Consensus weightings of evidence for inferring breeding success in broad-scale bird studies

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    24 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Ideally, one seeks to assess landscapes for their capacity to sustain viable populations of all local species. This applies to much-affected landscapes and also to restored landscapes. In most circumstances, it is prohibitive to conduct full demographic and dispersal studies of many species of birds (or other taxa) at many sites, which typifies many conservation problems. Here I report upon outcomes of elicitations of views of expert ornithologists on how they would weight a range of breeding behaviours and evidence for success of breeding in remnants or replanted sites. Such consensus results potentially could be used by workers to assess how alternative conservation and management actions affect breeding success. While the data are tailored specifically to Australian woodland birds, the method can be adapted easily for other taxa and habitats. I also summarize some of the experts' main caveats on weightings.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)479-484
    Number of pages6
    JournalAustral Ecology
    Volume32
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2007

    Fingerprint

    reproductive success
    bird
    birds
    breeding
    expert opinion
    reproductive behavior
    woodlands
    woodland
    demographic statistics
    habitat
    habitats
    methodology
    method

    Cite this

    @article{4c00849a148c4ffbacd4c2c35b10650e,
    title = "Consensus weightings of evidence for inferring breeding success in broad-scale bird studies",
    abstract = "Ideally, one seeks to assess landscapes for their capacity to sustain viable populations of all local species. This applies to much-affected landscapes and also to restored landscapes. In most circumstances, it is prohibitive to conduct full demographic and dispersal studies of many species of birds (or other taxa) at many sites, which typifies many conservation problems. Here I report upon outcomes of elicitations of views of expert ornithologists on how they would weight a range of breeding behaviours and evidence for success of breeding in remnants or replanted sites. Such consensus results potentially could be used by workers to assess how alternative conservation and management actions affect breeding success. While the data are tailored specifically to Australian woodland birds, the method can be adapted easily for other taxa and habitats. I also summarize some of the experts' main caveats on weightings.",
    author = "{Mac Nally}, R.",
    note = "Cited By :21 Export Date: 6 June 2017",
    year = "2007",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1442-9993.2007.01714.x",
    language = "English",
    volume = "32",
    pages = "479--484",
    journal = "Austral Ecology",
    issn = "1442-9985",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "5",

    }

    Consensus weightings of evidence for inferring breeding success in broad-scale bird studies. / Mac Nally, R.

    In: Austral Ecology, Vol. 32, No. 5, 2007, p. 479-484.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Consensus weightings of evidence for inferring breeding success in broad-scale bird studies

    AU - Mac Nally, R.

    N1 - Cited By :21 Export Date: 6 June 2017

    PY - 2007

    Y1 - 2007

    N2 - Ideally, one seeks to assess landscapes for their capacity to sustain viable populations of all local species. This applies to much-affected landscapes and also to restored landscapes. In most circumstances, it is prohibitive to conduct full demographic and dispersal studies of many species of birds (or other taxa) at many sites, which typifies many conservation problems. Here I report upon outcomes of elicitations of views of expert ornithologists on how they would weight a range of breeding behaviours and evidence for success of breeding in remnants or replanted sites. Such consensus results potentially could be used by workers to assess how alternative conservation and management actions affect breeding success. While the data are tailored specifically to Australian woodland birds, the method can be adapted easily for other taxa and habitats. I also summarize some of the experts' main caveats on weightings.

    AB - Ideally, one seeks to assess landscapes for their capacity to sustain viable populations of all local species. This applies to much-affected landscapes and also to restored landscapes. In most circumstances, it is prohibitive to conduct full demographic and dispersal studies of many species of birds (or other taxa) at many sites, which typifies many conservation problems. Here I report upon outcomes of elicitations of views of expert ornithologists on how they would weight a range of breeding behaviours and evidence for success of breeding in remnants or replanted sites. Such consensus results potentially could be used by workers to assess how alternative conservation and management actions affect breeding success. While the data are tailored specifically to Australian woodland birds, the method can be adapted easily for other taxa and habitats. I also summarize some of the experts' main caveats on weightings.

    U2 - 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2007.01714.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2007.01714.x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 32

    SP - 479

    EP - 484

    JO - Austral Ecology

    JF - Austral Ecology

    SN - 1442-9985

    IS - 5

    ER -