Commentary

Improvements in Cycling Time Trial Performance Are Not Sustained Following the Acute Provision of Challenging and Deceptive Feedback

Ren-Jay Shei, Emily M Adamic, John S. Raglin, Kevin G Thompson, Timothy D Mickleborough

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

    1 Citation (Scopus)
    7 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    We read with interest the recent study by Jones et al. (2016) who found performance gains elicited by deceptive feedback were not sustained in a subsequent ride-alone time trial (TT). Although they employed a design somewhat similar to a study from our laboratory (Shei et al., 2016), we feel the discrepancies between their findings and ours are the result of several methodological differences.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number31
    Pages (from-to)1-3
    Number of pages3
    JournalFrontiers in Physiology
    Volume8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 25 Jan 2017

    Cite this

    @article{31b5f861bc864758a7d9d4298af2a35b,
    title = "Commentary: Improvements in Cycling Time Trial Performance Are Not Sustained Following the Acute Provision of Challenging and Deceptive Feedback",
    abstract = "We read with interest the recent study by Jones et al. (2016) who found performance gains elicited by deceptive feedback were not sustained in a subsequent ride-alone time trial (TT). Although they employed a design somewhat similar to a study from our laboratory (Shei et al., 2016), we feel the discrepancies between their findings and ours are the result of several methodological differences.",
    keywords = "pacing strategy, competition, deception, power output, feedback",
    author = "Ren-Jay Shei and Adamic, {Emily M} and Raglin, {John S.} and Thompson, {Kevin G} and Mickleborough, {Timothy D}",
    year = "2017",
    month = "1",
    day = "25",
    doi = "10.3389/fphys.2017.00031",
    language = "English",
    volume = "8",
    pages = "1--3",
    journal = "Frontiers in Physiology",
    issn = "1664-042X",
    publisher = "Frontiers Media S.A.",

    }

    Commentary : Improvements in Cycling Time Trial Performance Are Not Sustained Following the Acute Provision of Challenging and Deceptive Feedback. / Shei, Ren-Jay; Adamic, Emily M; Raglin, John S.; Thompson, Kevin G; Mickleborough, Timothy D.

    In: Frontiers in Physiology, Vol. 8, 31, 25.01.2017, p. 1-3.

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Commentary

    T2 - Improvements in Cycling Time Trial Performance Are Not Sustained Following the Acute Provision of Challenging and Deceptive Feedback

    AU - Shei, Ren-Jay

    AU - Adamic, Emily M

    AU - Raglin, John S.

    AU - Thompson, Kevin G

    AU - Mickleborough, Timothy D

    PY - 2017/1/25

    Y1 - 2017/1/25

    N2 - We read with interest the recent study by Jones et al. (2016) who found performance gains elicited by deceptive feedback were not sustained in a subsequent ride-alone time trial (TT). Although they employed a design somewhat similar to a study from our laboratory (Shei et al., 2016), we feel the discrepancies between their findings and ours are the result of several methodological differences.

    AB - We read with interest the recent study by Jones et al. (2016) who found performance gains elicited by deceptive feedback were not sustained in a subsequent ride-alone time trial (TT). Although they employed a design somewhat similar to a study from our laboratory (Shei et al., 2016), we feel the discrepancies between their findings and ours are the result of several methodological differences.

    KW - pacing strategy

    KW - competition

    KW - deception

    KW - power output

    KW - feedback

    U2 - 10.3389/fphys.2017.00031

    DO - 10.3389/fphys.2017.00031

    M3 - Comment/debate

    VL - 8

    SP - 1

    EP - 3

    JO - Frontiers in Physiology

    JF - Frontiers in Physiology

    SN - 1664-042X

    M1 - 31

    ER -