Conceptions and Misconceptions

Social representations of medically assisted reproduction

Iain Walker, Pia Broderick, Helen Correia

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookChapter

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Infertility and its treatment is a social issue in most Western countries. As many as one couple in seven will have difficulty becoming pregnant when they want to. Medical interventions to assist reproduction have developed rapidly over the last four decades so that it is now possible for many couples to become pregnant when once they would have remained childless. Many such interventions rely on the use of donated sperm, eggs, or embryos. Along with the rapid development of new medical technologies, there is now a sizable industry of counselors working in the area (Burns 1993; Daniels 1993), and legislation and policy to control the fertility industry exist in many states and countries, including Australia (Broderick 2005a, 2005b). Academics have turned their attentions to studies of the stresses experienced by people undergoing medically assisted reproductive technology (MART) procedures (for example, Edelman, Connolly, and Bartlett 1994; Wasser 1994), of the wisdom of telling a child of the circumstances of its conception (for example, Broderick and Walker 1995; Daniels and Taylor 1993; Savage 1995), and of the gender politics involved (for example, Abbey, Andrews, and Halman 1991; Haimes 1993). MART technologies, perhaps especially when they involve donated gametes and embryos, raise many psychological, social, legal, ethical, and political dilemmas. Infertility and the technologies used to overcome it are public issues as well as private concerns
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSocial Representations and Identity
Subtitle of host publicationContent, Process, and Power
EditorsGail Moloney, Iain Walker
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Chapter9
Pages157-176
Number of pages20
ISBN (Electronic)9780230609181
ISBN (Print)9781349538294
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Reproduction
Assisted Reproductive Techniques
Technology
Infertility
embryo
Industry
Embryonic Structures
Politics
Contraception
Burns
Legislation
Germ Cells
Eggs
medical technology
Spermatozoa
industry
social issue
counselor
Psychology
wisdom

Cite this

Walker, I., Broderick, P., & Correia, H. (2007). Conceptions and Misconceptions: Social representations of medically assisted reproduction. In G. Moloney, & I. Walker (Eds.), Social Representations and Identity: Content, Process, and Power (pp. 157-176). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230609181_9
Walker, Iain ; Broderick, Pia ; Correia, Helen. / Conceptions and Misconceptions : Social representations of medically assisted reproduction. Social Representations and Identity: Content, Process, and Power. editor / Gail Moloney ; Iain Walker. Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. pp. 157-176
@inbook{1930f5786159465498ce884cbe25daf3,
title = "Conceptions and Misconceptions: Social representations of medically assisted reproduction",
abstract = "Infertility and its treatment is a social issue in most Western countries. As many as one couple in seven will have difficulty becoming pregnant when they want to. Medical interventions to assist reproduction have developed rapidly over the last four decades so that it is now possible for many couples to become pregnant when once they would have remained childless. Many such interventions rely on the use of donated sperm, eggs, or embryos. Along with the rapid development of new medical technologies, there is now a sizable industry of counselors working in the area (Burns 1993; Daniels 1993), and legislation and policy to control the fertility industry exist in many states and countries, including Australia (Broderick 2005a, 2005b). Academics have turned their attentions to studies of the stresses experienced by people undergoing medically assisted reproductive technology (MART) procedures (for example, Edelman, Connolly, and Bartlett 1994; Wasser 1994), of the wisdom of telling a child of the circumstances of its conception (for example, Broderick and Walker 1995; Daniels and Taylor 1993; Savage 1995), and of the gender politics involved (for example, Abbey, Andrews, and Halman 1991; Haimes 1993). MART technologies, perhaps especially when they involve donated gametes and embryos, raise many psychological, social, legal, ethical, and political dilemmas. Infertility and the technologies used to overcome it are public issues as well as private concerns",
author = "Iain Walker and Pia Broderick and Helen Correia",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1057/9780230609181_9",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781349538294",
pages = "157--176",
editor = "Gail Moloney and Iain Walker",
booktitle = "Social Representations and Identity",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Walker, I, Broderick, P & Correia, H 2007, Conceptions and Misconceptions: Social representations of medically assisted reproduction. in G Moloney & I Walker (eds), Social Representations and Identity: Content, Process, and Power. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 157-176. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230609181_9

Conceptions and Misconceptions : Social representations of medically assisted reproduction. / Walker, Iain; Broderick, Pia; Correia, Helen.

Social Representations and Identity: Content, Process, and Power. ed. / Gail Moloney; Iain Walker. Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. p. 157-176.

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Conceptions and Misconceptions

T2 - Social representations of medically assisted reproduction

AU - Walker, Iain

AU - Broderick, Pia

AU - Correia, Helen

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - Infertility and its treatment is a social issue in most Western countries. As many as one couple in seven will have difficulty becoming pregnant when they want to. Medical interventions to assist reproduction have developed rapidly over the last four decades so that it is now possible for many couples to become pregnant when once they would have remained childless. Many such interventions rely on the use of donated sperm, eggs, or embryos. Along with the rapid development of new medical technologies, there is now a sizable industry of counselors working in the area (Burns 1993; Daniels 1993), and legislation and policy to control the fertility industry exist in many states and countries, including Australia (Broderick 2005a, 2005b). Academics have turned their attentions to studies of the stresses experienced by people undergoing medically assisted reproductive technology (MART) procedures (for example, Edelman, Connolly, and Bartlett 1994; Wasser 1994), of the wisdom of telling a child of the circumstances of its conception (for example, Broderick and Walker 1995; Daniels and Taylor 1993; Savage 1995), and of the gender politics involved (for example, Abbey, Andrews, and Halman 1991; Haimes 1993). MART technologies, perhaps especially when they involve donated gametes and embryos, raise many psychological, social, legal, ethical, and political dilemmas. Infertility and the technologies used to overcome it are public issues as well as private concerns

AB - Infertility and its treatment is a social issue in most Western countries. As many as one couple in seven will have difficulty becoming pregnant when they want to. Medical interventions to assist reproduction have developed rapidly over the last four decades so that it is now possible for many couples to become pregnant when once they would have remained childless. Many such interventions rely on the use of donated sperm, eggs, or embryos. Along with the rapid development of new medical technologies, there is now a sizable industry of counselors working in the area (Burns 1993; Daniels 1993), and legislation and policy to control the fertility industry exist in many states and countries, including Australia (Broderick 2005a, 2005b). Academics have turned their attentions to studies of the stresses experienced by people undergoing medically assisted reproductive technology (MART) procedures (for example, Edelman, Connolly, and Bartlett 1994; Wasser 1994), of the wisdom of telling a child of the circumstances of its conception (for example, Broderick and Walker 1995; Daniels and Taylor 1993; Savage 1995), and of the gender politics involved (for example, Abbey, Andrews, and Halman 1991; Haimes 1993). MART technologies, perhaps especially when they involve donated gametes and embryos, raise many psychological, social, legal, ethical, and political dilemmas. Infertility and the technologies used to overcome it are public issues as well as private concerns

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014146048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1057/9780230609181_9

DO - 10.1057/9780230609181_9

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781349538294

SP - 157

EP - 176

BT - Social Representations and Identity

A2 - Moloney, Gail

A2 - Walker, Iain

PB - Palgrave Macmillan

ER -

Walker I, Broderick P, Correia H. Conceptions and Misconceptions: Social representations of medically assisted reproduction. In Moloney G, Walker I, editors, Social Representations and Identity: Content, Process, and Power. Palgrave Macmillan. 2007. p. 157-176 https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230609181_9