Comparison of four methods for liberating various aggregate fractions in Vertosols to study their morphology

Damien J. Field, Leigh A. Sullivan, Stephen R. Cattle, Anthony J. Koppi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Topsoil samples from 3 Vertosols located at Narrabri, Warren, and Dalby were treated with 4 aggregate liberation methods to determine their suitability for analysis by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). In addition to the ability of each method to liberate aggregates for assessment, the potential for consequent morphological deformation was also considered. It was found that the aggregate slaking in water and modified wet sieving methods were suitable for liberating aggregates >100 μm in diameter, whereas the ultrasonic agitation method readily liberated aggregates <50 μm in diameter. End-over-end shaking is not recommended for preparing aggregates for SEM as the method appeared to cause morphological deformation of the liberated aggregates. The systematic use of the 4 aggregate liberating methods, assuming an increase in the intensity of the energy supplied, enabled the partitioning of the aggregates of these Vertosols into pragmatic aggregate size fractions defining a hierarchy, i.e. >250, 100-250, 20-100, 2-20, and <2 μm in diameter.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)29-37
Number of pages9
JournalAustralian Journal of Soil Research
Volume42
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

sieving
agitation
slaking
methodology
topsoil
ultrasonics
scanning electron microscopy
Ultrasonics
comparison
method
Scanning electron microscopy
Water
water
sampling
analysis

Cite this

@article{d4cae6b6705f416d966da4f3f7eb427a,
title = "Comparison of four methods for liberating various aggregate fractions in Vertosols to study their morphology",
abstract = "Topsoil samples from 3 Vertosols located at Narrabri, Warren, and Dalby were treated with 4 aggregate liberation methods to determine their suitability for analysis by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). In addition to the ability of each method to liberate aggregates for assessment, the potential for consequent morphological deformation was also considered. It was found that the aggregate slaking in water and modified wet sieving methods were suitable for liberating aggregates >100 μm in diameter, whereas the ultrasonic agitation method readily liberated aggregates <50 μm in diameter. End-over-end shaking is not recommended for preparing aggregates for SEM as the method appeared to cause morphological deformation of the liberated aggregates. The systematic use of the 4 aggregate liberating methods, assuming an increase in the intensity of the energy supplied, enabled the partitioning of the aggregates of these Vertosols into pragmatic aggregate size fractions defining a hierarchy, i.e. >250, 100-250, 20-100, 2-20, and <2 μm in diameter.",
keywords = "Aggregate hierarchy, Microaggregate, Scanning electron microscopy, Soil micromorphology",
author = "Field, {Damien J.} and Sullivan, {Leigh A.} and Cattle, {Stephen R.} and Koppi, {Anthony J.}",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.1071/SR03057",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "29--37",
journal = "Australian Journal of Soil Research",
issn = "0004-9573",
publisher = "CSIRO",
number = "1",

}

Comparison of four methods for liberating various aggregate fractions in Vertosols to study their morphology. / Field, Damien J.; Sullivan, Leigh A.; Cattle, Stephen R.; Koppi, Anthony J.

In: Australian Journal of Soil Research, Vol. 42, No. 1, 2004, p. 29-37.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of four methods for liberating various aggregate fractions in Vertosols to study their morphology

AU - Field, Damien J.

AU - Sullivan, Leigh A.

AU - Cattle, Stephen R.

AU - Koppi, Anthony J.

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - Topsoil samples from 3 Vertosols located at Narrabri, Warren, and Dalby were treated with 4 aggregate liberation methods to determine their suitability for analysis by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). In addition to the ability of each method to liberate aggregates for assessment, the potential for consequent morphological deformation was also considered. It was found that the aggregate slaking in water and modified wet sieving methods were suitable for liberating aggregates >100 μm in diameter, whereas the ultrasonic agitation method readily liberated aggregates <50 μm in diameter. End-over-end shaking is not recommended for preparing aggregates for SEM as the method appeared to cause morphological deformation of the liberated aggregates. The systematic use of the 4 aggregate liberating methods, assuming an increase in the intensity of the energy supplied, enabled the partitioning of the aggregates of these Vertosols into pragmatic aggregate size fractions defining a hierarchy, i.e. >250, 100-250, 20-100, 2-20, and <2 μm in diameter.

AB - Topsoil samples from 3 Vertosols located at Narrabri, Warren, and Dalby were treated with 4 aggregate liberation methods to determine their suitability for analysis by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). In addition to the ability of each method to liberate aggregates for assessment, the potential for consequent morphological deformation was also considered. It was found that the aggregate slaking in water and modified wet sieving methods were suitable for liberating aggregates >100 μm in diameter, whereas the ultrasonic agitation method readily liberated aggregates <50 μm in diameter. End-over-end shaking is not recommended for preparing aggregates for SEM as the method appeared to cause morphological deformation of the liberated aggregates. The systematic use of the 4 aggregate liberating methods, assuming an increase in the intensity of the energy supplied, enabled the partitioning of the aggregates of these Vertosols into pragmatic aggregate size fractions defining a hierarchy, i.e. >250, 100-250, 20-100, 2-20, and <2 μm in diameter.

KW - Aggregate hierarchy

KW - Microaggregate

KW - Scanning electron microscopy

KW - Soil micromorphology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1542321153&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1071/SR03057

DO - 10.1071/SR03057

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 29

EP - 37

JO - Australian Journal of Soil Research

JF - Australian Journal of Soil Research

SN - 0004-9573

IS - 1

ER -