Comparison of DNA extraction methods for identification of human remains

Cindy Lim, Mojca Keglovic, Dennis McNevin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

After mass disasters, where the bodies of victims have been degraded, soft tissues are often completely lost, with the result that bones and teeth are all that remain for identification. The aim of this study was to investigate three DNA extraction methods that are currently used with degraded bones in forensic contexts: a silica-based extraction protocol used by the International Commission for Missing Persons (ICMP), a total demineralisation method used by the US Armed Forces DNA Identification Laboratory (AFDIL) and a standard organic DNA extraction method used by the Australian Federal Police (AFP). The methods were compared by real-time PCR quantitation and STR profiling. The silica and organic methods were not significantly different for either of these measures for bone but were both significantly more successful than the demineralisation method. Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was found to significantly improve the DNA yields from real-time PCR and the number of reportable alleles from STR typing, especially when using bone samples
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)117-127
Number of pages11
JournalAustralian Journal of Forensic Sciences
Volume44
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

DNA
Bone and Bones
Silicon Dioxide
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Disaster Victims
Police
Bovine Serum Albumin
Body Remains
Tooth
Alleles

Cite this

Lim, Cindy ; Keglovic, Mojca ; McNevin, Dennis. / Comparison of DNA extraction methods for identification of human remains. In: Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2012 ; Vol. 44, No. 2. pp. 117-127.
@article{9322a3b9c2e84fb9bc3786a49ee84036,
title = "Comparison of DNA extraction methods for identification of human remains",
abstract = "After mass disasters, where the bodies of victims have been degraded, soft tissues are often completely lost, with the result that bones and teeth are all that remain for identification. The aim of this study was to investigate three DNA extraction methods that are currently used with degraded bones in forensic contexts: a silica-based extraction protocol used by the International Commission for Missing Persons (ICMP), a total demineralisation method used by the US Armed Forces DNA Identification Laboratory (AFDIL) and a standard organic DNA extraction method used by the Australian Federal Police (AFP). The methods were compared by real-time PCR quantitation and STR profiling. The silica and organic methods were not significantly different for either of these measures for bone but were both significantly more successful than the demineralisation method. Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was found to significantly improve the DNA yields from real-time PCR and the number of reportable alleles from STR typing, especially when using bone samples",
author = "Cindy Lim and Mojca Keglovic and Dennis McNevin",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1080/00450618.2011.610821",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "117--127",
journal = "Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences",
issn = "0045-0618",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

Comparison of DNA extraction methods for identification of human remains. / Lim, Cindy; Keglovic, Mojca; McNevin, Dennis.

In: Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, Vol. 44, No. 2, 2012, p. 117-127.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of DNA extraction methods for identification of human remains

AU - Lim, Cindy

AU - Keglovic, Mojca

AU - McNevin, Dennis

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - After mass disasters, where the bodies of victims have been degraded, soft tissues are often completely lost, with the result that bones and teeth are all that remain for identification. The aim of this study was to investigate three DNA extraction methods that are currently used with degraded bones in forensic contexts: a silica-based extraction protocol used by the International Commission for Missing Persons (ICMP), a total demineralisation method used by the US Armed Forces DNA Identification Laboratory (AFDIL) and a standard organic DNA extraction method used by the Australian Federal Police (AFP). The methods were compared by real-time PCR quantitation and STR profiling. The silica and organic methods were not significantly different for either of these measures for bone but were both significantly more successful than the demineralisation method. Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was found to significantly improve the DNA yields from real-time PCR and the number of reportable alleles from STR typing, especially when using bone samples

AB - After mass disasters, where the bodies of victims have been degraded, soft tissues are often completely lost, with the result that bones and teeth are all that remain for identification. The aim of this study was to investigate three DNA extraction methods that are currently used with degraded bones in forensic contexts: a silica-based extraction protocol used by the International Commission for Missing Persons (ICMP), a total demineralisation method used by the US Armed Forces DNA Identification Laboratory (AFDIL) and a standard organic DNA extraction method used by the Australian Federal Police (AFP). The methods were compared by real-time PCR quantitation and STR profiling. The silica and organic methods were not significantly different for either of these measures for bone but were both significantly more successful than the demineralisation method. Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was found to significantly improve the DNA yields from real-time PCR and the number of reportable alleles from STR typing, especially when using bone samples

U2 - 10.1080/00450618.2011.610821

DO - 10.1080/00450618.2011.610821

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 117

EP - 127

JO - Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences

JF - Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences

SN - 0045-0618

IS - 2

ER -