TY - CHAP
T1 - Comparison of synthetic CT generation algorithms for MRI-only radiation planning in the pelvic region
AU - Arabi, Hossein
AU - Dowling, Jason A.
AU - Burgos, Ninon
AU - Han, Xiao
AU - Greer, Peter B.
AU - Koutsouvelis, Nikolaos
AU - Zaidi, Habib
N1 - Publisher Copyright:© 2018 IEEE.
PY - 2018/11
Y1 - 2018/11
N2 - Accurate radiation dose calculation is a major challenge in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-only radiation therapy (RT) treatment planning as the required electron density map is not readily provided by this modality. In this work, a number of state-of-the-art synthetic-CT (sCT) generation methods, exhibited promising results in the literature, were evaluated based on common quantitative metrics and patients dataset. This includes four atlas-based approaches, specifically median of atlas images (A-Median) [1], atlas-based voxel-wise weighting (A-VW) [2], bone enhanced atlas-based voxel-wise weighting (A-Bone) [3], iterative atlas-based voxel-wise weighting (A-Iter) [4], and a method based on deep learning convolutional neural network (DL-CNN) [5]. Automatic organ delineation was performed for bladder, rectum and bone. Overall, A-VW, A-Bone, A-Iter and A-VWexhibited comparable performance while DL-CNN showed slightly better segmentation performance resulting in Dice metrics of 0.93, 0.90, and 0.93, respectively. The dosimetric evaluation demonstrated that A-Median, A-VW, A-Bone, A-Iter and DL-CNN resulted in comparable mean dose errors within organs at risk and target volumes showing less than 1% dose difference against the CT-based RT planning. The two-dimensional gamma analysis performed at 1%/1 mm criterion demonstrated comparable pass rates of 94.99±5.15%, 94.59±5.65%, 93.68±5.53% and 93.10±5.99% for A-Bone, DL-CNN, A-Median and A-Iter, respectively. Whereas A-VW and water-only resulted in pass rates of 86.91±13.50% and 80.77±12.10%, respectively. DL-CNN and advanced atlas-based approaches showed promising dosimetric and segmentation accuracy (DL-CNN is slightly better) suggesting that these methods are able to resolve the challenge of synthetic-CT generation from MR images with clinically acceptable errors.
AB - Accurate radiation dose calculation is a major challenge in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-only radiation therapy (RT) treatment planning as the required electron density map is not readily provided by this modality. In this work, a number of state-of-the-art synthetic-CT (sCT) generation methods, exhibited promising results in the literature, were evaluated based on common quantitative metrics and patients dataset. This includes four atlas-based approaches, specifically median of atlas images (A-Median) [1], atlas-based voxel-wise weighting (A-VW) [2], bone enhanced atlas-based voxel-wise weighting (A-Bone) [3], iterative atlas-based voxel-wise weighting (A-Iter) [4], and a method based on deep learning convolutional neural network (DL-CNN) [5]. Automatic organ delineation was performed for bladder, rectum and bone. Overall, A-VW, A-Bone, A-Iter and A-VWexhibited comparable performance while DL-CNN showed slightly better segmentation performance resulting in Dice metrics of 0.93, 0.90, and 0.93, respectively. The dosimetric evaluation demonstrated that A-Median, A-VW, A-Bone, A-Iter and DL-CNN resulted in comparable mean dose errors within organs at risk and target volumes showing less than 1% dose difference against the CT-based RT planning. The two-dimensional gamma analysis performed at 1%/1 mm criterion demonstrated comparable pass rates of 94.99±5.15%, 94.59±5.65%, 93.68±5.53% and 93.10±5.99% for A-Bone, DL-CNN, A-Median and A-Iter, respectively. Whereas A-VW and water-only resulted in pass rates of 86.91±13.50% and 80.77±12.10%, respectively. DL-CNN and advanced atlas-based approaches showed promising dosimetric and segmentation accuracy (DL-CNN is slightly better) suggesting that these methods are able to resolve the challenge of synthetic-CT generation from MR images with clinically acceptable errors.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073101995&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://nssmic.org/2018/
U2 - 10.1109/NSSMIC.2018.8824321
DO - 10.1109/NSSMIC.2018.8824321
M3 - Other chapter contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85073101995
SN - 9781538684955
T3 - 2018 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference, NSS/MIC 2018 - Proceedings
SP - 1
EP - 3
BT - 2018 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference, NSS/MIC 2018 - Proceedings
A2 - Rozenfeld, Anatoly
A2 - Engels, Ralf
PB - IEEE, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
CY - United States
T2 - 2018 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference, NSS/MIC 2018
Y2 - 10 November 2018 through 17 November 2018
ER -