Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
University of Canberra Research Portal Home
Search content at University of Canberra Research Portal
Home
Profiles
Research output
Projects
Press/Media
Activities
Research units
Prizes
Student theses
Comparison of DNA extraction methods for identification of human remains
Cindy Lim
, Mojca Keglovic
, Dennis McNevin
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article
›
peer-review
11
Link opens in a new tab
Citations (Scopus)
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of DNA extraction methods for identification of human remains'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Method for Identification
100%
Human Remains Identification
100%
DNA Extraction
100%
Quantitative PCR
66%
Australian Federal Police
33%
US Armed Forces
33%
Soft Tissue
33%
STR Typing
33%
Bovine Serum Albumin
33%
Forensic Setting
33%
Silica
33%
International Commissions
33%
STR Profiling
33%
Silica-based
33%
Demineralization
33%
Missing Persons
33%
Organic Methods
33%
Bone Samples
33%
Total Demineralization
33%
Extraction Protocol
33%
DNA Identification
33%
Mass Disaster
33%
DNA Yield
33%
Medicine and Dentistry
DNA Extraction
100%
Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
66%
Demineralization
66%
Silicon Dioxide
66%
Allele
33%
Bovine Serum Albumin
33%
Immunology and Microbiology
DNA Extraction
100%
Demineralization
66%
Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
66%
Teeth
33%
Soft Tissue
33%
Bovine Serum Albumin
33%
Allele
33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
DNA Extraction
100%
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
66%
Australians
33%
Bovine Serum Albumin
33%
Teeth
33%
Allele
33%
Earth and Planetary Sciences
Real Time
100%
Armed Force
50%
Allele
50%
Teeth
50%
Physics
Allele
100%
Albumin
100%