Abstract
The authors regret that were some minor numerical errors in some of the z-score values reported in Appendix Table 3. However, all of the raw scores values are correct and unchanged. This error does not affect the results or conclusions of the original paper, or the results reported using the same dataset and scale in subsequent and future studies. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. The correct Appendix Table 3 is attached. For convenience, the authors have also created the summary table below for the raw score cut-offs that can be used for categorisation scoring into ‘Flourishing’, ‘Moderate’, and ‘Languishing’ groups. This is based on the correct z-score cut-offs of −1/+1 derived from our sample of 846 healthy adult twins ranging in age from 18 to 61 years (Gatt et al., 2014). The cut-offs below are based on the averages and variance of this healthy twin sample, and therefore should be interpreted as an approximate guide only. [Table presented] DOI of original article: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.04.033
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 114141 |
Pages (from-to) | 1-1 |
Number of pages | 1 |
Journal | Psychiatry Research |
Volume | 304 |
DOIs |
|
Publication status | Published - Oct 2021 |
Externally published | Yes |