Creating more 'elbow room' for collaborative reflective practice in the competitive, performative culture of today's university

Robert KENNELLY, Coralie McCormack

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We live in “a world of clashing interests” [Zinn, H. (1991). Declarations of independence: Cross-examining American ideology. Toronto: Harper Collins, p. xx]. In a grapple for survival, universities choose to spend less money and time on teaching and learning, less time on robust evaluation of student learning and concomitantly less active support for collaborative reflective practice. However, the situation is even more dire than that outlined above because university management seeks to portray its focus on teaching and learning as genuine and a priority. Considerable effort is spent on encouraging teachers to compete for teaching excellence awards at the same time as universities push academics harder and harder into “real research”, that is, research that is not about teaching and learning. This is further exacerbated by the use of teaching quality instruments which have been criticised as unreliable indicators of student learning. This paper argues that individual reflective practitioners collecting and collaborating together can advocate for teaching in the current higher education environment but the outreach of this advocacy is likely to be limited when the advocacy remains within “pockets of resistance”. To further promote change from within the institution and extend the breadth and depth of an individual's influence beyond the pockets of resistance, we suggest that individuals use collaborative reflective practice-based strategies aligned with each of the dimensions of the institution’s “cultural web”. Collaborative reflective practice has the potential to advocate for teaching beyond small groups of enthusiasts because it taps into the often hidden but heart-felt passion and commitment to teaching held by many academics.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)942-956
Number of pages15
JournalHigher Education Research and Development
Volume34
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

university
Teaching
learning
declaration of independence
cultural institution
small group
money
ideology
student
commitment
teacher
evaluation
management
education
time

Cite this

@article{1059d488349a40b8b054807c530aec23,
title = "Creating more 'elbow room' for collaborative reflective practice in the competitive, performative culture of today's university",
abstract = "We live in “a world of clashing interests” [Zinn, H. (1991). Declarations of independence: Cross-examining American ideology. Toronto: Harper Collins, p. xx]. In a grapple for survival, universities choose to spend less money and time on teaching and learning, less time on robust evaluation of student learning and concomitantly less active support for collaborative reflective practice. However, the situation is even more dire than that outlined above because university management seeks to portray its focus on teaching and learning as genuine and a priority. Considerable effort is spent on encouraging teachers to compete for teaching excellence awards at the same time as universities push academics harder and harder into “real research”, that is, research that is not about teaching and learning. This is further exacerbated by the use of teaching quality instruments which have been criticised as unreliable indicators of student learning. This paper argues that individual reflective practitioners collecting and collaborating together can advocate for teaching in the current higher education environment but the outreach of this advocacy is likely to be limited when the advocacy remains within “pockets of resistance”. To further promote change from within the institution and extend the breadth and depth of an individual's influence beyond the pockets of resistance, we suggest that individuals use collaborative reflective practice-based strategies aligned with each of the dimensions of the institution’s “cultural web”. Collaborative reflective practice has the potential to advocate for teaching beyond small groups of enthusiasts because it taps into the often hidden but heart-felt passion and commitment to teaching held by many academics.",
keywords = "collaboration, communities of practice, organisational culture, reflection, reflective practice",
author = "Robert KENNELLY and Coralie McCormack",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/07294360.2014.911259",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "942--956",
journal = "HERDSA Review of Higher Education",
issn = "0729-4360",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "5",

}

Creating more 'elbow room' for collaborative reflective practice in the competitive, performative culture of today's university. / KENNELLY, Robert; McCormack, Coralie.

In: Higher Education Research and Development, Vol. 34, No. 5, 2015, p. 942-956.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Creating more 'elbow room' for collaborative reflective practice in the competitive, performative culture of today's university

AU - KENNELLY, Robert

AU - McCormack, Coralie

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - We live in “a world of clashing interests” [Zinn, H. (1991). Declarations of independence: Cross-examining American ideology. Toronto: Harper Collins, p. xx]. In a grapple for survival, universities choose to spend less money and time on teaching and learning, less time on robust evaluation of student learning and concomitantly less active support for collaborative reflective practice. However, the situation is even more dire than that outlined above because university management seeks to portray its focus on teaching and learning as genuine and a priority. Considerable effort is spent on encouraging teachers to compete for teaching excellence awards at the same time as universities push academics harder and harder into “real research”, that is, research that is not about teaching and learning. This is further exacerbated by the use of teaching quality instruments which have been criticised as unreliable indicators of student learning. This paper argues that individual reflective practitioners collecting and collaborating together can advocate for teaching in the current higher education environment but the outreach of this advocacy is likely to be limited when the advocacy remains within “pockets of resistance”. To further promote change from within the institution and extend the breadth and depth of an individual's influence beyond the pockets of resistance, we suggest that individuals use collaborative reflective practice-based strategies aligned with each of the dimensions of the institution’s “cultural web”. Collaborative reflective practice has the potential to advocate for teaching beyond small groups of enthusiasts because it taps into the often hidden but heart-felt passion and commitment to teaching held by many academics.

AB - We live in “a world of clashing interests” [Zinn, H. (1991). Declarations of independence: Cross-examining American ideology. Toronto: Harper Collins, p. xx]. In a grapple for survival, universities choose to spend less money and time on teaching and learning, less time on robust evaluation of student learning and concomitantly less active support for collaborative reflective practice. However, the situation is even more dire than that outlined above because university management seeks to portray its focus on teaching and learning as genuine and a priority. Considerable effort is spent on encouraging teachers to compete for teaching excellence awards at the same time as universities push academics harder and harder into “real research”, that is, research that is not about teaching and learning. This is further exacerbated by the use of teaching quality instruments which have been criticised as unreliable indicators of student learning. This paper argues that individual reflective practitioners collecting and collaborating together can advocate for teaching in the current higher education environment but the outreach of this advocacy is likely to be limited when the advocacy remains within “pockets of resistance”. To further promote change from within the institution and extend the breadth and depth of an individual's influence beyond the pockets of resistance, we suggest that individuals use collaborative reflective practice-based strategies aligned with each of the dimensions of the institution’s “cultural web”. Collaborative reflective practice has the potential to advocate for teaching beyond small groups of enthusiasts because it taps into the often hidden but heart-felt passion and commitment to teaching held by many academics.

KW - collaboration

KW - communities of practice

KW - organisational culture

KW - reflection

KW - reflective practice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942984594&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/creating-more-elbow-room-collaborative-reflective-practice-competitive-performative-culture-todays-u

U2 - 10.1080/07294360.2014.911259

DO - 10.1080/07294360.2014.911259

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 942

EP - 956

JO - HERDSA Review of Higher Education

JF - HERDSA Review of Higher Education

SN - 0729-4360

IS - 5

ER -