Abstract
The book commences with an overview of previous research on judicial sentencing decision-making in England and Wales, Scotland, Canada, and Australia, as well as examples of judicial officers declining to be involved in such research. Brown sets out the methodology for his research in Chapter Two, including issues in relation to gaining access. I could particularly relate to this section, as I also interviewed judicial officers for my PhD, speaking with 16 of the then 18 judicial officers in Tasmania about their views on suspended sentences.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 308-310 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2019 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Criminal sentencing as practical wisdom'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver