Crises and structural change in Australian agriculture

Stefan Mann, Ben FREYENS, Huong DINH

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    We present a model of structural change in the farming sector in which natural and economic crises decrease farmers’ work satisfaction, farm profitability, and the decision to stay in farming. Using data from the Australian Regional Well-being survey, activity choice modeling, and a structural equation approach, we test the hypothesis that these crises-induced effects then cause structural change in Australian agriculture. We find that external shocks, such as drought or economic downturn, negatively affect farmers’ welfare, which in turn causes structural change through revised activity choices. Our empirical findings also indicate that specific adjustment strategies such as buying additional water titles or reducing input use are insufficient to mitigate adverse crises effects.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)76-87
    Number of pages12
    JournalReview of Social Economy
    Volume75
    Issue number1
    Early online date2016
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2017

    Fingerprint

    Agriculture
    Structural change
    Farming
    Farmers
    Choice modelling
    External shocks
    Work satisfaction
    Adjustment strategies
    Economic crisis
    Farm
    Economic downturn
    Structural equations
    Well-being
    Drought
    Profitability
    Input use
    Water

    Cite this

    Mann, Stefan ; FREYENS, Ben ; DINH, Huong. / Crises and structural change in Australian agriculture. In: Review of Social Economy. 2017 ; Vol. 75, No. 1. pp. 76-87.
    @article{ed86faeacd744a1eb7145511af5b6a47,
    title = "Crises and structural change in Australian agriculture",
    abstract = "We present a model of structural change in the farming sector in which natural and economic crises decrease farmers’ work satisfaction, farm profitability, and the decision to stay in farming. Using data from the Australian Regional Well-being survey, activity choice modeling, and a structural equation approach, we test the hypothesis that these crises-induced effects then cause structural change in Australian agriculture. We find that external shocks, such as drought or economic downturn, negatively affect farmers’ welfare, which in turn causes structural change through revised activity choices. Our empirical findings also indicate that specific adjustment strategies such as buying additional water titles or reducing input use are insufficient to mitigate adverse crises effects.",
    keywords = "Draft, happiness, agriculture, Australia",
    author = "Stefan Mann and Ben FREYENS and Huong DINH",
    year = "2017",
    doi = "10.1080/00346764.2016.1219383",
    language = "English",
    volume = "75",
    pages = "76--87",
    journal = "Review of Social Economy",
    issn = "0034-6764",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "1",

    }

    Crises and structural change in Australian agriculture. / Mann, Stefan; FREYENS, Ben; DINH, Huong.

    In: Review of Social Economy, Vol. 75, No. 1, 2017, p. 76-87.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Crises and structural change in Australian agriculture

    AU - Mann, Stefan

    AU - FREYENS, Ben

    AU - DINH, Huong

    PY - 2017

    Y1 - 2017

    N2 - We present a model of structural change in the farming sector in which natural and economic crises decrease farmers’ work satisfaction, farm profitability, and the decision to stay in farming. Using data from the Australian Regional Well-being survey, activity choice modeling, and a structural equation approach, we test the hypothesis that these crises-induced effects then cause structural change in Australian agriculture. We find that external shocks, such as drought or economic downturn, negatively affect farmers’ welfare, which in turn causes structural change through revised activity choices. Our empirical findings also indicate that specific adjustment strategies such as buying additional water titles or reducing input use are insufficient to mitigate adverse crises effects.

    AB - We present a model of structural change in the farming sector in which natural and economic crises decrease farmers’ work satisfaction, farm profitability, and the decision to stay in farming. Using data from the Australian Regional Well-being survey, activity choice modeling, and a structural equation approach, we test the hypothesis that these crises-induced effects then cause structural change in Australian agriculture. We find that external shocks, such as drought or economic downturn, negatively affect farmers’ welfare, which in turn causes structural change through revised activity choices. Our empirical findings also indicate that specific adjustment strategies such as buying additional water titles or reducing input use are insufficient to mitigate adverse crises effects.

    KW - Draft

    KW - happiness

    KW - agriculture

    KW - Australia

    U2 - 10.1080/00346764.2016.1219383

    DO - 10.1080/00346764.2016.1219383

    M3 - Article

    VL - 75

    SP - 76

    EP - 87

    JO - Review of Social Economy

    JF - Review of Social Economy

    SN - 0034-6764

    IS - 1

    ER -