Corporate human rights responsibility and multinationality in emerging markets-a legal perspective for corporate governance and responsibility

A legal perspective for corporate governance and responsibility

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This 'perspective' paper highlights the evolving concept and idea of corporate human rights responsibility (CHRR) under international law. The paper thus aims to rectify the scarcity of such a notion within the existing frameworks, and its related significance to other concepts of corporate responsibility and governance. This paper develops and builds upon the emerging concept of CHRR in the context of emerging market multinationality (EMM), by proposing that multinational corporation (MNCs) be more proactive in taking on board CHRR within their corporate governance (CG) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) agendas, so as to avoid future risks of being sued and taken to court. The current literature suggests paucity and underrepresentation of research on the legal facets of human right responsibilities on the part of MNCs in emerging economies such as India. The 'ghost' of the Bhopal tragedy 27 years ago in India still haunts us and has resurfaced with Dow Chemicals, then Union Carbide, who was responsible for the tragedy, also having sponsored the 2012 London Olympics, and gained more bad press, than good. This study thus specifically looks at India, through the 'unique', chronological and time-line (longitudinal) case of Bhopal, to elucidate our concept of CHRR.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)52-67
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Journal of Business Governance and Ethics
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Corporate governance
Human rights
Emerging markets
Corporate responsibility
Responsibility
Multinationality
India
Multinational corporations
International law
Corporate Social Responsibility
Scarcity
Agenda
Olympics
Emerging economies
Corporate boards

Cite this

@article{ae4f710608b048939e15eb3349f98de2,
title = "Corporate human rights responsibility and multinationality in emerging markets-a legal perspective for corporate governance and responsibility: A legal perspective for corporate governance and responsibility",
abstract = "This 'perspective' paper highlights the evolving concept and idea of corporate human rights responsibility (CHRR) under international law. The paper thus aims to rectify the scarcity of such a notion within the existing frameworks, and its related significance to other concepts of corporate responsibility and governance. This paper develops and builds upon the emerging concept of CHRR in the context of emerging market multinationality (EMM), by proposing that multinational corporation (MNCs) be more proactive in taking on board CHRR within their corporate governance (CG) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) agendas, so as to avoid future risks of being sued and taken to court. The current literature suggests paucity and underrepresentation of research on the legal facets of human right responsibilities on the part of MNCs in emerging economies such as India. The 'ghost' of the Bhopal tragedy 27 years ago in India still haunts us and has resurfaced with Dow Chemicals, then Union Carbide, who was responsible for the tragedy, also having sponsored the 2012 London Olympics, and gained more bad press, than good. This study thus specifically looks at India, through the 'unique', chronological and time-line (longitudinal) case of Bhopal, to elucidate our concept of CHRR.",
keywords = "Bhopal case, Business guidelines, CHRR, Corporate human rights responsibility, Corporate social responsibility, CSR, Good corporate governance, India",
author = "Bachmann, {Sascha Dominik} and Vijay Pereira",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1504/IJBGE.2014.062770",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "52--67",
journal = "International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics",
issn = "1477-9048",
publisher = "Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Corporate human rights responsibility and multinationality in emerging markets-a legal perspective for corporate governance and responsibility

T2 - A legal perspective for corporate governance and responsibility

AU - Bachmann, Sascha Dominik

AU - Pereira, Vijay

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - This 'perspective' paper highlights the evolving concept and idea of corporate human rights responsibility (CHRR) under international law. The paper thus aims to rectify the scarcity of such a notion within the existing frameworks, and its related significance to other concepts of corporate responsibility and governance. This paper develops and builds upon the emerging concept of CHRR in the context of emerging market multinationality (EMM), by proposing that multinational corporation (MNCs) be more proactive in taking on board CHRR within their corporate governance (CG) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) agendas, so as to avoid future risks of being sued and taken to court. The current literature suggests paucity and underrepresentation of research on the legal facets of human right responsibilities on the part of MNCs in emerging economies such as India. The 'ghost' of the Bhopal tragedy 27 years ago in India still haunts us and has resurfaced with Dow Chemicals, then Union Carbide, who was responsible for the tragedy, also having sponsored the 2012 London Olympics, and gained more bad press, than good. This study thus specifically looks at India, through the 'unique', chronological and time-line (longitudinal) case of Bhopal, to elucidate our concept of CHRR.

AB - This 'perspective' paper highlights the evolving concept and idea of corporate human rights responsibility (CHRR) under international law. The paper thus aims to rectify the scarcity of such a notion within the existing frameworks, and its related significance to other concepts of corporate responsibility and governance. This paper develops and builds upon the emerging concept of CHRR in the context of emerging market multinationality (EMM), by proposing that multinational corporation (MNCs) be more proactive in taking on board CHRR within their corporate governance (CG) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) agendas, so as to avoid future risks of being sued and taken to court. The current literature suggests paucity and underrepresentation of research on the legal facets of human right responsibilities on the part of MNCs in emerging economies such as India. The 'ghost' of the Bhopal tragedy 27 years ago in India still haunts us and has resurfaced with Dow Chemicals, then Union Carbide, who was responsible for the tragedy, also having sponsored the 2012 London Olympics, and gained more bad press, than good. This study thus specifically looks at India, through the 'unique', chronological and time-line (longitudinal) case of Bhopal, to elucidate our concept of CHRR.

KW - Bhopal case

KW - Business guidelines

KW - CHRR

KW - Corporate human rights responsibility

KW - Corporate social responsibility

KW - CSR

KW - Good corporate governance

KW - India

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902531392&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/corporate-human-rights-responsibility-multinationality-emerging-marketsa-legal-perspective-corporate

U2 - 10.1504/IJBGE.2014.062770

DO - 10.1504/IJBGE.2014.062770

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 52

EP - 67

JO - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics

JF - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics

SN - 1477-9048

IS - 1

ER -