Correlates of agreement between accelerometry and self-reported physical activity

Ester Cerin, Kelli L. Cain, Adewale Oyeyemi, Neville Owen, Terry L. Conway, Tom COCHRANE, Delfien Van Dyck, Jasper Schipperijn, Josef Mitáš, Mette Toftager, Ines Aguinaga-Ontoso, James F. Sallis

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    43 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Purpose Understanding factors that influence accurate assessment of physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) is important to measurement development, epidemiologic studies, and interventions. This study examined agreement between self-reported (International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Long Form [IPAQ-LF]) and accelerometry-based estimates of PA and SB across six countries and identified correlates of between-method agreement. Methods Self-report and objective (accelerometry-based) PA and SB data were collected in 2002-2011 from 3865 adult participants in eight cities from six countries (Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Spain, United Kingdom, and United States). Between-method relative agreement (correlation) and absolute disagreement (mean difference between conceptually and intensity-matched IPAQ-LF and accelerometry-based PA and SB variables) were estimated. Also, sociodemographic characteristics and PA patterns were examined as correlates of between-method agreement. Results Observed relative agreement (relationships of IPAQ-LF with accelerometry-based PA and SB variables) was small to moderate (r = 0.05-0.37) and was moderated by sociodemographic (age, sex, weight status, and education) and behavioral (PA-type) factors. The absolute disagreement was large, with participants self-reporting higher PA intensity and total time in moderate-to-vigorous-intensity PA than accelerometry. Also, self-reported sitting time was lower than accelerometry-based sedentary behavior. After adjusting for sociodemographic and behavioral factors, the absolute disagreement between pairs of IPAQ-LF and accelerometry-based PA variables remained significantly different across cities/countries. Conclusions Present findings suggest systematic cultural and/or linguistic and sociodemographic differences in absolute agreement between the IPAQ-LF and the accelerometry-based PA and SB variables. These results have implications for the interpretation of international PA and SB data and correlate/determinant studies. They call for further efforts to improve such measures.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1075-1084
    Number of pages10
    JournalMedicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
    Volume48
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Fingerprint

    Accelerometry
    Exercise

    Cite this

    Cerin, E., Cain, K. L., Oyeyemi, A., Owen, N., Conway, T. L., COCHRANE, T., ... Sallis, J. F. (2016). Correlates of agreement between accelerometry and self-reported physical activity. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 48(6), 1075-1084. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000870
    Cerin, Ester ; Cain, Kelli L. ; Oyeyemi, Adewale ; Owen, Neville ; Conway, Terry L. ; COCHRANE, Tom ; Van Dyck, Delfien ; Schipperijn, Jasper ; Mitáš, Josef ; Toftager, Mette ; Aguinaga-Ontoso, Ines ; Sallis, James F. / Correlates of agreement between accelerometry and self-reported physical activity. In: Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2016 ; Vol. 48, No. 6. pp. 1075-1084.
    @article{55ba16b69465420e90f3ffebbd014895,
    title = "Correlates of agreement between accelerometry and self-reported physical activity",
    abstract = "Purpose Understanding factors that influence accurate assessment of physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) is important to measurement development, epidemiologic studies, and interventions. This study examined agreement between self-reported (International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Long Form [IPAQ-LF]) and accelerometry-based estimates of PA and SB across six countries and identified correlates of between-method agreement. Methods Self-report and objective (accelerometry-based) PA and SB data were collected in 2002-2011 from 3865 adult participants in eight cities from six countries (Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Spain, United Kingdom, and United States). Between-method relative agreement (correlation) and absolute disagreement (mean difference between conceptually and intensity-matched IPAQ-LF and accelerometry-based PA and SB variables) were estimated. Also, sociodemographic characteristics and PA patterns were examined as correlates of between-method agreement. Results Observed relative agreement (relationships of IPAQ-LF with accelerometry-based PA and SB variables) was small to moderate (r = 0.05-0.37) and was moderated by sociodemographic (age, sex, weight status, and education) and behavioral (PA-type) factors. The absolute disagreement was large, with participants self-reporting higher PA intensity and total time in moderate-to-vigorous-intensity PA than accelerometry. Also, self-reported sitting time was lower than accelerometry-based sedentary behavior. After adjusting for sociodemographic and behavioral factors, the absolute disagreement between pairs of IPAQ-LF and accelerometry-based PA variables remained significantly different across cities/countries. Conclusions Present findings suggest systematic cultural and/or linguistic and sociodemographic differences in absolute agreement between the IPAQ-LF and the accelerometry-based PA and SB variables. These results have implications for the interpretation of international PA and SB data and correlate/determinant studies. They call for further efforts to improve such measures.",
    author = "Ester Cerin and Cain, {Kelli L.} and Adewale Oyeyemi and Neville Owen and Conway, {Terry L.} and Tom COCHRANE and {Van Dyck}, Delfien and Jasper Schipperijn and Josef Mit{\'a}š and Mette Toftager and Ines Aguinaga-Ontoso and Sallis, {James F.}",
    year = "2016",
    doi = "10.1249/MSS.0000000000000870",
    language = "English",
    volume = "48",
    pages = "1075--1084",
    journal = "Medicine Science in Sports Exercise",
    issn = "0195-9131",
    publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
    number = "6",

