Comparing test systems to measure the salinity tolerance of freshwater invertebrates

B.J. Kefford, C.G. Palmer, L. Pakhomova, D. Nugegoda

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    27 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    There have recently been several studies into acute salinity tolerance of freshwater invertebrates using different methods, making comparisons between studies difficult. The alternatives focus on experimental flow regimes and ionic proportions. In this study non-rheophilic riverine taxa collected in South Africa and south-east Australia were variously exposed to solutions of sodium chloride (NaCl) and the artificial sea salt, Ocean Nature, in flowing and still water. South African species: Euthraulus elegans (Ephemeroptera: Leptophlebiidae), Micronecta piccanina (Hemiptera: Corixidae), Burnupia stenochorias (Gastropoda: Ancylidae) and Caridina nilotica (Decapoda: Atyidae); Australian collected species: Daphnia carinata (Cladocera: Daphniidae), Micronecta annae and Physa acuta (Gastropoda: Physidae). The main findings were: • The salinity tolerances of a range of taxa were not affected by flow regimes • Taxa were less sensitive to the artificial sea salt than NaCl • There was, however, a direct relationship between the LC50 values from both salts. This relationship was used to compare the LC 50 values from studies testing (artificial or natural) sea-water or NaCl. • The comparison indicated variation in the mean LC50 between studies that is probably, at least in part, due to the range of taxonomic groups and rarities of species tested. When comparing the acute salinity tolerance of non-rheophilic invertebrates, the salt source and criteria for choosing species affect the results, but the flow environment probably does not.
    Original languageUndefined
    Pages (from-to)499-506
    Number of pages8
    JournalWater SA
    Volume30
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2004

    Cite this

    Kefford, B.J. ; Palmer, C.G. ; Pakhomova, L. ; Nugegoda, D. / Comparing test systems to measure the salinity tolerance of freshwater invertebrates. In: Water SA. 2004 ; Vol. 30, No. 4. pp. 499-506.
    @article{4f20d967bad64b70a52d64df1a238b16,
    title = "Comparing test systems to measure the salinity tolerance of freshwater invertebrates",
    abstract = "There have recently been several studies into acute salinity tolerance of freshwater invertebrates using different methods, making comparisons between studies difficult. The alternatives focus on experimental flow regimes and ionic proportions. In this study non-rheophilic riverine taxa collected in South Africa and south-east Australia were variously exposed to solutions of sodium chloride (NaCl) and the artificial sea salt, Ocean Nature, in flowing and still water. South African species: Euthraulus elegans (Ephemeroptera: Leptophlebiidae), Micronecta piccanina (Hemiptera: Corixidae), Burnupia stenochorias (Gastropoda: Ancylidae) and Caridina nilotica (Decapoda: Atyidae); Australian collected species: Daphnia carinata (Cladocera: Daphniidae), Micronecta annae and Physa acuta (Gastropoda: Physidae). The main findings were: • The salinity tolerances of a range of taxa were not affected by flow regimes • Taxa were less sensitive to the artificial sea salt than NaCl • There was, however, a direct relationship between the LC50 values from both salts. This relationship was used to compare the LC 50 values from studies testing (artificial or natural) sea-water or NaCl. • The comparison indicated variation in the mean LC50 between studies that is probably, at least in part, due to the range of taxonomic groups and rarities of species tested. When comparing the acute salinity tolerance of non-rheophilic invertebrates, the salt source and criteria for choosing species affect the results, but the flow environment probably does not.",
    author = "B.J. Kefford and C.G. Palmer and L. Pakhomova and D. Nugegoda",
    note = "cited By 26",
    year = "2004",
    doi = "10.4314/wsa.v30i4.5102",
    language = "Undefined",
    volume = "30",
    pages = "499--506",
    journal = "Water S.A.",
    issn = "0378-4738",
    publisher = "South African Water Research Commission",
    number = "4",

    }

    Comparing test systems to measure the salinity tolerance of freshwater invertebrates. / Kefford, B.J.; Palmer, C.G.; Pakhomova, L.; Nugegoda, D.

    In: Water SA, Vol. 30, No. 4, 2004, p. 499-506.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Comparing test systems to measure the salinity tolerance of freshwater invertebrates

    AU - Kefford, B.J.

    AU - Palmer, C.G.

    AU - Pakhomova, L.

    AU - Nugegoda, D.

    N1 - cited By 26

    PY - 2004

    Y1 - 2004

    N2 - There have recently been several studies into acute salinity tolerance of freshwater invertebrates using different methods, making comparisons between studies difficult. The alternatives focus on experimental flow regimes and ionic proportions. In this study non-rheophilic riverine taxa collected in South Africa and south-east Australia were variously exposed to solutions of sodium chloride (NaCl) and the artificial sea salt, Ocean Nature, in flowing and still water. South African species: Euthraulus elegans (Ephemeroptera: Leptophlebiidae), Micronecta piccanina (Hemiptera: Corixidae), Burnupia stenochorias (Gastropoda: Ancylidae) and Caridina nilotica (Decapoda: Atyidae); Australian collected species: Daphnia carinata (Cladocera: Daphniidae), Micronecta annae and Physa acuta (Gastropoda: Physidae). The main findings were: • The salinity tolerances of a range of taxa were not affected by flow regimes • Taxa were less sensitive to the artificial sea salt than NaCl • There was, however, a direct relationship between the LC50 values from both salts. This relationship was used to compare the LC 50 values from studies testing (artificial or natural) sea-water or NaCl. • The comparison indicated variation in the mean LC50 between studies that is probably, at least in part, due to the range of taxonomic groups and rarities of species tested. When comparing the acute salinity tolerance of non-rheophilic invertebrates, the salt source and criteria for choosing species affect the results, but the flow environment probably does not.

    AB - There have recently been several studies into acute salinity tolerance of freshwater invertebrates using different methods, making comparisons between studies difficult. The alternatives focus on experimental flow regimes and ionic proportions. In this study non-rheophilic riverine taxa collected in South Africa and south-east Australia were variously exposed to solutions of sodium chloride (NaCl) and the artificial sea salt, Ocean Nature, in flowing and still water. South African species: Euthraulus elegans (Ephemeroptera: Leptophlebiidae), Micronecta piccanina (Hemiptera: Corixidae), Burnupia stenochorias (Gastropoda: Ancylidae) and Caridina nilotica (Decapoda: Atyidae); Australian collected species: Daphnia carinata (Cladocera: Daphniidae), Micronecta annae and Physa acuta (Gastropoda: Physidae). The main findings were: • The salinity tolerances of a range of taxa were not affected by flow regimes • Taxa were less sensitive to the artificial sea salt than NaCl • There was, however, a direct relationship between the LC50 values from both salts. This relationship was used to compare the LC 50 values from studies testing (artificial or natural) sea-water or NaCl. • The comparison indicated variation in the mean LC50 between studies that is probably, at least in part, due to the range of taxonomic groups and rarities of species tested. When comparing the acute salinity tolerance of non-rheophilic invertebrates, the salt source and criteria for choosing species affect the results, but the flow environment probably does not.

    UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-8444237134&origin=inward&txGid=206014e9c32201c811c5d38637b1e972

    U2 - 10.4314/wsa.v30i4.5102

    DO - 10.4314/wsa.v30i4.5102

    M3 - Article

    VL - 30

    SP - 499

    EP - 506

    JO - Water S.A.

    JF - Water S.A.

    SN - 0378-4738

    IS - 4

    ER -