGregor, Deborah ; Grieve, Stuart ; Shaw, Timothy. / Collaborative research networks in health:A pragmatic scoping study for the development of an imaging network. In: Health Research Policy and Systems. 2015 ; Vol. 13, No. 1. pp. 1-7.
@article{9cc5d24cf7c94c738fceabdb057c3e4f,
title = "Collaborative research networks in health:A pragmatic scoping study for the development of an imaging network",
abstract = "Background: Collaborative research networks are often touted as a solution for enhancing the translation of knowledge, but questions remain about how to evaluate their impact on health service delivery. This pragmatic scoping study explored the enabling factors for developing and supporting a collaborative imaging network in a metropolitan university in Australia. Methods: An advisory group was established to provide governance and to identify key informants and participants. Focus group discussions (n = 2) and semi-structured interviews (n = 22) were facilitated with representatives from a broad range of disciplines. In addition, a survey, a review of relevant websites (n = 15) and a broad review of the literature were undertaken to elicit information on collaborative research networks and perceived needs and factors that would support their involvement in a multi-disciplinary collaborative research network. Findings were de-identified and broad themes were identified. Results: Participants identified human factors as having priority for developing and sustaining a collaborative research network. In particular, leadership, a shared vision and a communication plan that includes social media were identified as crucial for sustaining an imaging network in health research. It is important to develop metrics that map relationships between network members and the role that communication tools can contribute to this process. Conclusions: This study confirms that human factors remain significant across a range of collaborative endeavours. The use of focus group discussions, interviews, and literature and website reviews means we can now strongly recommend the primacy of human factors. More work is needed to identify how the network operates and what specific indicators or metrics help build the capacity of clinicians and scientists to participate in translational research.",
keywords = "Collaborative research networks, Enabling factors, Translational research, New South Wales, Humans, Focus Groups, Medical Informatics/methods, Community Networks/organization & administration, Cooperative Behavior, Health Care Sector/organization & administration, Technology Assessment, Biomedical/methods, Universities, Information Dissemination/methods, Health Services Research/methods, Translational Medical Research/methods, Interviews as Topic, Surveys and Questionnaires, Advisory Committees/organization & administration, Diagnostic Imaging/instrumentation, Internet, Qualitative Research, Social Media/organization & administration, Organizational Case Studies",
author = "Tracy Robinson and Nicole Rankin and Anna Janssen and Deborah McGregor and Stuart Grieve and Timothy Shaw",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1186/s12961-015-0067-y",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "1--7",
journal = "Health Research Policy and Systems",
issn = "1478-4505",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

Collaborative research networks in health:A pragmatic scoping study for the development of an imaging network. / Robinson, Tracy; Rankin, Nicole; Janssen, Anna; McGregor, Deborah; Grieve, Stuart; Shaw, Timothy.

In: Health Research Policy and Systems, Vol. 13, No. 1, 76, 2015, p. 1-7.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Collaborative research networks in health:A pragmatic scoping study for the development of an imaging network

AU - Robinson, Tracy

AU - Rankin, Nicole

AU - Janssen, Anna

AU - McGregor, Deborah

AU - Grieve, Stuart

AU - Shaw, Timothy

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Background: Collaborative research networks are often touted as a solution for enhancing the translation of knowledge, but questions remain about how to evaluate their impact on health service delivery. This pragmatic scoping study explored the enabling factors for developing and supporting a collaborative imaging network in a metropolitan university in Australia. Methods: An advisory group was established to provide governance and to identify key informants and participants. Focus group discussions (n = 2) and semi-structured interviews (n = 22) were facilitated with representatives from a broad range of disciplines. In addition, a survey, a review of relevant websites (n = 15) and a broad review of the literature were undertaken to elicit information on collaborative research networks and perceived needs and factors that would support their involvement in a multi-disciplinary collaborative research network. Findings were de-identified and broad themes were identified. Results: Participants identified human factors as having priority for developing and sustaining a collaborative research network. In particular, leadership, a shared vision and a communication plan that includes social media were identified as crucial for sustaining an imaging network in health research. It is important to develop metrics that map relationships between network members and the role that communication tools can contribute to this process. Conclusions: This study confirms that human factors remain significant across a range of collaborative endeavours. The use of focus group discussions, interviews, and literature and website reviews means we can now strongly recommend the primacy of human factors. More work is needed to identify how the network operates and what specific indicators or metrics help build the capacity of clinicians and scientists to participate in translational research.

AB - Background: Collaborative research networks are often touted as a solution for enhancing the translation of knowledge, but questions remain about how to evaluate their impact on health service delivery. This pragmatic scoping study explored the enabling factors for developing and supporting a collaborative imaging network in a metropolitan university in Australia. Methods: An advisory group was established to provide governance and to identify key informants and participants. Focus group discussions (n = 2) and semi-structured interviews (n = 22) were facilitated with representatives from a broad range of disciplines. In addition, a survey, a review of relevant websites (n = 15) and a broad review of the literature were undertaken to elicit information on collaborative research networks and perceived needs and factors that would support their involvement in a multi-disciplinary collaborative research network. Findings were de-identified and broad themes were identified. Results: Participants identified human factors as having priority for developing and sustaining a collaborative research network. In particular, leadership, a shared vision and a communication plan that includes social media were identified as crucial for sustaining an imaging network in health research. It is important to develop metrics that map relationships between network members and the role that communication tools can contribute to this process. Conclusions: This study confirms that human factors remain significant across a range of collaborative endeavours. The use of focus group discussions, interviews, and literature and website reviews means we can now strongly recommend the primacy of human factors. More work is needed to identify how the network operates and what specific indicators or metrics help build the capacity of clinicians and scientists to participate in translational research.

KW - Collaborative research networks

KW - Enabling factors

KW - Translational research

KW - New South Wales

KW - Humans

KW - Focus Groups

KW - Medical Informatics/methods

KW - Community Networks/organization & administration

KW - Cooperative Behavior

KW - Health Care Sector/organization & administration

KW - Technology Assessment, Biomedical/methods

KW - Universities

KW - Information Dissemination/methods

KW - Health Services Research/methods

KW - Translational Medical Research/methods

KW - Interviews as Topic

KW - Surveys and Questionnaires

KW - Advisory Committees/organization & administration

KW - Diagnostic Imaging/instrumentation

KW - Internet

KW - Qualitative Research

KW - Social Media/organization & administration

KW - Organizational Case Studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84984844847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/collaborative-research-networks-health-pragmatic-scoping-study-development-imaging-network

U2 - 10.1186/s12961-015-0067-y

DO - 10.1186/s12961-015-0067-y

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 1

EP - 7

JO - Health Research Policy and Systems

JF - Health Research Policy and Systems

SN - 1478-4505

IS - 1

M1 - 76

ER -