Comparison of the abilities of WEPP and the USLE-M to predict event soil loss on steep loessal slopes in China

P. I.A. Kinnell, Jianxun Wang, Fenli Zheng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The need to estimate event soil loss better than the USLE and the RUSLE has led to the development of WEPP and the USLE-M, a modification of the USLE that estimates event soil loss for bare fallow runoff and soil loss plots in the USLE database better than the USLE/RUSLE when runoff is known or predicted well. Although the erosivity indices in the USLE-M and the USLE/RUSLE focus on raindrop driven erosion, the calibration of the erodibility index on plots where rilling occurs enables the USLE-M and the USLE/RUSLE to be applied on areas where sheet and rill erosion occur. This paper presents results from the application of both WEPP and the USLE-M to modelling event soil loss from 6 runoff and soil plots at the Ansai Research Station of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences (36°56′N, 109°16′E) produced from steep slopes (8.7%–53.2%) where rills frequently developed under natural rainfall during 1985–1992. WEPP was calibrated to minimize the mean squared error (MSE) between measured runoff and predicted runoff for the events where WEPP predicted runoff and soil loss to occur. The number of events where WEPP predicted runoff and soil loss to occur varied from 25% to 41% of events that actually produced soil loss. In the comparison with WEPP, the USLE-M erodibility factor was calibrated by dividing the total observed soil loss where WEPP predicted runoff and soil loss to occur by the total of the USLE-M erosivity factor for the same set of events. Consequently, the total amount of soil lost estimated for these events by both models were the same. This enabled the ability of the models to predict event soil loses to be examined using the Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency index. In every case, the efficiency index values for the USLE-M were higher than for WEPP irrespective of whether the values of USLE-M erosivity index were determined using observed or WEPP predicted runoff. As a model of rainfall erosion, focusing on a process based approach has not resulted in WEPP performing as well as or better than the USLE-M on the steep bare fallow plots of loessal soil at the Ansai Research Station in China.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)99-106
Number of pages8
JournalCatena
Volume171
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2018

Fingerprint

Universal Soil Loss Equation
runoff
soil
Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation
erosivity
erodibility
loss
comparison
erosion
fallow
rainfall
rill
raindrop
soil conservation

Cite this

Kinnell, P. I.A. ; Wang, Jianxun ; Zheng, Fenli. / Comparison of the abilities of WEPP and the USLE-M to predict event soil loss on steep loessal slopes in China. In: Catena. 2018 ; Vol. 171. pp. 99-106.
@article{e4c93bb2dde44372a26021b87e94a57a,
title = "Comparison of the abilities of WEPP and the USLE-M to predict event soil loss on steep loessal slopes in China",
abstract = "The need to estimate event soil loss better than the USLE and the RUSLE has led to the development of WEPP and the USLE-M, a modification of the USLE that estimates event soil loss for bare fallow runoff and soil loss plots in the USLE database better than the USLE/RUSLE when runoff is known or predicted well. Although the erosivity indices in the USLE-M and the USLE/RUSLE focus on raindrop driven erosion, the calibration of the erodibility index on plots where rilling occurs enables the USLE-M and the USLE/RUSLE to be applied on areas where sheet and rill erosion occur. This paper presents results from the application of both WEPP and the USLE-M to modelling event soil loss from 6 runoff and soil plots at the Ansai Research Station of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences (36°56′N, 109°16′E) produced from steep slopes (8.7{\%}–53.2{\%}) where rills frequently developed under natural rainfall during 1985–1992. WEPP was calibrated to minimize the mean squared error (MSE) between measured runoff and predicted runoff for the events where WEPP predicted runoff and soil loss to occur. The number of events where WEPP predicted runoff and soil loss to occur varied from 25{\%} to 41{\%} of events that actually produced soil loss. In the comparison with WEPP, the USLE-M erodibility factor was calibrated by dividing the total observed soil loss where WEPP predicted runoff and soil loss to occur by the total of the USLE-M erosivity factor for the same set of events. Consequently, the total amount of soil lost estimated for these events by both models were the same. This enabled the ability of the models to predict event soil loses to be examined using the Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency index. In every case, the efficiency index values for the USLE-M were higher than for WEPP irrespective of whether the values of USLE-M erosivity index were determined using observed or WEPP predicted runoff. As a model of rainfall erosion, focusing on a process based approach has not resulted in WEPP performing as well as or better than the USLE-M on the steep bare fallow plots of loessal soil at the Ansai Research Station in China.",
keywords = "Model calibration, Rainfall erosion, Rill erosion, Runoff",
author = "Kinnell, {P. I.A.} and Jianxun Wang and Fenli Zheng",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.catena.2018.07.007",
language = "English",
volume = "171",
pages = "99--106",
journal = "Catena",
issn = "0341-8162",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Comparison of the abilities of WEPP and the USLE-M to predict event soil loss on steep loessal slopes in China. / Kinnell, P. I.A.; Wang, Jianxun; Zheng, Fenli.

