Critical Pedagogy and the Mythopoetic

A Case Study from Adelaide's Northern Urban Fringe

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookChapter in text book

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper reports on a series of interviews from within a critical action research study with teachers in Adelaide's northern fringe. These interviews focused on what motivated and sustained teachers who had worked for many years within an area of significant socioeconomic challenge. In the context of a synthesis between critical and mythopoetic approaches to educational practice, the paper explores features of the personal and professional lives of teachers. Among the features that emerge include: the interpersonal nature of the relationship between teachers and students; the complexity and paradox in public schools that seek to achieve accountability through power-oriented regimes of testing and curricula; the presence of emotional labour, love, and hope in teachers' work; and the role of powerful metaphors in sustaining teachers in the pursuit of spaces of social justice in students' school experience. The voices that emerge from these interviews demonstrate that an approach to critical pedagogy that ignores the interpersonal, the imaginal, and the emotional is an insufficient basis for achieving critical aims. The paper contends that the head, heart, and hands are required for socially just middle school reform.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPedagogies of the Imagination
Subtitle of host publicationMythopoetic Curriculum in Educational Practice
EditorsTimothy Leonard, Peter Willis
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherSpringer
Chapter15
Pages203-222
Number of pages20
ISBN (Electronic)9781402083501
ISBN (Print)9781402082818
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2008
Externally publishedYes

    Fingerprint

Cite this

Prosser, B. (2008). Critical Pedagogy and the Mythopoetic: A Case Study from Adelaide's Northern Urban Fringe. In T. Leonard, & P. Willis (Eds.), Pedagogies of the Imagination: Mythopoetic Curriculum in Educational Practice (pp. 203-222). London: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8350-1_15