TY - JOUR
T1 - Comorbid morphological disorder apparent in some children aged 4-5 years with childhood apraxia of speech
T2 - Findings from standardised testing
AU - Murray, Elizabeth
AU - Thomas, Donna
AU - McKechnie, Jacqueline
N1 - Funding Information:
We wish to thank all of the participants and their families for their participation in the research project. We acknowledge the following sources of funding that supported data collection: the Douglas and Lola Douglas Scholarship on Child and Adolescent Health; Nadia Verrall Memorial 2010 and Postgraduate Student Scholarship 2011 through Speech Pathology Australia, James Kentley Memorial Scholarship, Postgraduate Research Support Schemes and Faculty of Health Sciences funding to Elizabeth Murray; Australian Postgraduate Award 2012, Postgraduate Research Grant 2013 from Speech Pathology Australia, Deirdre Russell Memorial Scholarship 2013, Postgraduate Research Support Scheme and Faculty of Health Sciences funding to Jacqueline McKechnie and Australian Postgraduate Award, Speech Pathology Australia Post Graduate Research Grant, Postgraduate Research Support Scheme and Faculty of Health Sciences funding to Donna Thomas.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, © 2018 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - There is continuing debate about the origins of productive morphological errors in children with speech sound disorders. This is the case for children with theorised phonetic and motor disorders, such as children with childhood apraxia of speech (CAS, e.g., Ekelman & Aram, 1983; McNeill & Gillon, 2013). The morphological skills of children with CAS remain relatively unexplored in pre-schoolers. We investigated English morphology in a retrospective, cross-sectional design of 26 children aged 4–5 years who completed the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals—Preschool (2nd edition; Wiig, Secord & Semel, 2006). The research aims were to determine: (1) the language profile of the children, (2) the accuracy of each morpheme type produced, and (3) how many of those morphological errors are explained by speech errors (clusters, late developing phonemes, central vowels or weak syllable stress)? The results indicate the group of children with CAS had poorer expressive language skills than receptive skills and 48% demonstrated difficulties with morphology in word structure and recalling sentences subtests. The children had poor accuracy and inconsistent production of a range of morphemes and despite many errors due to the speech characteristics of the stimuli on the CELF-P2, motor speech concerns could not explain all the child’s morphological errors. The results suggest morphological difficulties are co-morbid to CAS and when this occurs, treatment for morphosyntax is indicated. There are also significant clinical implications in the assessment of morphosyntax for children with CAS which are discussed.
AB - There is continuing debate about the origins of productive morphological errors in children with speech sound disorders. This is the case for children with theorised phonetic and motor disorders, such as children with childhood apraxia of speech (CAS, e.g., Ekelman & Aram, 1983; McNeill & Gillon, 2013). The morphological skills of children with CAS remain relatively unexplored in pre-schoolers. We investigated English morphology in a retrospective, cross-sectional design of 26 children aged 4–5 years who completed the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals—Preschool (2nd edition; Wiig, Secord & Semel, 2006). The research aims were to determine: (1) the language profile of the children, (2) the accuracy of each morpheme type produced, and (3) how many of those morphological errors are explained by speech errors (clusters, late developing phonemes, central vowels or weak syllable stress)? The results indicate the group of children with CAS had poorer expressive language skills than receptive skills and 48% demonstrated difficulties with morphology in word structure and recalling sentences subtests. The children had poor accuracy and inconsistent production of a range of morphemes and despite many errors due to the speech characteristics of the stimuli on the CELF-P2, motor speech concerns could not explain all the child’s morphological errors. The results suggest morphological difficulties are co-morbid to CAS and when this occurs, treatment for morphosyntax is indicated. There are also significant clinical implications in the assessment of morphosyntax for children with CAS which are discussed.
KW - apraxia
KW - assessment
KW - Morphology
KW - prosody
KW - speech
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053335583&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/comorbid-morphological-disorder-apparent-some-children-aged-45-years-childhood-apraxia-speech-findin
U2 - 10.1080/02699206.2018.1513565
DO - 10.1080/02699206.2018.1513565
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85053335583
SN - 0269-9206
VL - 33
SP - 42
EP - 59
JO - Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics
JF - Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics
IS - 1-2
ER -