Comparison of daily- and annual-increment counts in otoliths of bigeye (Thunnus obesus), yellowfin (T. albacares), southern bluefin (T. Maccoyii) and albacore (T. alalunga) tuna

Ashley J. Williams, Bruno M. Leroy, Simon J. Nicol, Jessica H. Farley, Naomi P. Clear, Kyne Krusic-Golub, Campbell R. Davies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Information on the age of individuals is often required for models assessing the status of stocks. Techniques used to estimate age of tuna have varied across species and agencies, precluding meta-analyses of age and growth. We compared age estimates obtained from commonly used ageing techniques for four important tuna species: bigeye tuna, yellowfin tuna, southern bluefin tuna, and albacore tuna. Estimates of age from counts of annual increments in transverse-sectioned otoliths were generally higher than those from counts of daily increments in transverse and longitudinal sections for all species, particularly for fish older than two years. However, annual counts produced younger estimates, on average, relative to daily counts for bigeye and yellowfin tuna younger than one year. Estimates derived from daily increments in longitudinal and transverse sections were generally similar, although longitudinal sections produced relatively older age estimates for individuals older than two years. A linear or non-linear increase in the magnitude of differences between ageing methods was the best-approximating model in all cases except when comparing daily-increment counts between transverse and longitudinal otolith sections for southern bluefin tuna. These observations are consistent with a narrowing of daily increments with increasing age, resulting in underestimates of age relative to those derived from annual increments. We conclude that (i) daily increments are unsuitable for ageing individuals over two years, especially for southern bluefin and albacore, (ii) longitudinal sections are more precise and produce older age estimates than transverse sections for daily-age estimates, (iii) there are considerable differences in these trends between species, likely dependent on longevity, and (iv) parameter estimates and/or conclusions based on meta-analyses using age data derived from different ageing methods are likely confounded with methodological biases. This result demonstrates that greater effort is required to provide consistent, validated methods for routine age determination to support the assessment and management of these valuable populations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1439-1450
Number of pages12
JournalICES Journal of Marine Science
Volume70
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Thunnus obesus
Thunnus alalunga
Thunnus albacares
tuna
otolith
otoliths
Thunnus maccoyii
comparison
methodology
age determination

Cite this

Williams, Ashley J. ; Leroy, Bruno M. ; Nicol, Simon J. ; Farley, Jessica H. ; Clear, Naomi P. ; Krusic-Golub, Kyne ; Davies, Campbell R. / Comparison of daily- and annual-increment counts in otoliths of bigeye (Thunnus obesus), yellowfin (T. albacares), southern bluefin (T. Maccoyii) and albacore (T. alalunga) tuna. In: ICES Journal of Marine Science. 2013 ; Vol. 70, No. 7. pp. 1439-1450.
@article{097db327f7a94588a497428b9f2d9c81,
title = "Comparison of daily- and annual-increment counts in otoliths of bigeye (Thunnus obesus), yellowfin (T. albacares), southern bluefin (T. Maccoyii) and albacore (T. alalunga) tuna",
abstract = "Information on the age of individuals is often required for models assessing the status of stocks. Techniques used to estimate age of tuna have varied across species and agencies, precluding meta-analyses of age and growth. We compared age estimates obtained from commonly used ageing techniques for four important tuna species: bigeye tuna, yellowfin tuna, southern bluefin tuna, and albacore tuna. Estimates of age from counts of annual increments in transverse-sectioned otoliths were generally higher than those from counts of daily increments in transverse and longitudinal sections for all species, particularly for fish older than two years. However, annual counts produced younger estimates, on average, relative to daily counts for bigeye and yellowfin tuna younger than one year. Estimates derived from daily increments in longitudinal and transverse sections were generally similar, although longitudinal sections produced relatively older age estimates for individuals older than two years. A linear or non-linear increase in the magnitude of differences between ageing methods was the best-approximating model in all cases except when comparing daily-increment counts between transverse and longitudinal otolith sections for southern bluefin tuna. These observations are consistent with a narrowing of daily increments with increasing age, resulting in underestimates of age relative to those derived from annual increments. We conclude that (i) daily increments are unsuitable for ageing individuals over two years, especially for southern bluefin and albacore, (ii) longitudinal sections are more precise and produce older age estimates than transverse sections for daily-age estimates, (iii) there are considerable differences in these trends between species, likely dependent on longevity, and (iv) parameter estimates and/or conclusions based on meta-analyses using age data derived from different ageing methods are likely confounded with methodological biases. This result demonstrates that greater effort is required to provide consistent, validated methods for routine age determination to support the assessment and management of these valuable populations.",
keywords = "age estimation, annual increments, daily increments, Pacific Ocean, sectioned otoliths, tuna",
author = "Williams, {Ashley J.} and Leroy, {Bruno M.} and Nicol, {Simon J.} and Farley, {Jessica H.} and Clear, {Naomi P.} and Kyne Krusic-Golub and Davies, {Campbell R.}",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/icesjms/fst093",
language = "English",
volume = "70",
pages = "1439--1450",
journal = "ICES Journal of Marine Science",
issn = "1054-3139",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "7",

}

Comparison of daily- and annual-increment counts in otoliths of bigeye (Thunnus obesus), yellowfin (T. albacares), southern bluefin (T. Maccoyii) and albacore (T. alalunga) tuna. / Williams, Ashley J.; Leroy, Bruno M.; Nicol, Simon J.; Farley, Jessica H.; Clear, Naomi P.; Krusic-Golub, Kyne; Davies, Campbell R.

