Co‐Present Conversation as “Socialized Trance”: Talk, Involvement Obligations, and Smart‐Phone Disruption

Michael WALSH, Shannon CLARK

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In an era where digital and co‐present involvements become entangled, the role of face‐to‐face conversation now vies with mediated communication. Applying insights provided by Erving Goffman, we explore conversational interaction and consider how engrossing face‐to‐face conversation can be understood as a form of socialized trance. We explore how this interaction represents one type of “involvement obligation” that can become disrupted and, increasingly, uniquely impacted by mediated involvements that are enabled through mobile and “smart” devices. The crux of the argument is considered in the context of a burgeoning digital era where conversation is found to become meshed together in uneven ways with mediated interaction. We highlight the efficacy of Goffman's approach with regards to the current information environment, providing insights into how engrossing conversation and its involvement obligations are impacted by mediated interactions and how breaches of conduct are experienced. A video abstract is available at https://youtu.be/ulL8mMN4oig.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6-26
Number of pages21
JournalSymbolic Interaction
Volume42
Issue number1
Early online date2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2019

Fingerprint

Smartphones
obligation
conversation
Equipment and Supplies
Communication
interaction
video
Smartphone
communication

Cite this

@article{f7c794c12794457897d28927892d7b12,
title = "Co‐Present Conversation as “Socialized Trance”: Talk, Involvement Obligations, and Smart‐Phone Disruption",
abstract = "In an era where digital and co‐present involvements become entangled, the role of face‐to‐face conversation now vies with mediated communication. Applying insights provided by Erving Goffman, we explore conversational interaction and consider how engrossing face‐to‐face conversation can be understood as a form of socialized trance. We explore how this interaction represents one type of “involvement obligation” that can become disrupted and, increasingly, uniquely impacted by mediated involvements that are enabled through mobile and “smart” devices. The crux of the argument is considered in the context of a burgeoning digital era where conversation is found to become meshed together in uneven ways with mediated interaction. We highlight the efficacy of Goffman's approach with regards to the current information environment, providing insights into how engrossing conversation and its involvement obligations are impacted by mediated interactions and how breaches of conduct are experienced. A video abstract is available at https://youtu.be/ulL8mMN4oig.",
keywords = "Goffman, conversation, disruption, engrossment, mediated interaction, mobile phones, trance",
author = "Michael WALSH and Shannon CLARK",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1002/symb.382",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "6--26",
journal = "Symbolic Interaction",
issn = "0195-6086",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Co‐Present Conversation as “Socialized Trance”: Talk, Involvement Obligations, and Smart‐Phone Disruption. / WALSH, Michael; CLARK, Shannon.

In: Symbolic Interaction, Vol. 42, No. 1, 02.2019, p. 6-26.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Co‐Present Conversation as “Socialized Trance”: Talk, Involvement Obligations, and Smart‐Phone Disruption

AU - WALSH, Michael

AU - CLARK, Shannon

PY - 2019/2

Y1 - 2019/2

N2 - In an era where digital and co‐present involvements become entangled, the role of face‐to‐face conversation now vies with mediated communication. Applying insights provided by Erving Goffman, we explore conversational interaction and consider how engrossing face‐to‐face conversation can be understood as a form of socialized trance. We explore how this interaction represents one type of “involvement obligation” that can become disrupted and, increasingly, uniquely impacted by mediated involvements that are enabled through mobile and “smart” devices. The crux of the argument is considered in the context of a burgeoning digital era where conversation is found to become meshed together in uneven ways with mediated interaction. We highlight the efficacy of Goffman's approach with regards to the current information environment, providing insights into how engrossing conversation and its involvement obligations are impacted by mediated interactions and how breaches of conduct are experienced. A video abstract is available at https://youtu.be/ulL8mMN4oig.

AB - In an era where digital and co‐present involvements become entangled, the role of face‐to‐face conversation now vies with mediated communication. Applying insights provided by Erving Goffman, we explore conversational interaction and consider how engrossing face‐to‐face conversation can be understood as a form of socialized trance. We explore how this interaction represents one type of “involvement obligation” that can become disrupted and, increasingly, uniquely impacted by mediated involvements that are enabled through mobile and “smart” devices. The crux of the argument is considered in the context of a burgeoning digital era where conversation is found to become meshed together in uneven ways with mediated interaction. We highlight the efficacy of Goffman's approach with regards to the current information environment, providing insights into how engrossing conversation and its involvement obligations are impacted by mediated interactions and how breaches of conduct are experienced. A video abstract is available at https://youtu.be/ulL8mMN4oig.

KW - Goffman

KW - conversation

KW - disruption

KW - engrossment

KW - mediated interaction

KW - mobile phones

KW - trance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052801937&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/copresent-conversation-socialized-trance-talk-involvement-obligations-smartphone-disruption

U2 - 10.1002/symb.382

DO - 10.1002/symb.382

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 6

EP - 26

JO - Symbolic Interaction

JF - Symbolic Interaction

SN - 0195-6086

IS - 1

ER -