Commentary: Improvements in Cycling Time Trial Performance Are Not Sustained Following the Acute Provision of Challenging and Deceptive Feedback

Ren-Jay Shei; Emily M Adamic; John S. Raglin; Kevin G Thompson; Timothy D Mickleborough

doi:10.3389/fphys.2017.00031

Commentary: Improvements in Cycling Time Trial Performance Are Not Sustained Following the Acute Provision of Challenging and Deceptive Feedback

Ren-Jay Shei, Emily M Adamic, John S. Raglin, Kevin G Thompson, Timothy D Mickleborough

UC Research Institute for Sport & Exercise

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

82 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We read with interest the recent study by Jones et al. (2016) who found performance gains elicited by deceptive feedback were not sustained in a subsequent ride-alone time trial (TT). Although they employed a design somewhat similar to a study from our laboratory (Shei et al., 2016), we feel the discrepancies between their findings and ours are the result of several methodological differences.

Original language	English
Article number	31
Pages (from-to)	1-3
Number of pages	3
Journal	Frontiers in Physiology
Volume	8
Issue number	JAN
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00031
Publication status	Published - 25 Jan 2017

Access to Document

10.3389/fphys.2017.00031Licence: CC BY

ArticleFinal published version, 223 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{31b5f861bc864758a7d9d4298af2a35b,

title = "Commentary: Improvements in Cycling Time Trial Performance Are Not Sustained Following the Acute Provision of Challenging and Deceptive Feedback",

abstract = "We read with interest the recent study by Jones et al. (2016) who found performance gains elicited by deceptive feedback were not sustained in a subsequent ride-alone time trial (TT). Although they employed a design somewhat similar to a study from our laboratory (Shei et al., 2016), we feel the discrepancies between their findings and ours are the result of several methodological differences.",

keywords = "pacing strategy, competition, deception, power output, feedback, Competition, Pacing strategy, Power output, Feedback, Deception",

author = "Ren-Jay Shei and Adamic, {Emily M} and Raglin, {John S.} and Thompson, {Kevin G} and Mickleborough, {Timothy D}",

year = "2017",

month = jan,

day = "25",

doi = "10.3389/fphys.2017.00031",

language = "English",

volume = "8",

pages = "1--3",

journal = "Frontiers in Physiology",

issn = "1664-042X",

publisher = "Frontiers Media S.A.",

number = "JAN",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Commentary

T2 - Improvements in Cycling Time Trial Performance Are Not Sustained Following the Acute Provision of Challenging and Deceptive Feedback

AU - Shei, Ren-Jay

AU - Adamic, Emily M

AU - Raglin, John S.

AU - Thompson, Kevin G

AU - Mickleborough, Timothy D

PY - 2017/1/25

Y1 - 2017/1/25

N2 - We read with interest the recent study by Jones et al. (2016) who found performance gains elicited by deceptive feedback were not sustained in a subsequent ride-alone time trial (TT). Although they employed a design somewhat similar to a study from our laboratory (Shei et al., 2016), we feel the discrepancies between their findings and ours are the result of several methodological differences.

AB - We read with interest the recent study by Jones et al. (2016) who found performance gains elicited by deceptive feedback were not sustained in a subsequent ride-alone time trial (TT). Although they employed a design somewhat similar to a study from our laboratory (Shei et al., 2016), we feel the discrepancies between their findings and ours are the result of several methodological differences.

KW - pacing strategy

KW - competition

KW - deception

KW - power output

KW - feedback

KW - Competition

KW - Pacing strategy

KW - Power output

KW - Feedback

KW - Deception

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011827542&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/commentary-improvements-cycling-time-trial-performance-not-sustained-following-acute-provision-chall

U2 - 10.3389/fphys.2017.00031

DO - 10.3389/fphys.2017.00031

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 28179888

SN - 1664-042X

VL - 8

SP - 1

EP - 3

JO - Frontiers in Physiology

JF - Frontiers in Physiology

IS - JAN

M1 - 31

ER -

Commentary: Improvements in Cycling Time Trial Performance Are Not Sustained Following the Acute Provision of Challenging and Deceptive Feedback

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this