In: Catena, Vol. 171, 01.12.2018, p. 99-106.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of the abilities of WEPP and the USLE-M to predict event soil loss on steep loessal slopes in China

AU - Kinnell, P. I.A.

AU - Wang, Jianxun

AU - Zheng, Fenli

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - The need to estimate event soil loss better than the USLE and the RUSLE has led to the development of WEPP and the USLE-M, a modification of the USLE that estimates event soil loss for bare fallow runoff and soil loss plots in the USLE database better than the USLE/RUSLE when runoff is known or predicted well. Although the erosivity indices in the USLE-M and the USLE/RUSLE focus on raindrop driven erosion, the calibration of the erodibility index on plots where rilling occurs enables the USLE-M and the USLE/RUSLE to be applied on areas where sheet and rill erosion occur. This paper presents results from the application of both WEPP and the USLE-M to modelling event soil loss from 6 runoff and soil plots at the Ansai Research Station of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences (36°56′N, 109°16′E) produced from steep slopes (8.7%–53.2%) where rills frequently developed under natural rainfall during 1985–1992. WEPP was calibrated to minimize the mean squared error (MSE) between measured runoff and predicted runoff for the events where WEPP predicted runoff and soil loss to occur. The number of events where WEPP predicted runoff and soil loss to occur varied from 25% to 41% of events that actually produced soil loss. In the comparison with WEPP, the USLE-M erodibility factor was calibrated by dividing the total observed soil loss where WEPP predicted runoff and soil loss to occur by the total of the USLE-M erosivity factor for the same set of events. Consequently, the total amount of soil lost estimated for these events by both models were the same. This enabled the ability of the models to predict event soil loses to be examined using the Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency index. In every case, the efficiency index values for the USLE-M were higher than for WEPP irrespective of whether the values of USLE-M erosivity index were determined using observed or WEPP predicted runoff. As a model of rainfall erosion, focusing on a process based approach has not resulted in WEPP performing as well as or better than the USLE-M on the steep bare fallow plots of loessal soil at the Ansai Research Station in China.

AB - The need to estimate event soil loss better than the USLE and the RUSLE has led to the development of WEPP and the USLE-M, a modification of the USLE that estimates event soil loss for bare fallow runoff and soil loss plots in the USLE database better than the USLE/RUSLE when runoff is known or predicted well. Although the erosivity indices in the USLE-M and the USLE/RUSLE focus on raindrop driven erosion, the calibration of the erodibility index on plots where rilling occurs enables the USLE-M and the USLE/RUSLE to be applied on areas where sheet and rill erosion occur. This paper presents results from the application of both WEPP and the USLE-M to modelling event soil loss from 6 runoff and soil plots at the Ansai Research Station of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences (36°56′N, 109°16′E) produced from steep slopes (8.7%–53.2%) where rills frequently developed under natural rainfall during 1985–1992. WEPP was calibrated to minimize the mean squared error (MSE) between measured runoff and predicted runoff for the events where WEPP predicted runoff and soil loss to occur. The number of events where WEPP predicted runoff and soil loss to occur varied from 25% to 41% of events that actually produced soil loss. In the comparison with WEPP, the USLE-M erodibility factor was calibrated by dividing the total observed soil loss where WEPP predicted runoff and soil loss to occur by the total of the USLE-M erosivity factor for the same set of events. Consequently, the total amount of soil lost estimated for these events by both models were the same. This enabled the ability of the models to predict event soil loses to be examined using the Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency index. In every case, the efficiency index values for the USLE-M were higher than for WEPP irrespective of whether the values of USLE-M erosivity index were determined using observed or WEPP predicted runoff. As a model of rainfall erosion, focusing on a process based approach has not resulted in WEPP performing as well as or better than the USLE-M on the steep bare fallow plots of loessal soil at the Ansai Research Station in China.

KW - Model calibration

KW - Rainfall erosion

KW - Rill erosion

KW - Runoff

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049656329&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.catena.2018.07.007

DO - 10.1016/j.catena.2018.07.007

M3 - Article

VL - 171

SP - 99

EP - 106

JO - Catena

JF - Catena

SN - 0341-8162

ER -