Control group changes in objectively measured physical activity in primary care: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Nicole Freene, Rachel Davey, Steven M. McPhail

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: There is some evidence that simply measuring physical activity alone can increase self-reported physical activity behaviour. Objective measures of physical activity in intervention studies have increased substantially over the last decade. Yet, there is no synthesised evidence of observed changes in the control group physical activity in trials that have used objective physical activity measurement approaches. Understanding factors associated with control group increases (or decreases) in physical activity may have implications for planning physical activity research and in clinical settings where objective measures of physical activity may be used. The aim of this systematic review is to describe changes in objectively measured physical activity that have occurred within control groups in primary care physical activity intervention studies and, if possible, identify factors that are potentially associated with these changes. Methods: The PRISMA-P reporting guidelines for systematic review protocols will be followed. Five electronic databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscuss, PsychINFO, CINAHL) will be searched to identify physical activity controlled (randomised, cluster, quasi-experimental) studies conducted with adults in primary care. Search terms will be based on previous systematic reviews, and only peer-reviewed articles published in English will be considered. The main outcome measure is the change in objectively measured physical activity within the control group. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool and the Risk Of Bias in Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions tool. Meta-analyses will be conducted where possible among studies with sufficient homogeneity. Discussion: This systematic review and meta-analysis will determine the extent to which physical activity measurement alone is associated with changes in objectively measured physical activity levels in control groups in primary care. Findings from this study will inform future physical activity intervention research and practice. If measuring physical activity alone is associated with increases in physical activity levels that may be considered beneficial for health, this could indicate that measurement alone may be a low cost, efficient and effective method to increase a proprotion of the population's physical activity levels. 

LanguageEnglish
Article number144
Pages1-6
Number of pages6
JournalSystematic Reviews
Volume8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Jun 2019

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
Primary Health Care
Control Groups
Peer Review
Research
PubMed
MEDLINE
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Databases
Guidelines
Costs and Cost Analysis
Health
Population

Cite this

@article{467169b75d2249f9af68ca0006ff4457,
title = "Control group changes in objectively measured physical activity in primary care: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis",
abstract = "Background: There is some evidence that simply measuring physical activity alone can increase self-reported physical activity behaviour. Objective measures of physical activity in intervention studies have increased substantially over the last decade. Yet, there is no synthesised evidence of observed changes in the control group physical activity in trials that have used objective physical activity measurement approaches. Understanding factors associated with control group increases (or decreases) in physical activity may have implications for planning physical activity research and in clinical settings where objective measures of physical activity may be used. The aim of this systematic review is to describe changes in objectively measured physical activity that have occurred within control groups in primary care physical activity intervention studies and, if possible, identify factors that are potentially associated with these changes. Methods: The PRISMA-P reporting guidelines for systematic review protocols will be followed. Five electronic databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscuss, PsychINFO, CINAHL) will be searched to identify physical activity controlled (randomised, cluster, quasi-experimental) studies conducted with adults in primary care. Search terms will be based on previous systematic reviews, and only peer-reviewed articles published in English will be considered. The main outcome measure is the change in objectively measured physical activity within the control group. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool and the Risk Of Bias in Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions tool. Meta-analyses will be conducted where possible among studies with sufficient homogeneity. Discussion: This systematic review and meta-analysis will determine the extent to which physical activity measurement alone is associated with changes in objectively measured physical activity levels in control groups in primary care. Findings from this study will inform future physical activity intervention research and practice. If measuring physical activity alone is associated with increases in physical activity levels that may be considered beneficial for health, this could indicate that measurement alone may be a low cost, efficient and effective method to increase a proprotion of the population's physical activity levels. ",
keywords = "Accelerometry, Control, Measurement, Measurement reactivity, Pedometer, Question-behaviour effect",
author = "Nicole Freene and Rachel Davey and McPhail, {Steven M.}",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1186/s13643-019-1060-2",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "1--6",
journal = "Systematic Reviews",
issn = "2046-4053",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Control group changes in objectively measured physical activity in primary care

T2 - Systematic Reviews

AU - Freene, Nicole

AU - Davey, Rachel

AU - McPhail, Steven M.

PY - 2019/6/18

Y1 - 2019/6/18

N2 - Background: There is some evidence that simply measuring physical activity alone can increase self-reported physical activity behaviour. Objective measures of physical activity in intervention studies have increased substantially over the last decade. Yet, there is no synthesised evidence of observed changes in the control group physical activity in trials that have used objective physical activity measurement approaches. Understanding factors associated with control group increases (or decreases) in physical activity may have implications for planning physical activity research and in clinical settings where objective measures of physical activity may be used. The aim of this systematic review is to describe changes in objectively measured physical activity that have occurred within control groups in primary care physical activity intervention studies and, if possible, identify factors that are potentially associated with these changes. Methods: The PRISMA-P reporting guidelines for systematic review protocols will be followed. Five electronic databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscuss, PsychINFO, CINAHL) will be searched to identify physical activity controlled (randomised, cluster, quasi-experimental) studies conducted with adults in primary care. Search terms will be based on previous systematic reviews, and only peer-reviewed articles published in English will be considered. The main outcome measure is the change in objectively measured physical activity within the control group. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool and the Risk Of Bias in Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions tool. Meta-analyses will be conducted where possible among studies with sufficient homogeneity. Discussion: This systematic review and meta-analysis will determine the extent to which physical activity measurement alone is associated with changes in objectively measured physical activity levels in control groups in primary care. Findings from this study will inform future physical activity intervention research and practice. If measuring physical activity alone is associated with increases in physical activity levels that may be considered beneficial for health, this could indicate that measurement alone may be a low cost, efficient and effective method to increase a proprotion of the population's physical activity levels. 

AB - Background: There is some evidence that simply measuring physical activity alone can increase self-reported physical activity behaviour. Objective measures of physical activity in intervention studies have increased substantially over the last decade. Yet, there is no synthesised evidence of observed changes in the control group physical activity in trials that have used objective physical activity measurement approaches. Understanding factors associated with control group increases (or decreases) in physical activity may have implications for planning physical activity research and in clinical settings where objective measures of physical activity may be used. The aim of this systematic review is to describe changes in objectively measured physical activity that have occurred within control groups in primary care physical activity intervention studies and, if possible, identify factors that are potentially associated with these changes. Methods: The PRISMA-P reporting guidelines for systematic review protocols will be followed. Five electronic databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscuss, PsychINFO, CINAHL) will be searched to identify physical activity controlled (randomised, cluster, quasi-experimental) studies conducted with adults in primary care. Search terms will be based on previous systematic reviews, and only peer-reviewed articles published in English will be considered. The main outcome measure is the change in objectively measured physical activity within the control group. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool and the Risk Of Bias in Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions tool. Meta-analyses will be conducted where possible among studies with sufficient homogeneity. Discussion: This systematic review and meta-analysis will determine the extent to which physical activity measurement alone is associated with changes in objectively measured physical activity levels in control groups in primary care. Findings from this study will inform future physical activity intervention research and practice. If measuring physical activity alone is associated with increases in physical activity levels that may be considered beneficial for health, this could indicate that measurement alone may be a low cost, efficient and effective method to increase a proprotion of the population's physical activity levels. 

KW - Accelerometry

KW - Control

KW - Measurement

KW - Measurement reactivity

KW - Pedometer

KW - Question-behaviour effect

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067619554&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s13643-019-1060-2

DO - 10.1186/s13643-019-1060-2

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 1

EP - 6

JO - Systematic Reviews

JF - Systematic Reviews

SN - 2046-4053

M1 - 144

ER -