Abstract
Success in warfare may be a matter of good fortune, superior resources and intelligence, propaganda, resilience, and training or discipline. It has often been attributed to exemplary leadership on the part of senior officers and civilians who provide strategic direction, assume operational responsibilities or choose the best officers. Failure has conversely been attributed to incompetence on the part of general staff and field commanders, interference by politicians in tactical decision-making or the behavior that led one biographer to characterize Hitler as the ‘psychopathic god’. This chapter suggests that corporate psychopathy offers a lens for understanding military leadership during times of peace and war. Some expression of the dark triad by people in command is likely to be accepted as consistent with institutional and broader cultural norms that valorize particular styles of leadership. Individuals who exhibit more extreme manifestations of corporate psychopathy are, by extension, likely to be acclaimed as long as they remain the favorites of the goddess of war.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Research Handbook on Corporate Psychopaths |
| Editors | Benedict Sheehy, Clive Roland Boddy, Bruce Baer Arnold |
| Publisher | Edward Elgar Publishing |
| Chapter | 28 |
| Pages | 409-419 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Volume | 1 |
| Edition | 1 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781035326518 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2026 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Corporate psychopathy and military leadership’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver