TY - JOUR
T1 - Commentary on: Peters & Galvaan (2020) A scoping review exploring 'opportunity' in occupational science: Possibilities for conceptual development
AU - Pereira, Robert B.
N1 - Funding Information:
I acknowledge the Traditional Owners of the land, the Wadawurrung people of the Kulin Nation. I thank the Traditional Owners for custodianship of the land and celebrate the continuing culture of the Wadawurrung people, acknowledging the memory of honourable ancestors. I sincerely thank Dr Nerida Hyett, Dr Daniela Castro de Jong, and Professor Gail Whiteford, as well as the editors and reviewers, for their insightful comments and review of an earlier draft of this paper. In acknowledging their helpful critique, I am not claiming that they share the views expressed or that their opinions are the same as mine.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Journal of Occupational Science Incorporated.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Opportunity is an acknowledged, yet ‘taken-for-granted’ concept in occupational science, and specifically within occupational justice discourse. This paper presents a commentary on Peters and Galvaan’s (2020) scoping review on the conceptualization of opportunity within occupation-based disciplines. The commentary focuses on three points: The first is the lack of definitional clarity on key terms identified by the authors, highlighting a need for research to advance how opportunity is conceptualized. The second provides a response to the findings of the first theme; “Opportunity conceptualized as synonymous with capabilities”. Third, the commentary concludes by suggesting how the discipline of occupational science could expand on both the conceptualization and operationalization of opportunity, by introducing moral and political philosopher Axel Honneth’s (1992, 1995, 2001) ‘Theory of Recognition’, to conceptualize intrinsic and interpersonal recognition as a key precursor for opportunity as it relates to notions of equity, power, and justice.
AB - Opportunity is an acknowledged, yet ‘taken-for-granted’ concept in occupational science, and specifically within occupational justice discourse. This paper presents a commentary on Peters and Galvaan’s (2020) scoping review on the conceptualization of opportunity within occupation-based disciplines. The commentary focuses on three points: The first is the lack of definitional clarity on key terms identified by the authors, highlighting a need for research to advance how opportunity is conceptualized. The second provides a response to the findings of the first theme; “Opportunity conceptualized as synonymous with capabilities”. Third, the commentary concludes by suggesting how the discipline of occupational science could expand on both the conceptualization and operationalization of opportunity, by introducing moral and political philosopher Axel Honneth’s (1992, 1995, 2001) ‘Theory of Recognition’, to conceptualize intrinsic and interpersonal recognition as a key precursor for opportunity as it relates to notions of equity, power, and justice.
KW - Occupational science
KW - Occupational justice
KW - Opportunity
KW - Capabilities
KW - Recognition
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097591176&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14427591.2020.1853595
DO - 10.1080/14427591.2020.1853595
M3 - Comment/debate
SN - 1442-7591
VL - 28
SP - 268
EP - 273
JO - Journal of Occupational Science
JF - Journal of Occupational Science
IS - 2
ER -