Combining work and family: Rewards or risks for children’s mental health?

Lyndall Strazdins, Lean O'BRIEN, Nina Lucas, Bryan Rodgers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Prevailing child psychopathology paradigms focus on caregiving in isolation from market work. Yet most children’s caregivers d mothers and fathers d are also employed. Although policy and academic debate has voiced concerns that employment could hamper mothers’ capacity to care, less emphasis is given to
the benefits generated by mothers’ jobs. By contrast, theories of child mental health often view fathers’ employment as beneficial, indeed necessary, for children’s wellbeing, and few problematise fathers’ capacity to combine work and care. This paper aims to integrate these seemingly contradictory concerns.
We consider whether mothers’ and fathers’ rewards from combining employment with childcare may be protective for children’s mental health, and whether their conflicts and dilemmas generate risks. Analyses use cross-sectional data from a representative survey of families with 4e5 year old children (Growing Up in Australia Study). We restricted our sample to employed parents (N ¼ 2809 mothers; 3982 fathers), using data gathered in 2004. While a majority of parents reported benefits and rewards from working (work-family facilitation), more than one third also reported difficulties and conflicts (workfamily conflict). When mothers or fathers experienced conflict we found elevations in young children’s
emotional and behavioural symptoms, with the risks compounding if both parents experienced conflict between work and family. Associations persisted after adjusting for family socioeconomic circumstances and composition, and they were not offset by work-family facilitation. We did not find evidence for heightened vulnerability to work-family conflict in families with few socioeconomic resources. However, among these disadvantaged families we observed stronger protective associations with children’s mental
health when parents had rewarding and supportive jobs. Our study extends current paradigms of child mental health by considering the interplay between care environments and market work. Jobs which help mothers and fathers to combine employment with caregiving could yield health benefits across
generations.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)99-107
Number of pages9
JournalSocial Science Medicine Social Science Medicine
Volume87
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Reward
Fathers
reward
Mental Health
father
mental health
Mothers
family work
parents
Parents
caregiving
paradigm
Family Conflict
Behavioral Symptoms
market
psychopathology
Vulnerable Populations
Insurance Benefits
Child Health
Psychopathology

Cite this

@article{5632ed88824844cd9a73074652b37efe,
title = "Combining work and family: Rewards or risks for children’s mental health?",
abstract = "Prevailing child psychopathology paradigms focus on caregiving in isolation from market work. Yet most children’s caregivers d mothers and fathers d are also employed. Although policy and academic debate has voiced concerns that employment could hamper mothers’ capacity to care, less emphasis is given tothe benefits generated by mothers’ jobs. By contrast, theories of child mental health often view fathers’ employment as beneficial, indeed necessary, for children’s wellbeing, and few problematise fathers’ capacity to combine work and care. This paper aims to integrate these seemingly contradictory concerns.We consider whether mothers’ and fathers’ rewards from combining employment with childcare may be protective for children’s mental health, and whether their conflicts and dilemmas generate risks. Analyses use cross-sectional data from a representative survey of families with 4e5 year old children (Growing Up in Australia Study). We restricted our sample to employed parents (N ¼ 2809 mothers; 3982 fathers), using data gathered in 2004. While a majority of parents reported benefits and rewards from working (work-family facilitation), more than one third also reported difficulties and conflicts (workfamily conflict). When mothers or fathers experienced conflict we found elevations in young children’semotional and behavioural symptoms, with the risks compounding if both parents experienced conflict between work and family. Associations persisted after adjusting for family socioeconomic circumstances and composition, and they were not offset by work-family facilitation. We did not find evidence for heightened vulnerability to work-family conflict in families with few socioeconomic resources. However, among these disadvantaged families we observed stronger protective associations with children’s mentalhealth when parents had rewarding and supportive jobs. Our study extends current paradigms of child mental health by considering the interplay between care environments and market work. Jobs which help mothers and fathers to combine employment with caregiving could yield health benefits acrossgenerations.",
author = "Lyndall Strazdins and Lean O'BRIEN and Nina Lucas and Bryan Rodgers",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.03.030",
language = "English",
volume = "87",
pages = "99--107",
journal = "Social Science Medicine Social Science Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

Combining work and family: Rewards or risks for children’s mental health? / Strazdins, Lyndall; O'BRIEN, Lean; Lucas, Nina; Rodgers, Bryan.