    }

    Cerin, E, Cain, KL, Oyeyemi, A, Owen, N, Conway, TL, COCHRANE, T, Van Dyck, D, Schipperijn, J, Mitáš, J, Toftager, M, Aguinaga-Ontoso, I & Sallis, JF 2016, 'Correlates of agreement between accelerometry and self-reported physical activity', Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1075-1084. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000870

    Correlates of agreement between accelerometry and self-reported physical activity. / Cerin, Ester; Cain, Kelli L.; Oyeyemi, Adewale; Owen, Neville; Conway, Terry L.; COCHRANE, Tom; Van Dyck, Delfien; Schipperijn, Jasper; Mitáš, Josef; Toftager, Mette; Aguinaga-Ontoso, Ines; Sallis, James F.

    In: Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, Vol. 48, No. 6, 2016, p. 1075-1084.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Correlates of agreement between accelerometry and self-reported physical activity

    AU - Cerin, Ester

    AU - Cain, Kelli L.

    AU - Oyeyemi, Adewale

    AU - Owen, Neville

    AU - Conway, Terry L.

    AU - COCHRANE, Tom

    AU - Van Dyck, Delfien

    AU - Schipperijn, Jasper

    AU - Mitáš, Josef

    AU - Toftager, Mette

    AU - Aguinaga-Ontoso, Ines

    AU - Sallis, James F.

    PY - 2016

    Y1 - 2016

    N2 - Purpose Understanding factors that influence accurate assessment of physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) is important to measurement development, epidemiologic studies, and interventions. This study examined agreement between self-reported (International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Long Form [IPAQ-LF]) and accelerometry-based estimates of PA and SB across six countries and identified correlates of between-method agreement. Methods Self-report and objective (accelerometry-based) PA and SB data were collected in 2002-2011 from 3865 adult participants in eight cities from six countries (Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Spain, United Kingdom, and United States). Between-method relative agreement (correlation) and absolute disagreement (mean difference between conceptually and intensity-matched IPAQ-LF and accelerometry-based PA and SB variables) were estimated. Also, sociodemographic characteristics and PA patterns were examined as correlates of between-method agreement. Results Observed relative agreement (relationships of IPAQ-LF with accelerometry-based PA and SB variables) was small to moderate (r = 0.05-0.37) and was moderated by sociodemographic (age, sex, weight status, and education) and behavioral (PA-type) factors. The absolute disagreement was large, with participants self-reporting higher PA intensity and total time in moderate-to-vigorous-intensity PA than accelerometry. Also, self-reported sitting time was lower than accelerometry-based sedentary behavior. After adjusting for sociodemographic and behavioral factors, the absolute disagreement between pairs of IPAQ-LF and accelerometry-based PA variables remained significantly different across cities/countries. Conclusions Present findings suggest systematic cultural and/or linguistic and sociodemographic differences in absolute agreement between the IPAQ-LF and the accelerometry-based PA and SB variables. These results have implications for the interpretation of international PA and SB data and correlate/determinant studies. They call for further efforts to improve such measures.

    AB - Purpose Understanding factors that influence accurate assessment of physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) is important to measurement development, epidemiologic studies, and interventions. This study examined agreement between self-reported (International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Long Form [IPAQ-LF]) and accelerometry-based estimates of PA and SB across six countries and identified correlates of between-method agreement. Methods Self-report and objective (accelerometry-based) PA and SB data were collected in 2002-2011 from 3865 adult participants in eight cities from six countries (Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Spain, United Kingdom, and United States). Between-method relative agreement (correlation) and absolute disagreement (mean difference between conceptually and intensity-matched IPAQ-LF and accelerometry-based PA and SB variables) were estimated. Also, sociodemographic characteristics and PA patterns were examined as correlates of between-method agreement. Results Observed relative agreement (relationships of IPAQ-LF with accelerometry-based PA and SB variables) was small to moderate (r = 0.05-0.37) and was moderated by sociodemographic (age, sex, weight status, and education) and behavioral (PA-type) factors. The absolute disagreement was large, with participants self-reporting higher PA intensity and total time in moderate-to-vigorous-intensity PA than accelerometry. Also, self-reported sitting time was lower than accelerometry-based sedentary behavior. After adjusting for sociodemographic and behavioral factors, the absolute disagreement between pairs of IPAQ-LF and accelerometry-based PA variables remained significantly different across cities/countries. Conclusions Present findings suggest systematic cultural and/or linguistic and sociodemographic differences in absolute agreement between the IPAQ-LF and the accelerometry-based PA and SB variables. These results have implications for the interpretation of international PA and SB data and correlate/determinant studies. They call for further efforts to improve such measures.

    U2 - 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000870

    DO - 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000870

    M3 - Article

    VL - 48

    SP - 1075

    EP - 1084

    JO - Medicine Science in Sports Exercise

    JF - Medicine Science in Sports Exercise

    SN - 0195-9131

    IS - 6

    ER -