Correct Me if I'm Wrong: Groups Outperform Individuals in the Climate Stabilization Task

Belinda Xie, Mark J. Hurlstone, Iain Walker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Avoiding dangerous climate change requires ambitious emissions reduction. Scientists agree on this, but policy-makers and citizens do not. This discrepancy can be partly attributed to faulty mental models, which cause individuals to misunderstand the carbon dioxide (CO2) system. For example, in the Climate Stabilization Task (hereafter,“CST”) (Sterman and Booth-Sweeney, 2007), individuals systematically underestimate the emissions reduction required to stabilize atmospheric CO2 levels, which may lead them to endorse ineffective “wait-and-see” climate policies. Thus far, interventions to correct faulty mental models in the CST have failed to produce robust improvements in decision-making. Here, in the first study to test a group-based intervention, we
found that success rates on the CST markedly increased after participants deliberated with peers in a group discussion. The group discussion served to invalidate the faulty reasoning strategies used by some individual group members, thus increasing the proportion of group members who possessed the correct mental model of the CO2 system. Our findings suggest that policy-making and public education would benefit from group-based practices.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-12
Number of pages12
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Nov 2018

Cite this

@article{ac8b7ec090414388944c257c231097b3,
title = "Correct Me if I'm Wrong: Groups Outperform Individuals in the Climate Stabilization Task",
abstract = "Avoiding dangerous climate change requires ambitious emissions reduction. Scientists agree on this, but policy-makers and citizens do not. This discrepancy can be partly attributed to faulty mental models, which cause individuals to misunderstand the carbon dioxide (CO2) system. For example, in the Climate Stabilization Task (hereafter,“CST”) (Sterman and Booth-Sweeney, 2007), individuals systematically underestimate the emissions reduction required to stabilize atmospheric CO2 levels, which may lead them to endorse ineffective “wait-and-see” climate policies. Thus far, interventions to correct faulty mental models in the CST have failed to produce robust improvements in decision-making. Here, in the first study to test a group-based intervention, wefound that success rates on the CST markedly increased after participants deliberated with peers in a group discussion. The group discussion served to invalidate the faulty reasoning strategies used by some individual group members, thus increasing the proportion of group members who possessed the correct mental model of the CO2 system. Our findings suggest that policy-making and public education would benefit from group-based practices.",
keywords = "climate stabilization task, mental models, group decision-making, carbon dioxide accumulation, stock-flow tasks, emissions reduction",
author = "Belinda Xie and Hurlstone, {Mark J.} and Iain Walker",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "30",
doi = "10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02274",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "1--12",
journal = "Frontiers in Psychology",
issn = "1664-1078",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S.A.",

}

Correct Me if I'm Wrong: Groups Outperform Individuals in the Climate Stabilization Task. / Xie, Belinda; Hurlstone, Mark J.; Walker, Iain.

In: Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 9, 30.11.2018, p. 1-12.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Correct Me if I'm Wrong: Groups Outperform Individuals in the Climate Stabilization Task

AU - Xie, Belinda

AU - Hurlstone, Mark J.

AU - Walker, Iain

PY - 2018/11/30

Y1 - 2018/11/30

N2 - Avoiding dangerous climate change requires ambitious emissions reduction. Scientists agree on this, but policy-makers and citizens do not. This discrepancy can be partly attributed to faulty mental models, which cause individuals to misunderstand the carbon dioxide (CO2) system. For example, in the Climate Stabilization Task (hereafter,“CST”) (Sterman and Booth-Sweeney, 2007), individuals systematically underestimate the emissions reduction required to stabilize atmospheric CO2 levels, which may lead them to endorse ineffective “wait-and-see” climate policies. Thus far, interventions to correct faulty mental models in the CST have failed to produce robust improvements in decision-making. Here, in the first study to test a group-based intervention, wefound that success rates on the CST markedly increased after participants deliberated with peers in a group discussion. The group discussion served to invalidate the faulty reasoning strategies used by some individual group members, thus increasing the proportion of group members who possessed the correct mental model of the CO2 system. Our findings suggest that policy-making and public education would benefit from group-based practices.

AB - Avoiding dangerous climate change requires ambitious emissions reduction. Scientists agree on this, but policy-makers and citizens do not. This discrepancy can be partly attributed to faulty mental models, which cause individuals to misunderstand the carbon dioxide (CO2) system. For example, in the Climate Stabilization Task (hereafter,“CST”) (Sterman and Booth-Sweeney, 2007), individuals systematically underestimate the emissions reduction required to stabilize atmospheric CO2 levels, which may lead them to endorse ineffective “wait-and-see” climate policies. Thus far, interventions to correct faulty mental models in the CST have failed to produce robust improvements in decision-making. Here, in the first study to test a group-based intervention, wefound that success rates on the CST markedly increased after participants deliberated with peers in a group discussion. The group discussion served to invalidate the faulty reasoning strategies used by some individual group members, thus increasing the proportion of group members who possessed the correct mental model of the CO2 system. Our findings suggest that policy-making and public education would benefit from group-based practices.

KW - climate stabilization task

KW - mental models

KW - group decision-making

KW - carbon dioxide accumulation

KW - stock-flow tasks

KW - emissions reduction

U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02274

DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02274

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 1

EP - 12

JO - Frontiers in Psychology

JF - Frontiers in Psychology

SN - 1664-1078

ER -