In: Social Science Medicine Social Science Medicine, Vol. 87, 2013, p. 99-107.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Combining work and family: Rewards or risks for children’s mental health?

AU - Strazdins, Lyndall

AU - O'BRIEN, Lean

AU - Lucas, Nina

AU - Rodgers, Bryan

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Prevailing child psychopathology paradigms focus on caregiving in isolation from market work. Yet most children’s caregivers d mothers and fathers d are also employed. Although policy and academic debate has voiced concerns that employment could hamper mothers’ capacity to care, less emphasis is given tothe benefits generated by mothers’ jobs. By contrast, theories of child mental health often view fathers’ employment as beneficial, indeed necessary, for children’s wellbeing, and few problematise fathers’ capacity to combine work and care. This paper aims to integrate these seemingly contradictory concerns.We consider whether mothers’ and fathers’ rewards from combining employment with childcare may be protective for children’s mental health, and whether their conflicts and dilemmas generate risks. Analyses use cross-sectional data from a representative survey of families with 4e5 year old children (Growing Up in Australia Study). We restricted our sample to employed parents (N ¼ 2809 mothers; 3982 fathers), using data gathered in 2004. While a majority of parents reported benefits and rewards from working (work-family facilitation), more than one third also reported difficulties and conflicts (workfamily conflict). When mothers or fathers experienced conflict we found elevations in young children’semotional and behavioural symptoms, with the risks compounding if both parents experienced conflict between work and family. Associations persisted after adjusting for family socioeconomic circumstances and composition, and they were not offset by work-family facilitation. We did not find evidence for heightened vulnerability to work-family conflict in families with few socioeconomic resources. However, among these disadvantaged families we observed stronger protective associations with children’s mentalhealth when parents had rewarding and supportive jobs. Our study extends current paradigms of child mental health by considering the interplay between care environments and market work. Jobs which help mothers and fathers to combine employment with caregiving could yield health benefits acrossgenerations.

AB - Prevailing child psychopathology paradigms focus on caregiving in isolation from market work. Yet most children’s caregivers d mothers and fathers d are also employed. Although policy and academic debate has voiced concerns that employment could hamper mothers’ capacity to care, less emphasis is given tothe benefits generated by mothers’ jobs. By contrast, theories of child mental health often view fathers’ employment as beneficial, indeed necessary, for children’s wellbeing, and few problematise fathers’ capacity to combine work and care. This paper aims to integrate these seemingly contradictory concerns.We consider whether mothers’ and fathers’ rewards from combining employment with childcare may be protective for children’s mental health, and whether their conflicts and dilemmas generate risks. Analyses use cross-sectional data from a representative survey of families with 4e5 year old children (Growing Up in Australia Study). We restricted our sample to employed parents (N ¼ 2809 mothers; 3982 fathers), using data gathered in 2004. While a majority of parents reported benefits and rewards from working (work-family facilitation), more than one third also reported difficulties and conflicts (workfamily conflict). When mothers or fathers experienced conflict we found elevations in young children’semotional and behavioural symptoms, with the risks compounding if both parents experienced conflict between work and family. Associations persisted after adjusting for family socioeconomic circumstances and composition, and they were not offset by work-family facilitation. We did not find evidence for heightened vulnerability to work-family conflict in families with few socioeconomic resources. However, among these disadvantaged families we observed stronger protective associations with children’s mentalhealth when parents had rewarding and supportive jobs. Our study extends current paradigms of child mental health by considering the interplay between care environments and market work. Jobs which help mothers and fathers to combine employment with caregiving could yield health benefits acrossgenerations.

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.03.030

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.03.030

M3 - Article

VL - 87

SP - 99

EP - 107

JO - Social Science Medicine Social Science Medicine

JF - Social Science Medicine Social Science Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

ER -