Comparing the atmosphere to a bathtub: Effectiveness of analogy for reasoning about accumulation

Sophie Guy, Yoshihisa Kashima, Iain WALKER, Saffron O'Neill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Understanding the process of accumulation is fundamental to recognising the magnitude and speed of emissions reduction required to stabilise atmospheric CO2 and, hence, global temperature. This research investigated the effectiveness of analogy for building understanding of accumulation among non-experts. Two studies tested the effects of analogy and graphical information on: (1) performance on a CO2 stabilisation task; and (2) preferred level of action on climate change. Study 1 was conducted with a sample of undergraduate students and Study 2, with a sample of the Australian public. In the student sample, analogical processing significantly improved task performance when information about emission rates was presented in text but not when it was presented in graph format. It was also associated with greater preference for strong action on climate change. When tested with the public, analogy and information format independently influenced task performance. Furthermore, there was a marginal effect of education such that the analogy especially might have helped those with at least high school attainment. Our results show that analogy can improve non-experts’ understanding of CO2 accumulation but that using graphs to convey emissions rate information is detrimental to such improvements. The results should be of interest to climate change communicators, advocates, and policy-makers
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)579-594
Number of pages16
JournalClimatic Change
Volume121
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

atmosphere
climate change
student
stabilization
education
temperature
rate
public
effect
policy
speed
emission reduction
school

Cite this

Guy, Sophie ; Kashima, Yoshihisa ; WALKER, Iain ; O'Neill, Saffron. / Comparing the atmosphere to a bathtub: Effectiveness of analogy for reasoning about accumulation. In: Climatic Change. 2013 ; Vol. 121, No. 4. pp. 579-594.
@article{abff916205ee41908a0d39a6f560d3df,
title = "Comparing the atmosphere to a bathtub: Effectiveness of analogy for reasoning about accumulation",
abstract = "Understanding the process of accumulation is fundamental to recognising the magnitude and speed of emissions reduction required to stabilise atmospheric CO2 and, hence, global temperature. This research investigated the effectiveness of analogy for building understanding of accumulation among non-experts. Two studies tested the effects of analogy and graphical information on: (1) performance on a CO2 stabilisation task; and (2) preferred level of action on climate change. Study 1 was conducted with a sample of undergraduate students and Study 2, with a sample of the Australian public. In the student sample, analogical processing significantly improved task performance when information about emission rates was presented in text but not when it was presented in graph format. It was also associated with greater preference for strong action on climate change. When tested with the public, analogy and information format independently influenced task performance. Furthermore, there was a marginal effect of education such that the analogy especially might have helped those with at least high school attainment. Our results show that analogy can improve non-experts’ understanding of CO2 accumulation but that using graphs to convey emissions rate information is detrimental to such improvements. The results should be of interest to climate change communicators, advocates, and policy-makers",
author = "Sophie Guy and Yoshihisa Kashima and Iain WALKER and Saffron O'Neill",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1007/s10584-013-0949-3",
language = "English",
volume = "121",
pages = "579--594",
journal = "Climatic Change",
issn = "0165-0009",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "4",

}

Comparing the atmosphere to a bathtub: Effectiveness of analogy for reasoning about accumulation. / Guy, Sophie; Kashima, Yoshihisa; WALKER, Iain; O'Neill, Saffron.

In: Climatic Change, Vol. 121, No. 4, 2013, p. 579-594.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing the atmosphere to a bathtub: Effectiveness of analogy for reasoning about accumulation

AU - Guy, Sophie

AU - Kashima, Yoshihisa

AU - WALKER, Iain

AU - O'Neill, Saffron

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Understanding the process of accumulation is fundamental to recognising the magnitude and speed of emissions reduction required to stabilise atmospheric CO2 and, hence, global temperature. This research investigated the effectiveness of analogy for building understanding of accumulation among non-experts. Two studies tested the effects of analogy and graphical information on: (1) performance on a CO2 stabilisation task; and (2) preferred level of action on climate change. Study 1 was conducted with a sample of undergraduate students and Study 2, with a sample of the Australian public. In the student sample, analogical processing significantly improved task performance when information about emission rates was presented in text but not when it was presented in graph format. It was also associated with greater preference for strong action on climate change. When tested with the public, analogy and information format independently influenced task performance. Furthermore, there was a marginal effect of education such that the analogy especially might have helped those with at least high school attainment. Our results show that analogy can improve non-experts’ understanding of CO2 accumulation but that using graphs to convey emissions rate information is detrimental to such improvements. The results should be of interest to climate change communicators, advocates, and policy-makers

AB - Understanding the process of accumulation is fundamental to recognising the magnitude and speed of emissions reduction required to stabilise atmospheric CO2 and, hence, global temperature. This research investigated the effectiveness of analogy for building understanding of accumulation among non-experts. Two studies tested the effects of analogy and graphical information on: (1) performance on a CO2 stabilisation task; and (2) preferred level of action on climate change. Study 1 was conducted with a sample of undergraduate students and Study 2, with a sample of the Australian public. In the student sample, analogical processing significantly improved task performance when information about emission rates was presented in text but not when it was presented in graph format. It was also associated with greater preference for strong action on climate change. When tested with the public, analogy and information format independently influenced task performance. Furthermore, there was a marginal effect of education such that the analogy especially might have helped those with at least high school attainment. Our results show that analogy can improve non-experts’ understanding of CO2 accumulation but that using graphs to convey emissions rate information is detrimental to such improvements. The results should be of interest to climate change communicators, advocates, and policy-makers

U2 - 10.1007/s10584-013-0949-3

DO - 10.1007/s10584-013-0949-3

M3 - Article

VL - 121

SP - 579

EP - 594

JO - Climatic Change

JF - Climatic Change

SN - 0165-0009

IS - 4

ER -