Comparison of three current sets of electrocardiographic interpretation criteria for use in screening athletes

Nathan R. Riding, Nabeel Sheikh, Carmen Adamuz, Victoria Watt, Abdulaziz Farooq, Gregory P. Whyte, Keith P. George, Jonathan A. Drezner, Sanjay Sharma, Mathew G. Wilson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

57 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background An increasing number of sporting bodies report unacceptably high levels of false-positive ECGs when undertaking pre-participation cardiac screening. To address this issue, modified ECG interpretation criteria have become available for use within athletes. Objective This study assessed the accuracy of the new 2014 'Refined Criteria' against the 2013 Seattle Criteria and the 2010 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recommendations in a cohort of Arabic, black and Caucasian athletes. Methods 2491 male athletes (1367 Arabic, 748 black and 376 Caucasian) undertook pre-participation screening including a 12-lead ECG, with further investigation(s) upon indication. Results Ten athletes (0.4%) were identified with cardiac pathology; seven with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM; five black and two Arabic) and three Arabs with Wolff-Parkinson -White syndrome (WPW). All three ECG criteria were 100% sensitive identifying all cases of HCM and WPW. The 2014 Refined Criteria reduced (p<0.0001) the prevalence of an abnormal ECG to 5.3% vs 11.6% (Seattle Criteria) and 22.3% (2010 ESC recommendations). The 2014 Refined Criteria significantly (p<0.0001) improved specificity (94.0%) across all ethnicities compared with the Seattle Criteria (87.5%) and ESC recommendations (76.6%). Black athletes continue to present a higher prevalence (p<0.0001) of abnormal ECGs compared with Arabic and Caucasian athletes (10% vs 3.6% and 2.1%). Conclusions The 2014 Re fined Criteria for athlete ECG interpretation outperformed both the 2013 Seattle Criteria and the 2010 ESC recommendations by significantly reducing the number of false-positive ECGs in Arabic, black and Caucasian athletes while maintaining 100% sensitivity for serious cardiac pathologies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)384-390
Number of pages7
JournalHeart
Volume101
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Dec 2014
Externally publishedYes

    Fingerprint

Cite this

Riding, N. R., Sheikh, N., Adamuz, C., Watt, V., Farooq, A., Whyte, G. P., ... Wilson, M. G. (2014). Comparison of three current sets of electrocardiographic interpretation criteria for use in screening athletes. Heart, 101(5), 384-390. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306437