In: ICES Journal of Marine Science, Vol. 70, No. 7, 01.11.2013, p. 1439-1450.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of daily- and annual-increment counts in otoliths of bigeye (Thunnus obesus), yellowfin (T. albacares), southern bluefin (T. Maccoyii) and albacore (T. alalunga) tuna

AU - Williams, Ashley J.

AU - Leroy, Bruno M.

AU - Nicol, Simon J.

AU - Farley, Jessica H.

AU - Clear, Naomi P.

AU - Krusic-Golub, Kyne

AU - Davies, Campbell R.

PY - 2013/11/1

Y1 - 2013/11/1

N2 - Information on the age of individuals is often required for models assessing the status of stocks. Techniques used to estimate age of tuna have varied across species and agencies, precluding meta-analyses of age and growth. We compared age estimates obtained from commonly used ageing techniques for four important tuna species: bigeye tuna, yellowfin tuna, southern bluefin tuna, and albacore tuna. Estimates of age from counts of annual increments in transverse-sectioned otoliths were generally higher than those from counts of daily increments in transverse and longitudinal sections for all species, particularly for fish older than two years. However, annual counts produced younger estimates, on average, relative to daily counts for bigeye and yellowfin tuna younger than one year. Estimates derived from daily increments in longitudinal and transverse sections were generally similar, although longitudinal sections produced relatively older age estimates for individuals older than two years. A linear or non-linear increase in the magnitude of differences between ageing methods was the best-approximating model in all cases except when comparing daily-increment counts between transverse and longitudinal otolith sections for southern bluefin tuna. These observations are consistent with a narrowing of daily increments with increasing age, resulting in underestimates of age relative to those derived from annual increments. We conclude that (i) daily increments are unsuitable for ageing individuals over two years, especially for southern bluefin and albacore, (ii) longitudinal sections are more precise and produce older age estimates than transverse sections for daily-age estimates, (iii) there are considerable differences in these trends between species, likely dependent on longevity, and (iv) parameter estimates and/or conclusions based on meta-analyses using age data derived from different ageing methods are likely confounded with methodological biases. This result demonstrates that greater effort is required to provide consistent, validated methods for routine age determination to support the assessment and management of these valuable populations.

AB - Information on the age of individuals is often required for models assessing the status of stocks. Techniques used to estimate age of tuna have varied across species and agencies, precluding meta-analyses of age and growth. We compared age estimates obtained from commonly used ageing techniques for four important tuna species: bigeye tuna, yellowfin tuna, southern bluefin tuna, and albacore tuna. Estimates of age from counts of annual increments in transverse-sectioned otoliths were generally higher than those from counts of daily increments in transverse and longitudinal sections for all species, particularly for fish older than two years. However, annual counts produced younger estimates, on average, relative to daily counts for bigeye and yellowfin tuna younger than one year. Estimates derived from daily increments in longitudinal and transverse sections were generally similar, although longitudinal sections produced relatively older age estimates for individuals older than two years. A linear or non-linear increase in the magnitude of differences between ageing methods was the best-approximating model in all cases except when comparing daily-increment counts between transverse and longitudinal otolith sections for southern bluefin tuna. These observations are consistent with a narrowing of daily increments with increasing age, resulting in underestimates of age relative to those derived from annual increments. We conclude that (i) daily increments are unsuitable for ageing individuals over two years, especially for southern bluefin and albacore, (ii) longitudinal sections are more precise and produce older age estimates than transverse sections for daily-age estimates, (iii) there are considerable differences in these trends between species, likely dependent on longevity, and (iv) parameter estimates and/or conclusions based on meta-analyses using age data derived from different ageing methods are likely confounded with methodological biases. This result demonstrates that greater effort is required to provide consistent, validated methods for routine age determination to support the assessment and management of these valuable populations.

KW - age estimation

KW - annual increments

KW - daily increments

KW - Pacific Ocean

KW - sectioned otoliths

KW - tuna

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84886413358&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/icesjms/fst093

DO - 10.1093/icesjms/fst093

M3 - Article

VL - 70

SP - 1439

EP - 1450

JO - ICES Journal of Marine Science

JF - ICES Journal of Marine Science

SN - 1054-3139

IS - 7

ER -