TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison between nanosecond and femtosecond laser pulses for the removal of spray paint from granite surfaces
AU - Brand, Julia
AU - Wain, Alison
AU - Rode, Andrei
AU - Madden, Steve
AU - Rapp, Ludovic
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge Shane Paxton, formerly from the Research School of Earth Sciences, and Michael Turner from the Department of Applied Mathematics in the Research School of Physics, for the preparation of stone samples. The authors also acknowledge the Department of Electronic Materials Engineering (EME) for access to the Raman spectrometer, and the Research School of Earth Sciences for access to the SEM. The research was supported by the Australian Government through the Australian Research Council's Linkage Project funding scheme (Project LP180100276 ) and funding provided by Transport for New South Wales . King was partially supported by DP200100406 .
Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge Shane Paxton, formerly from the Research School of Earth Sciences, and Michael Turner from the Department of Applied Mathematics in the Research School of Physics, for the preparation of stone samples. The authors also acknowledge the Department of Electronic Materials Engineering (EME) for access to the Raman spectrometer, and the Research School of Earth Sciences for access to the SEM. The research was supported by the Australian Government through the Australian Research Council's Linkage Project funding scheme (Project LP180100276) and funding provided by Transport for New South Wales. King was partially supported by DP200100406.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023
PY - 2023/7/1
Y1 - 2023/7/1
N2 - We investigated the removal of spray paint from heritage granite surfaces using a nanosecond pulse laser and compared the results, in terms of the effectiveness of treatment and preservation of the stone surface from potential damage, with results obtained using a femtosecond pulse laser. We show that, with the nanosecond laser, the ablation threshold of the stone was measured at 0.5 J·cm-2, but it was only possible to remove certain types of spray paints, such as blue and green paints, at a higher fluence of 0.9 J·cm-2. To remove other types of paints, such as red and yellow, it was necessary to increase even further the laser fluence to 1.5 J·cm-2, well above the ablation threshold of the stone. In this case, damage was induced in the minerals, such as melting of biotite, and a general roughening of the other minerals’ surfaces was observed. Despite nanosecond pulse lasers being more widespread for cleaning purposes, we demonstrate that femtosecond pulse lasers allowed better effectiveness in removing various colours of paint, without leaving residues, while keeping the laser energy below the damage threshold of the underlying stone, allowing complete preservation of the substrate, and avoiding the melting of the most sensitive mineral grains (particularly biotite). We determined the ablation efficiency of spray paint using the femtosecond pulse laser and found a maximum ablation regime centered around 6.2 J·cm-2, at 8.36 mm3·(min·W)-1. This study highlights the benefits of using a laser with femtosecond pulses instead of longer pulse durations (nanosecond range) for the preservation and maintenance of heritage stone.
AB - We investigated the removal of spray paint from heritage granite surfaces using a nanosecond pulse laser and compared the results, in terms of the effectiveness of treatment and preservation of the stone surface from potential damage, with results obtained using a femtosecond pulse laser. We show that, with the nanosecond laser, the ablation threshold of the stone was measured at 0.5 J·cm-2, but it was only possible to remove certain types of spray paints, such as blue and green paints, at a higher fluence of 0.9 J·cm-2. To remove other types of paints, such as red and yellow, it was necessary to increase even further the laser fluence to 1.5 J·cm-2, well above the ablation threshold of the stone. In this case, damage was induced in the minerals, such as melting of biotite, and a general roughening of the other minerals’ surfaces was observed. Despite nanosecond pulse lasers being more widespread for cleaning purposes, we demonstrate that femtosecond pulse lasers allowed better effectiveness in removing various colours of paint, without leaving residues, while keeping the laser energy below the damage threshold of the underlying stone, allowing complete preservation of the substrate, and avoiding the melting of the most sensitive mineral grains (particularly biotite). We determined the ablation efficiency of spray paint using the femtosecond pulse laser and found a maximum ablation regime centered around 6.2 J·cm-2, at 8.36 mm3·(min·W)-1. This study highlights the benefits of using a laser with femtosecond pulses instead of longer pulse durations (nanosecond range) for the preservation and maintenance of heritage stone.
KW - Femtosecond pulse laser
KW - Graffiti
KW - Granite
KW - Heritage
KW - Laser cleaning
KW - Nanosecond pulse laser
KW - Spray paint
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85162918839&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.culher.2023.06.005
DO - 10.1016/j.culher.2023.06.005
M3 - Article
SN - 1296-2074
VL - 62
SP - 329
EP - 338
JO - Journal of Cultural Heritage
JF - Journal of Cultural Heritage
ER -