Abstract
We provide a commentary and critique on two recently published articles (Boysen et al., 2022; Boysen & Isaacs, 2022) about sexual exploitation of people who experience mental illness as evolutionarily adaptive. We suggest that the studies in both these articles have conceptual and methodological issues that misrepresent the extent to which actual mental illness is a cue to sexual exploitability. Our concerns include the presentation of mental illness as a unitary construct, that the cues suggested are not representative of actual mental illness, and that the evolutionary arguments about sexually exploiting people with mental illness are weak. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 289-293 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2022 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Commentary on Boysen and Isaacs (2022) and Boysen et al. (2022)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver