Abstract
Chapter 2 offers a critical review of three systemic accounts of deliberative democracy, focusing on their assumptions about democratic connectivity. It draws attention to the ‘communicative miracles’ that lie at the heart of each deliberative system account—‘miracles’ that are out of step with contemporary disconnects experienced in the representative process, in the public sphere itself, and along the policy process. The chapter shows that these ‘communicative miracles’ are not only theoretical blind spots, but also practical obstacles hindering deliberative democracy from speaking more directly to, and serving as a richer resource for, democratic renewal. The chapter calls for a more empirically informed account of connectivity in contemporary public deliberation, one that is grounded in the work and agency of those involved in making or strengthening connectivity. It argues that an abductive research approach that employs interpretive methods is particularly well suited for developing such empirically informed accounts of connectivity. The chapter concludes by making the case for the close study of contemporary political practices, especially focused on how diverse actors are experiencing democratic disconnects, and what actions they are taking to mend them.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Mending Democracy |
Subtitle of host publication | Democratic Repair in Disconnected Times |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
Chapter | 2 |
Pages | 19-35 |
Number of pages | 16 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9780191878954 |
ISBN (Print) | 9780198843054 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2020 |