Comparison of activity profiles and physiological demands between international rugby sevens matches and training

Dean G Higham, David B Pyne, Judith M Anson, Will G Hopkins, Anthony Eddy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The specificity of contemporary training practices of international rugby sevens players is unknown. We quantified the positional group-specific activity profiles and physiological demands of on-field training activities and compared these with match demands. Twenty-two international matches and 63 rugby-specific training drills were monitored in 25 backs and 17 forwards from a national squad of male rugby sevens players over a 21-month period. Drills were classified into 3 categories: low-intensity skill refining (n = 23 drills, 560 observations), moderate- to high-intensity skill refining (n = 28 drills, 600 observations), and game simulation (n = 12 drills, 365 observations). Movement patterns (via Global Positioning System devices) and physiological load (via heart rate monitors) were recorded for all activities, and the differences between training and matches were quantified using magnitude-based inferential statistics. Distance covered in total and at ≥3.5 m·s, maximal velocity, and frequency of accelerations and decelerations were lower for forwards during competition compared with those for backs by a small but practically important magnitude. No clear positional group differences were observed for physiological load during matches. Training demands exceeded match demands only for frequency of decelerations of forwards during moderate- to high-intensity skill-refining drills and only by a small amount. Accelerations and distance covered at ≥6 m·s were closer to match values for forwards than for backs during all training activities, but training drills consistently fell below the demands of international competition. Coaches could therefore improve physical and physiological specificity by increasing the movement demands and intensity of training drills.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1287-1294
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Volume30
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2016

Fingerprint

Mandrillus
Football
Deceleration
Teaching
Geographic Information Systems
Heart Rate
Equipment and Supplies

Cite this

@article{c90350f3771a4f3e815496b2d20717ef,
title = "Comparison of activity profiles and physiological demands between international rugby sevens matches and training",
abstract = "The specificity of contemporary training practices of international rugby sevens players is unknown. We quantified the positional group-specific activity profiles and physiological demands of on-field training activities and compared these with match demands. Twenty-two international matches and 63 rugby-specific training drills were monitored in 25 backs and 17 forwards from a national squad of male rugby sevens players over a 21-month period. Drills were classified into 3 categories: low-intensity skill refining (n = 23 drills, 560 observations), moderate- to high-intensity skill refining (n = 28 drills, 600 observations), and game simulation (n = 12 drills, 365 observations). Movement patterns (via Global Positioning System devices) and physiological load (via heart rate monitors) were recorded for all activities, and the differences between training and matches were quantified using magnitude-based inferential statistics. Distance covered in total and at ≥3.5 m·s, maximal velocity, and frequency of accelerations and decelerations were lower for forwards during competition compared with those for backs by a small but practically important magnitude. No clear positional group differences were observed for physiological load during matches. Training demands exceeded match demands only for frequency of decelerations of forwards during moderate- to high-intensity skill-refining drills and only by a small amount. Accelerations and distance covered at ≥6 m·s were closer to match values for forwards than for backs during all training activities, but training drills consistently fell below the demands of international competition. Coaches could therefore improve physical and physiological specificity by increasing the movement demands and intensity of training drills.",
keywords = "Athletic Performance, Football, Geographic Information Systems, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Physical Conditioning, Human, Physical Exertion, Prospective Studies, Running, Young Adult, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Observational Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't",
author = "Higham, {Dean G} and Pyne, {David B} and Anson, {Judith M} and Hopkins, {Will G} and Anthony Eddy",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1097/JSC.0000000000000212",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "1287--1294",
journal = "Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research",
issn = "1064-8011",
publisher = "NSCA National Strength and Conditioning Association",
number = "5",

}

Comparison of activity profiles and physiological demands between international rugby sevens matches and training. / Higham, Dean G; Pyne, David B; Anson, Judith M; Hopkins, Will G; Eddy, Anthony.

In: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, Vol. 30, No. 5, 05.2016, p. 1287-1294.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of activity profiles and physiological demands between international rugby sevens matches and training

AU - Higham, Dean G

AU - Pyne, David B

AU - Anson, Judith M

AU - Hopkins, Will G

AU - Eddy, Anthony

PY - 2016/5

Y1 - 2016/5

N2 - The specificity of contemporary training practices of international rugby sevens players is unknown. We quantified the positional group-specific activity profiles and physiological demands of on-field training activities and compared these with match demands. Twenty-two international matches and 63 rugby-specific training drills were monitored in 25 backs and 17 forwards from a national squad of male rugby sevens players over a 21-month period. Drills were classified into 3 categories: low-intensity skill refining (n = 23 drills, 560 observations), moderate- to high-intensity skill refining (n = 28 drills, 600 observations), and game simulation (n = 12 drills, 365 observations). Movement patterns (via Global Positioning System devices) and physiological load (via heart rate monitors) were recorded for all activities, and the differences between training and matches were quantified using magnitude-based inferential statistics. Distance covered in total and at ≥3.5 m·s, maximal velocity, and frequency of accelerations and decelerations were lower for forwards during competition compared with those for backs by a small but practically important magnitude. No clear positional group differences were observed for physiological load during matches. Training demands exceeded match demands only for frequency of decelerations of forwards during moderate- to high-intensity skill-refining drills and only by a small amount. Accelerations and distance covered at ≥6 m·s were closer to match values for forwards than for backs during all training activities, but training drills consistently fell below the demands of international competition. Coaches could therefore improve physical and physiological specificity by increasing the movement demands and intensity of training drills.

AB - The specificity of contemporary training practices of international rugby sevens players is unknown. We quantified the positional group-specific activity profiles and physiological demands of on-field training activities and compared these with match demands. Twenty-two international matches and 63 rugby-specific training drills were monitored in 25 backs and 17 forwards from a national squad of male rugby sevens players over a 21-month period. Drills were classified into 3 categories: low-intensity skill refining (n = 23 drills, 560 observations), moderate- to high-intensity skill refining (n = 28 drills, 600 observations), and game simulation (n = 12 drills, 365 observations). Movement patterns (via Global Positioning System devices) and physiological load (via heart rate monitors) were recorded for all activities, and the differences between training and matches were quantified using magnitude-based inferential statistics. Distance covered in total and at ≥3.5 m·s, maximal velocity, and frequency of accelerations and decelerations were lower for forwards during competition compared with those for backs by a small but practically important magnitude. No clear positional group differences were observed for physiological load during matches. Training demands exceeded match demands only for frequency of decelerations of forwards during moderate- to high-intensity skill-refining drills and only by a small amount. Accelerations and distance covered at ≥6 m·s were closer to match values for forwards than for backs during all training activities, but training drills consistently fell below the demands of international competition. Coaches could therefore improve physical and physiological specificity by increasing the movement demands and intensity of training drills.

KW - Athletic Performance

KW - Football

KW - Geographic Information Systems

KW - Humans

KW - Longitudinal Studies

KW - Male

KW - Physical Conditioning, Human

KW - Physical Exertion

KW - Prospective Studies

KW - Running

KW - Young Adult

KW - Comparative Study

KW - Journal Article

KW - Observational Study

KW - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

U2 - 10.1097/JSC.0000000000000212

DO - 10.1097/JSC.0000000000000212

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 1287

EP - 1294

JO - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

JF - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

SN - 1064-8011

IS - 5

ER -