Creating institutional flexibility for adaptive water management

insights from two management agencies

Michael Peat, Katie Moon, Fiona DYER, William Johnson, Susan J. Nichols

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Adaptive management is an experimental approach used by water management agencies around the world to manage and restore aquatic ecosystems. The effectiveness of the approach can often be constrained by inflexible institutional arrangements. In this paper we compare two cases where agencies have implemented adaptive management to manage and restore aquatic ecosystems. Our aim was to understand practitioners' perceptions of how institutional flexibility can be created for adaptive management. We interviewed 14 adaptive management practitioners working in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia and 14 practitioners in Southern Florida, United States of America. We found that in both cases, just enough flexibility was created to enable experimentation, but informal institutional arrangements tended to constrain adaptive management. We also found that adaptive management was effective when an agency adopted collaborative and distributed leadership, but these leadership styles were difficult to sustain, and not always appropriate when attempting to create institutional flexibility. Our results illustrate how agencies, stakeholders and researchers can develop a shared understanding of how to manage and restore aquatic ecosystems, which in turn, helps create institutional flexibility for an agency to manage adaptively.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)188-197
    Number of pages10
    JournalJournal of Environmental Management
    Volume202
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2017

    Fingerprint

    adaptive management
    Water management
    Ecosystem
    water management
    Aquatic ecosystems
    Water
    aquatic ecosystem
    leadership
    Research Personnel
    stakeholder
    basin

    Cite this

    @article{8ae8fa3fbbec440b824e4061bfe189c0,
    title = "Creating institutional flexibility for adaptive water management: insights from two management agencies",
    abstract = "Adaptive management is an experimental approach used by water management agencies around the world to manage and restore aquatic ecosystems. The effectiveness of the approach can often be constrained by inflexible institutional arrangements. In this paper we compare two cases where agencies have implemented adaptive management to manage and restore aquatic ecosystems. Our aim was to understand practitioners' perceptions of how institutional flexibility can be created for adaptive management. We interviewed 14 adaptive management practitioners working in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia and 14 practitioners in Southern Florida, United States of America. We found that in both cases, just enough flexibility was created to enable experimentation, but informal institutional arrangements tended to constrain adaptive management. We also found that adaptive management was effective when an agency adopted collaborative and distributed leadership, but these leadership styles were difficult to sustain, and not always appropriate when attempting to create institutional flexibility. Our results illustrate how agencies, stakeholders and researchers can develop a shared understanding of how to manage and restore aquatic ecosystems, which in turn, helps create institutional flexibility for an agency to manage adaptively.",
    keywords = "Aquatic ecosystem restoration, Institution, Leadership, Qualitative research, Social learning",
    author = "Michael Peat and Katie Moon and Fiona DYER and William Johnson and Nichols, {Susan J.}",
    year = "2017",
    month = "11",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.06.059",
    language = "English",
    volume = "202",
    pages = "188--197",
    journal = "Advances in Environmental Research",
    issn = "0301-4797",
    publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
    number = "1",

    }

    Creating institutional flexibility for adaptive water management : insights from two management agencies. / Peat, Michael; Moon, Katie; DYER, Fiona; Johnson, William; Nichols, Susan J.

    In: Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 202, No. 1, 01.11.2017, p. 188-197.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Creating institutional flexibility for adaptive water management

    T2 - insights from two management agencies

    AU - Peat, Michael

    AU - Moon, Katie

    AU - DYER, Fiona

    AU - Johnson, William

    AU - Nichols, Susan J.

    PY - 2017/11/1

    Y1 - 2017/11/1

    N2 - Adaptive management is an experimental approach used by water management agencies around the world to manage and restore aquatic ecosystems. The effectiveness of the approach can often be constrained by inflexible institutional arrangements. In this paper we compare two cases where agencies have implemented adaptive management to manage and restore aquatic ecosystems. Our aim was to understand practitioners' perceptions of how institutional flexibility can be created for adaptive management. We interviewed 14 adaptive management practitioners working in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia and 14 practitioners in Southern Florida, United States of America. We found that in both cases, just enough flexibility was created to enable experimentation, but informal institutional arrangements tended to constrain adaptive management. We also found that adaptive management was effective when an agency adopted collaborative and distributed leadership, but these leadership styles were difficult to sustain, and not always appropriate when attempting to create institutional flexibility. Our results illustrate how agencies, stakeholders and researchers can develop a shared understanding of how to manage and restore aquatic ecosystems, which in turn, helps create institutional flexibility for an agency to manage adaptively.

    AB - Adaptive management is an experimental approach used by water management agencies around the world to manage and restore aquatic ecosystems. The effectiveness of the approach can often be constrained by inflexible institutional arrangements. In this paper we compare two cases where agencies have implemented adaptive management to manage and restore aquatic ecosystems. Our aim was to understand practitioners' perceptions of how institutional flexibility can be created for adaptive management. We interviewed 14 adaptive management practitioners working in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia and 14 practitioners in Southern Florida, United States of America. We found that in both cases, just enough flexibility was created to enable experimentation, but informal institutional arrangements tended to constrain adaptive management. We also found that adaptive management was effective when an agency adopted collaborative and distributed leadership, but these leadership styles were difficult to sustain, and not always appropriate when attempting to create institutional flexibility. Our results illustrate how agencies, stakeholders and researchers can develop a shared understanding of how to manage and restore aquatic ecosystems, which in turn, helps create institutional flexibility for an agency to manage adaptively.

    KW - Aquatic ecosystem restoration

    KW - Institution

    KW - Leadership

    KW - Qualitative research

    KW - Social learning

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85025074976&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.06.059

    DO - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.06.059

    M3 - Article

    VL - 202

    SP - 188

    EP - 197

    JO - Advances in Environmental Research

    JF - Advances in Environmental Research

    SN - 0301-4797

    IS - 1

    ER -